So, the guy being played by Newman is clearly a huge douchebag, but really, what he's doing isn't THAT BAD when you consider the fact he isn't aware that the toys are sentient.

Some nerd swipes a rare toy at a yard sale and tries to sell it to a Japanese museum, okay dick move but also not something I'd argue he deserves to have his entire career destroyed over. Yet we're supposed to root for his downfall because he actually kidnapped a sapient being, but HE DIDN'T KNOW THAT!

Same thing with Sid in the first movie. Yeah his propensity for mangling his toys perhaps suggests some mental health problems that should be addressed, but they are from his perspective inanimate objects. The Toy Story movies ask you to pass moral judgement on humans for injustices they inflict on thing that are inanimate from their perspective, only because we the audience are aware that secretly they are in fact living being with wills of their own. But that fact is something the toys intentionally keep hidden from humans, HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO KNOW IT'S WRONG TO THROW AWAY MY RATTY OLD TEDDY BEAR IF I'M NOT AWARE IT HAS A SOUL!?!?!?!?

all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Everything has a soul

Bananas have souls

Monkeys have souls

Mine carts have souls

Sorry, I'm playing Donkey Kong Country

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    The form of plastic, for instance, is altered if a toy is made out of it. Nevertheless the toy continues to be plastic, an ordinary, sensuous thing. But as soon as it emerges as a commodity, it changes into a thing which transcends sensuousness. It not only stands with its feet on the ground, but, in relation to all other commodities, it stands on its head, and evolves out of its plastic brain grotesque ideas

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's to plant the idea that we should have emotional connections to inanimate objects.

    Consoooooom!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago*

    raises hand I have emotional connections to inanimate objects

    Incidentally this makes me the kind of consumer that companies hate, and make me hate them back. I still remember when some Apple exec got up on stage and said "we expect our customers to be buying a new computer every 3-4 years" (and that's why we won't build robust computers that are affordable to repair and maintain at home and can be basically bricked by a speck of dust). Fuck that. Today I'm still using my 13-year-old apple laptop every day for all my main tasks and I refuse to buy a new computer because I am heavily emotionally bonded with it. And yes, it's old, components do have finite lifespans.

    Key mechanism breaks? Oh no, you poor thing, I'll replace the scissor switch for a component that costs less than a dollar.

    Fan breaks? Oh no, my poor little friend, you're sick! I will get you a new fan for $15 bucks and do the surgery to swap out the broken fan.

    Battery fails? You poor thing, I'll get you a good quality replacement (pricier, but still markedly cheaper than a new machine. They glue the batteries into the new machines and make it difficult to replace them! But on my model, it's just a few screws to replace it).

    Hard drive dies? Well, it was probably time to graduate you to an SSD anyway, and SSDs have gotten cheap.

    This also means I refuse to buy a new computer from Apple ever until they start making robust and repairable computers again (they will never) because I simply cannot afford to bond to a machine whose keyboard can become ruined by a speck of dust getting into it and then needing $800 worth of repairs.

    I'm careful what I buy, because I don't want to bond with something and then be stuck with it. Only the worthy get to win their way into my heart.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I feel like having an emotional connection to inanimate objects make you want to consume less. Litteraly the reason I installed Linux on my old laptop

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [+] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    In a perverse way this almost makes the atrocious movie Food Party seem almost like clever satire. If we embrace this cartoon idea that all objects have agency then there is basically no moral human existence, since eating vegetables is literally murder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [+] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO KNOW IT'S WRONG TO THROW AWAY MY RATTY OLD TEDDY BEAR IF I'M NOT AWARE IT HAS A SOUL!?!?!?!?

    this incident will be reported ✍️

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think you're supposed to think he's an asshole for stealing something he doesn't need from a child.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago
    [–] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    This is just "I didn't realize it was bad to enslave people because I didn't think they were sentient" through another lens, tbh.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're not wrong but Toy Story is pro slavery and always has been

    The toys are sentient but they have no agency of their own, they only want to be property of a child, they're slaves who want to be slaves and hide their own sentience behind a vast conspiracy

    The entire premise of Toy Story has rubbed me the wrong way since I was a kid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Toy Story 4(?) is about toys who build their own society without kids and live independently.

    It’s also a horror film about a 5 year old child capable of creating sentient lifeforms that do not consent to their own existence and become immediately suicidal.

    These films are super messed up, based on a concept that did not need to be dived further into.

  • source
  • parent