all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 1 year ago

Over and over again, I'm amazed at how much they've managed to make machines able to do from just a vague description. That GPT 5 demo where it coded up a toy airfoil app from nothing was incredible.

And I'm just so, so exhausted by all the people who are convinced these things actually work in human terms, that their outputs are good enough to be usable, that you can use them as a reliable source of information or creativity. The GPT demo's idea of how airplanes generate lift was still just wrong.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    AI slop

    The list of multiple Rs, according to Gemini:

    ...
    Pennsylvania (2)
    ...
    Wyoming (2)
    ...
    Rhode Island (1)
    Washington (1)
    

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    ChatGPT actually has an old-timey accent and pronounced it “Warshington” so it does actually have an R in it

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Incredibly, when I asked Gemini 2.5 Pro the same question, it replied that 40 states have the letter R. After listing all the states that it thought had the letter R, it ended the response with “The 10 states that do not have the letter ‘t’ are,” and replied with a list of 27 different states. I never asked about T.

    data-laughing

    That rules so fucking much

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    When you think about it, LLM models are really just search engines with a different wrapper.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    And this is why I don’t differentiate marketing and capitalism

  • source