top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 183 points 3 years ago (125 children)

Everyone here is arguing the benefits of prohibition. I'm just interested to know how much money Rishi (and/or his family members/friends/donors) have invested in vaping and nicotine alternatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 125 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 3 years ago (95 children)

    It always confuses me to learn that when people want to ban smoking it somehow means ban "cigarettes" and not "nicotine"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 95 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (14 children)

    Because smoking is WILDLY more harmful than vaping.

    Yes vaping has SOME health risks, but it's like saying drinking tea and drinking four loko are just as bad because they both have caffeine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (26 children)

    Well what's wrong with nicotine? In itself it's not worse than booze. It's all the other crap they add that makes it so terrible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (53 replies)
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 108 points 3 years ago (55 children)

    I see angry wankers want to moan for the sake of moaning.

    Eliminating smoking is a goos thing! I'll take my wins whenever possible, doesn't happen all that often.

  • source
  • hideshow 55 child comments
  • load more comments (50 replies)
    [–] 83 points 3 years ago* (23 children)

    to create 'smoke-free' generation

    Of course, not counting the smoke, ash, and other toxic oxidized chemicals that will be kicked up by gas and diesel vehicles with his scrapping the HS2 Manchester line. What a fucking idiot. "Oh no, we brexited ourselves so hard that we're poor now and can't afford to build infrastructure that would stand to enrich multiple cities for hundreds of years!"

    Such classic smooth brained thatcherite conservatives. It's mind numbing that people keep voting for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    I mean, Sunak is a complete and utter bellend and cancelling half of HS2 is a ridiculous and nonsensical move.

    But I think that the good old idiom about broken clocks might just apply here. Smoking bans are a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 69 points 3 years ago (23 children)

    Ah yes, because making drugs illegal has worked so well in the past.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (20 children)

    Setting age limits on substance use is a little different from criminalizing possession/use. In the case of smoking, it has helped reduce rates. This is something backed by people working in public health, who also support decriminalization for possession and bringing in safe consumption sites. It's all about finding the right approach for an issue.

    I'd rather focus on calling out the OTHER bad stuff his government is doing, instead of turning this one partisan based on which party introduced it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 64 points 3 years ago (16 children)

    Smoking is redundant today. Kids are getting enough cancer from the environment already.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 63 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    Great goal but like with all other narcotics, wouldn't this just create a huge black market and thus massively fund criminal organizations?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I'm not so sure

    Cigarettes are not often seen with the same attraction as other drugs

    The draw from younger potential customers is greatly outweighed by far less harmful stuff like weed or even shrooms

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 52 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    So we would eliminate smoking the same way we eliminated drug use...by making it illegal.

    /S if necessary

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I'm generally pro legalization of drugs, but will say this is likely to be much more effective than the war on drugs ever was.

    You don't outlaw possession, just the sales age. You'll see significantly fewer new starters as time goes because after 20 years 40 year olds that can buy wont be bothered to support fresh 18 year olds looking to start a new habit or whatever. The ones that really want to start can buy from abroad without any form of punishment.

    I think it's different because I don't think anyone turns to their first cigarette looking to try and attain some new feeling. It's usually one of those things like... My friends were so I grabbed one from them and blah blah.

    I would say I'm for the progressive increase in age, and I wrestle with my own hypocrisy seeing that I support legalizing other drugs. But maybe that's rooted in the basis that I've never had a pothead or dude on shrooms negatively impact me. Cigarettes however--littered everywhere, get smoke in your face, etc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    people could easily say they hate the smell of weed - is that a good reason to outlaw?

    I keep thinking of the rat experiments where rats in cages took drugs until they died but happy rats in rat societies turned away from drugs.

    I think people take drugs, including cigarettes, to cope. If they didn't need to cope with terrible conditions, they wouldn't use the drugs (except a few outliers). To me, taking away people's cope is punching down.

    We can't get rid of tobacco like we can quaaludes or some synthetic drug. It's going to be available to people. The question is do you want to create a huge black market for it (where people can easily lace cigarettes with fentanal, bonus? ), or do you want to address the reasons that people chain smoke?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 46 points 3 years ago (24 children)

    Smoking's already dramatically fallen out of popularity with younger people, being replaced by vaping. So I don't think it really matters what they do at this point - smoking's a dinosaur waiting to die.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    From someone who has smoked and quit, I was really blind sided by how addictive nicotine was. People talk about adults and what they put in there body but nicotine really is a different monster

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Or do it like Germany: make vaping extremely expensive so people go back to smoking. Stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 3 years ago* (46 children)

    One problem: most smokers start as teens, all while it's forbidden to sell kids the cancer sticks.

    Addition: I would punish the selling of tobbaco products to kids even more, including the ability of suing the adults for damages in the future (If it won't cause a cobra problem later on), and also give the ability to non-smoking workers to sue their employers if they give smokers more breaks.

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Afaik NZ has already implemented such a rule.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 3 years ago

    He should also star making crimes illegal so that they can live in a society without crime /s.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›