Like an estimated two-thirds of the world’s population, I don’t digest lactose well, which makes the occasional latte an especially pricey proposition. So it was a pleasant surprise when, shortly after moving to San Francisco, I ordered a drink at Blue Bottle Coffee and didn’t have to ask—or pay extra—for a milk alternative. Since 2022, the once Oakland-based, now Nestlé-owned cafe chain has defaulted to oat milk, both to cut carbon emissions and because lots of its affluent-tending customers were already choosing it as their go-to.

Plant-based milks, a multibillion-dollar global market, aren’t just good for the lactose intolerant: They’re also better for the climate. Dairy cows belch a lot of methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide; they contribute at least 7 percent of US methane output, the equivalent emissions of 10 million cars. Cattle need a lot of room to graze, too: Plant-based milks use about a tenth as much land to produce the same quantity of milk. And it takes almost a thousand gallons of water to manufacture a gallon of dairy milk—four times the water cost of alt-milk from oats or soy.

But if climate concerns push us toward the alt-milk aisle, dairy still has price on its side. Even though plant-based milks are generally much less resource-intensive, they’re often more expensive. Walk into any Starbucks, and you’ll likely pay around 70 cents extra for nondairy options.

. Dairy’s affordability edge, explains María Mascaraque, an analyst at market research firm Euromonitor International, relies on the industry’s ability to produce “at larger volumes, which drives down the cost per carton.” American demand for milk alternatives, though expected to grow by 10 percent a year through 2030, can’t beat those economies of scale. (Globally, alt-milks aren’t new on the scene—coconut milk is even mentioned in the Sanskrit epic Mahābhārata, which is thousands of years old.)

What else contributes to cow milk’s dominance? Dairy farmers are “political favorites,” says Daniel Sumner, a University of California, Davis, agricultural economist. In addition to support like the “Dairy Checkoff,” a joint government-industry program to promote milk products (including the “Got Milk?” campaign), they’ve long raked in direct subsidies currently worth around $1 billion a year.

Big Milk fights hard to maintain those benefits, spending more than $7 million a year on lobbying. That might help explain why the US Department of Agriculture has talked around the climate virtues of meat and dairy alternatives, refusing to factor sustainability into its dietary guidelines—and why it has featured content, such as a 2013 article by then–Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, trumpeting the dairy industry as “leading the way in sustainable innovation.”

But the USDA doesn’t directly support plant-based milk. It does subsidize some alt-milk ingredients—soybean producers, like dairy, net close to $1 billion a year on average, but that crop largely goes to feeding meat- and dairy-producing livestock and extracting oil. A 2021 report by industry analysts Mintec Limited and Frost Procurement Adventurer also notes that, while the inputs for dairy (such as cattle feed) for dairy are a little more expensive than typical plant-milk ingredients, plant alternatives face higher manufacturing costs. Alt-milk makers, Sumner says, may also have thinner profit margins: Their “strategy for growth is advertisement and promotion and publicity,” which isn’t cheap.

Starbucks, though, does benefit from economies of scale. In Europe, the company is slowly dropping premiums for alt-milks, a move it attributes to wanting to lower corporate emissions. “Market-level conditions allow us to move more quickly” than other companies, a spokesperson for the coffee giant told me, but didn’t say if or when the price drop would happen elsewhere.

In the United States, meanwhile, it’s a waiting game to see whether the government or corporations drive down alt-milk costs. Currently, Sumner says, plant-based milk producers operate under an assumption that “price isn’t the main thing” for their buyers—as long as enough privileged consumers will pay up, alt-milk can fill a premium niche. But it’s going to take a bigger market than that to make real progress in curbing emissions from food.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 113 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Need to keep the ag subsidies flowing so that rural areas keep voting conservative

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The industry got too big and too reliant on subsidies. A reckoning will occur at some point, it's just a matter of whether it's announced ahead of time or surprises everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Every day the reckoning will be worse than it would have been the day before. That's why it should be planned and not A) ripped off like a bandaid or B) have it fail on its own.

    Right now the government is doing practically the opposite and reassuring and strengthening the bandaid despite the inevitable need for it to come off.

    I get it. I'm also on board with UBI. Hell, I'm even a vegan that isn't calling for an immediate end to all subsidies for the ag industry even though a vast majority of it is in support of a practice that I believe to be highly unethical and horrendous. But I get that it can't change overnight, but that doesn't mean to keep kicking the can down the road either.

    The human cost then will be more than the human cost now. It just will be "future" humans instead of the current ones so they so keep supporting it and making it someone else's problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    It's not as if Democrats don't also throw plenty of bones to farmers.

    Even if the farmers themselves are likely to be relatively conservative, they're such a politically sympathetic group that no one wants to be seen as "going after hard-working real American farmers!". Things like the Iowa caucuses playing a huge role in national politics don't help either (although the Dems have thankfully killed that).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 112 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    One thing nobody has commented on - how that article slips in a seemingly positive mention of Nestlé (they own the cafe that uses plant milks). That raised my eyebrows.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 57 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    The dairy lobby in the US is huge money. If you ever want to know why we're making a seemingly stupid decision follow the money, look at the entrenched interests and read some history. We subsidize dairy farmers because we used to subsidize dairy farmers and they spent a bunch of their earnings lobbying for more subsidies.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 52 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    Except almonds. Almonds are terrible water wasters, and mostly grown in California where they can least afford the water.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    Still more efficient on resource utilization than animal agriculture. If you hate almond milk for that reason, you should want the dairy industry completely abolished.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [+] 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (15 children)
  • [–] [S] 28 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    TIL industries create the demand for these products, not consumers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago (20 children)

    My personal theory is that we subsidize dairy not for the milk, but for the cheese. As far as I'm aware you can't make cheese out of plant milks, and we've gotten pretty reliant on cheese as a source of protein and other nutrients in our American diets - especially among children and lower income diets.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    You can make plant-based cheeses. And some of them are pretty good. But they lack all of the same properties. Like, you can get a cheese that that when hot will stretch a little bit like the cheese on a pizza, but as it cools off it loses all of that elasticity and is not great for lukewarm pizza. You can get cheese that is pretty decent for lukewarm and hot pizza, but it doesn't have that stretch. It more just rips apart. And you definitely don't have the span of "flavors" of cheese or whatever you'd call it. Some of the big ones, sure, but again, they don't have all the same physical properties.

    I don't mind the loss of those properties, but many people do.

    Cheese isn't a great source for protein compared to beans in regards to price though.

    Honestly, I think we subsidize the dairy industry simply because they've been lobbying so long. Meat is subsidized too. It's the one market that the conservatives are fine with ignoring the mantra of "free market" and support regulating the hell out of it in whatever way supports the "farmers" (big farm is nothing like the labeling suggests and is all headed by big guys in suits who likely never have been on a farm in their life).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 34 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Probably because everyone tried only the shittiest alt-malks, assume they are all bad, and somehow don't get heartburn and diarrhea and gunky mouth and throat feel from cow milk. I save all my lactose intolerance suffering for cheese and ice cream.

    Seriously though it's the same as people that say only bad things about tofu but have only eaten white American 'recipes' that genuinely suck. Meanwhile Asians happily inhaling literal tons of it prepared in actually good meals. Try making bread from scratch without salt (or salty ingredients) and that's what tofu foods for the white market remind me of.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (12 children)

    I had this fantastic plant-based milk product on my store shelves called "Not Milk". I really enjoyed it. Had this mild coconut flavor which might turn off some (not me) but anyway, it's gone now because it was too expensive for the market I'm in.

    Meanwhile gallons of milk flow for the same purpose, only subsidized for under half the cost per ounce.

    As we do, we stifle innovation ourselves based on our past.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because lots of people in your country drink it, like it, and even more eat things made from it. Like cheese.

    "Two thirds of people can't tolerate lactose" is utterly fucking meaningless in this context. Most of those are in Asia. Last I checked, it was countries giving out subsidies, not some nebulous world council.

    And nearly all farming gets subsidised, because that reduces reliance on external countries. You've seen what capitalism did to housing. You don't want that to happen to food.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    My takeaway from this is that Nestle probably doesn't own any dairy companies, but probably does own a plant that makes oat milk. They keep all the profit in their own ecosystem by buying their supplies from themself and then get to tell us how green and thoughtful they are.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (21 children)

    I prefer plant-based milk over dairy, it tastes better and it lasts longer. I tried plant based milk years ago and never went back. I've tried cashew, macadamia, rice, soy, almond, coconut, oat, and sunflower. Some of my favorites are vanilla almond, dark chocolate almond and cashew, vanilla macadamia, and vanilla coconut. My family still buys dairy milk, but we always bought plant-based butter. I buy cream cheese to use as bread spread.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (30 children)

    Are there actual studies showing that plant-based alternatives are better for health (for individuals that digest lactose just fine like me) ?

    I switched to alt-milks for ecological reason but media keep talking about the negative health effects of «ultra-transformed food», which alt-milk very much sounds like...

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • load more comments (30 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 17 points 2 years ago (21 children)
    load more comments (21 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (55 children)

    Because most plant juice tastes like shit and has the wrong mouth-feel for most things we use cow milk for. Its not rocket surgery.

  • source
  • hideshow 55 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I'm not vegan or even vegetarian, so I feel pretty impartial on this. My partner uses oat milk for their coffee, and over the years I just got used to using it straight, or in cereals, etc. Now I greatly prefer it. It's just "milk" for me now.

    Never thought it would happen, but getting cow milk when I'm out feels off - that mouth-feel you mention; just doesn't sit right anymore. It really is an acquired taste.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (50 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    I don't see why dairy should be subsidized but some plant milks aren't exactly environmentally friendly either. The best can be said is they're better than dairy, assuming the same land could be used for both. But they can be devastating in their own right. E.g. to grow 1 almond (i.e. one kernel) takes over 3 gallons of water. Other crops used to make milk like oats have lower water consumption.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    I see soy/oat/rice milk as their own thing, instead of a direct cow milk substitute/replacement.

    There are many, many dairy product that are important as food or ingredients to other foods such as butter, yogurt, ice cream, cream, infant formula, and various cheeses that cannot be replaced directly by plant based alternatives.

    And also, if you don't like milk, try getting one of those unhomoginized milk in glass bottles that's usually directly bottled by local farms. You have to shake a lot to get the cream on top dissolved again, but there is nothing that's quite like an ice cold cup of that.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›