119
submitted 10 months ago by bignose@ttrpg.network to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
  • Police were called to Dragon Con after an artist was accused of selling A.I.-generated artwork at their booth.
  • Vendor Oriana Gerez faced backlash and was asked to leave, sparking heated debate across social media platforms.
  • Dragon Con currently lacks a clear public policy addressing A.I. art in its Artist Alley or exhibition guidelines.
  • Controversy follows past A.I. art incidents, with the Dragon Awards and Fan Expo Canada grappling with similar issues.
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 41 points 10 months ago

Is that illegal?

It’s shitty, for sure, but cops don’t usually arrest people for just being shitty.

[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 87 points 10 months ago

Per the comments on the article:

  • The DragonCon policy explicitly states AI art cannot be sold and that violating that part of their policy is grounds for immediate dismissal
  • The artist refused to leave
  • The cops were called to get them to leave
[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 57 points 10 months ago

Probably refused to leave, or the situation in general was getting heated.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 39 points 10 months ago

Perfect ad placement. No notes.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

give it more of your business data!

<chef's kiss>

[-] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Good. AI garbage does not belong in art spaces.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago

Hurr durr but engineering prompts is an art!

[-] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 31 points 10 months ago

Shit clickbait. Police had nothing to do with AI and everything with that guy refusing to leave

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago

But why were they asked to leave?

[-] errer@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

Meanwhile Dragon Con’s vendor area is still half “mystery boxes.” Not much moral high ground amongst whoever is divvying out vendor spaces.

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

What kind of stuff is in the boxes? Action figures?

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

The stuff they couldn't sell the last few times before that.

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Makes sense.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah and other collectibles. Think loot boxes in real life.

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I bet the kids eat it up.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

It's not art. AI doesn't create art. It generates images.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I call it “AI output.”

Art is something made by a person as a form of expression. AI output is just AI output.

[-] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 months ago

They definitely seem to have real art on their site like the article says. I wonder if they had a mixture of things and rather than remove their AI generated stuff they fought with the management. Or they were just flat out asked to leave instead of given opportunity to fix it. I know a lot of traditional artists using AI now for posing and composition layout but they still do the panting etc. But it does look stifled sometimes. Like you can tell it’s been influenced by AI. It makes me sad. Especially since one of the artists used to be super fluid and expressive and now everything feels like they’re painting vectors :( which their merch distributor loves and encourages because it’s easier to print but I think it’s literally killed their business. I don’t think it’s “competitive” I think it’s convenient for a select few and killed their creativity. Fuck AI art.

[-] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago

How do we know they sold AI generated images? Seems all the images on their site is hand made at least.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, throw him out, you also don't let people to run with cars on running competitions, so why would genAI art be better?

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I am bothered by this. Has there been any confirmation that this vendor was trying to sell AI output rather than art, or was it just an accusation? I’ve seen too many witch hunts, false positives, and worse to blindly accept an AI accusation, and even the article doesn’t seem clear on it.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
119 points (95.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7577 readers
561 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS