top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 228 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Zelenskyy did it. Ukraine would no longer exist as a sovereign nation today if he didn't; it would have been entirely annexed into Russia right now.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 171 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Jon could absolutely destroy anyone on a debate stage. Mainly because it's a popularity contest, and he's spent his entire life learning to be popular on screen and stage. He's also a smart guy with great insight into a lot of situations.

    None of that means he would be a good president. It's a different set of skills.

    The bottom line though, would he be better than the alternative? And I hear what you're saying. Those nazi crack monkey's put on a hell of a show, how could Jon possibly do a better job? I'm not sure, but given the option, I think I'd give him a shot.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think the Jon for president thing is copium, but to be fair Jon does have two of the most important traits in a president: conviction and a good bullshit detector. Whether he'd be able to do the day to day work aside, there's no reason to believe he wouldn't be able to lead the country in a better direction in a big picture sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago

    I think Jon would have the intelligence and humility to have very qualified, intelligent people to advise and challenge him.

    My only concern for him is he would take it very seriously, and not be able to let anything go. He would burn himself out hard in 4 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 80 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    Yes, yes, yes. He’s not just a TV show host. He legitimately puts his time, money, and reputation where his mouth is. I have a lot of respect for Jon Stewart as a person with moral character, intelligence, and influence. I would advocate forcing him into the election even if he doesn’t want it. In fact, that he doesn’t want it is all the more reason to push. We need someone like him desperately.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Anybody that doesn’t want the job is imminently more qualified that anybody who does in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

    To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.

    To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.

    – Some hoopy frood

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 65 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago* (8 children)
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    God it escapes me...

    There was another politician whose only real claim to fame was some b-teir TV and movie spots..

    I think they had a cameo in home alone II

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 61 points 1 year ago* (29 children)

    Or, hear me out: we abolish the presidency. There’s absolutely no need for so much power to be vested in one person.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • load more comments (29 replies)
    [–] 57 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Americans elect a non celebrity challenge (impossible)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    If Zelensky is any indication, comedians make for excellent heads of state and ministers of war. A good leader not only has wits, but also the voice to convince people of a vision.

    Comedians have a day job of making people agree with them, without needing bribes or institution to back them.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 52 points 1 year ago*

    A lot of people here are condemning celebrity in US politics, and I get it... but at this point in time we might need someone who is already famous yet consistent and trustworthy. Stewart has shown himself to be a good person for decades. He's also politically informed, progressive, and whip smart.

    We need a candidate who wants real change for the betterment of the working class. Somehow people thought that was Trump... I guess because he said he would be, a few times? And people were hoping hard? And not looking at his track record at all? Also racism? More importantly though: people didn't think that candidate was Harris, who got pushed through by the Democratic party and ran an uninspiring campaign. Those people didn't vote. Those people were excited about candidates like Bernie, who's track record on class issues is indefatigable. Those people could potentially be excited about Jon Stewart tearing shit down for the actually betterment of the poor, and might trust that he would try.

    That's my read, anyway. A Mamdani could come along and stir up some real enthusiasm, but I think it's harder for a no-name without a proven record to win a national election. Last time that happened we ended up with Obama, and people still feel burned by his lack of progressive action.

  • source
  • [+] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (16 children)
    load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 42 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Just have him be White House Spokesperson. Perfect role for him.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Exactly this.

    The Dems are so bereft of charismatic folks in their ranks because their own internal power-squabbling and pressure between dusty old skeletons to keep themselves in office, that anyone who HAS the skill set has had to spend that time in the entertainment industry at best. They're so dogmatic about internal "it's your time" protocols that they would rather sink AOC and Bernie forever so that the political equivalent of Assistant Regional Managers can get promoted to Regional Manager.

    Both parties are broken to shit, and this is why Dems aren't doing a single thing to fight anything, they expect to just sit back and have it handed to them later. It'll be too late by then. We need an entire wave of new blood. Fuck this 2-party system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    No.

    Don't do this. Let him be. Jon deserves a break, not more work

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Read the article. This has come up before and Jon always says no. Here he implies he's considering pretty explicitly. Zelensky has done pretty well for a man who played penis piano on TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hasan’s reflexive response — please, no more reality hosts — came with one notable exception: “Unless Jon, you’re thinking of throwing your hat in the ring… we can talk about that.”

    Stewart laughed. He didn’t deny it. He didn’t wave it off. He just leaned back, smiled, and chuckled — the kind of non-answer that fuels speculation.

    You’re saying this is Jon Stewart explicitly implying that he’s considering a run?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'd normally say "hells no, stop electing celebrities!" but this is a person who is actually politically informed (savvy even) and at this point possibly bthenonoy person why might get the US out of this miserable shit it's in and on to a path towards an actual representative democracy.

    If anything, Jon Stewart might be the only person able to get the US to stop electing celebrities in the first place

    So yeah, Jon 2028!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 38 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    How the fuck could he be worse than some cunt politician?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (25 children)

    I'm going to go with no. I appreciate John Stewart, but can we please stop having TV stars run for office? Same goes for career politicians.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • load more comments (21 replies)
    [–] 30 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Why not? The fuck Ronnie Reagan, an actor, made it into office. Like many have indicated below Zelensky is another good example. If Stewart runs, who should be his running mate. I would choose AOC.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 30 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    It's so cute that Americans think there will be a 2028 election.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Stuart Colbert 28'! My fingers would break I'd vote so hard for that.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    President John Stewart

    Vice President Stephen Colbert

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    I'd vote for him. Even when we disagree on stuff-- a rarity-- he is still leagues better than anyone in the Pedo Party. John is more of a man and a human being than that scum sucking pig drumple thinskin could ever be.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Why the fuck are people so obsessed with celebrities? Elect someone actually competent for the job. Idiots.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    He's way too smart to accept that job.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Jon himself is not behind this idea, he constantly reminds people he's just a comedian. We need to stop confusing age, fame, whiteness, and being male with actual experience.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    Counterpoint from Douglas Adams:

    The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.

    I am 100% in favor of Jon Stewart for president, especially if he refuses to run.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›