this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
115 points (71.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43858 readers
1516 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This would save young Americans from going into crippling debt, but it would also make a university degree completely unaffordable for most. However, in the age of the Internet, that doesn't mean they couldn't get an education.

Consider the long term impact of this. There are a lot of different ways such a situation could go, for better and for worse.

(page 3) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

TFW Americans have an orphan crushing machine and have a full debate on the color of the machine's knobs. ๐Ÿ˜จ

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I think universities would be forced to compete on price to survive, so Iโ€™m all for it.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

You could also just not take out college loans.

In the early 2000s I did community College and then got my bachlors. 6 years and no debt.

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consider that maybe people shouldn't be taking 50k in debt right out of highschool for a degree they aren't sure they really want in a field that's already over saturated. I feel for the kids who were young and dumb and goaded into signing on the dotted line but ultimately it was their choice to take on debt and they reap what they sow.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

In general, I'm opposed to the idea. College professors don't work for free, and colleges have to pay them. Like it or not, we live in a capitalist society, and everyone needs to be paid. You could raise taxes and fund college publicly, but then you're just passing off the cost of a college education to the taxpayers.

What does need to happen is a tighter regulation of tuition fees. A student should be able to take out a student loan, work a minimum wage job to pay for rent and personal expenses, and be able to pay off their student loan within a few years of graduation. The problem right now is that even if a college student manages to get a job in their field immediately after school, they're stuck paying student loans for a decade or more. 50 years ago, you could work a job flipping burgers, pay for school, and be firmly on your feet a few years after you get your degree. I went to college about 20 years ago, and tuition fees have just about doubled since then. The cost of higher education has far outpaced the average income of a college student.

Nobody should get a free ride; students should pay for school, but they shouldn't be in crippling debt afterwards. There needs to be legislation that forces the cost of education to fit with the minimum wage.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think the answer to this is to make more community colleges offer four year degrees. They are mainly funded through property taxes just like grade school and the professors get paid just fine. $300 per class is a reasonable fee for students.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Why have tuition fees doubled? Where is that money going?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ