For the uninitiated, generally NSFW is for sexual contents and NSFL is for gory contents. People may want to see one but not see the other at any time for any reason. I have seen this feature requested over the years in Reddit but it never happens. Maybe now some instance can finally implement it?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 276 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (12 children)

Wouldn't it be better to have more specific tags like movies? e.g. "Sexual content", "Gore", "Death", "Violence" or for content that you truly want to avoid; "US Politics".

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 137 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (14 children)

    It would be wonderful with something more granular than "NSFW"...

    I would love if we got something even more granular like a "Content Warning: ".

    Examples:

    • Content Warning: nudity - might be a painting with nude people, might be a photo of nude people, in essence if it isn't porn, but there's exposed genitals, butts or breasts.
    • Content Warning: porn - you can probably guess...
    • Content Warning: gore - images with gore, people missing body parts, often dead as well.
    • Content Warning: death - images with people dying, but without gore.
    • Content Warning: blood - images with some blood, but no death or gore. (often seen in news articles)
    • Content Warning: violence - people fighting, but without turning bloody.

    These could of course be expanded with many more categories if need be.

    EDIT: added violence by request

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 123 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I would have thought that such a feature would be completely uncontroversial. Really weird that some people seem resistant to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 3 years ago

    Most of the resistance to it on Reddit was because NSFL content was technically not allowed on the site at all and adding a specific tag for NSFL material could be seen at legitimizing it. But they didn't heavily moderate it either so I don't see the point in refusing a tag for it if they're not going to do anything about it themselves either.
    What really blows my mind though is the subset of people that want a NSFW tag to mean Gore/Death and a separate PORN tag for titties and such. I mean, we already have established terms for those so why not stick with what everyone already knows them by?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 82 points 3 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 69 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Mate we can't even hide posts

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    Having gone through the code a bit, the NSFW handling looks very baked in, so it's not a small ask. The smart approach would be to add an arbitrary tag system and handle it that way.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Is that the smart approach, or the easier approach?

    I just got done reading a whole diatribe on how everything sucks because the code for everything is just duck tape on top of duck tape.

    https://tonsky.me/blog/disenchantment/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    I think it's both. Instead of trying to update the codebase with one new database attributes for each conceivable way to tag content, you simply put in facilities to abstract that - "show only posts with tag foobar", "hide all posts with tag foobar".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    I don't care about Reddit (or about growing Lemmy) as much as the average post I see in Lemmy, but if you wanted to migrate people from the former to the latter this is one of the easier ways to help do it. It's one of those small quality of life things that are asked for periodically. If Lemmy had it it'd be mentioned in Reddit every time people are pissed with the site (which is every day for most sites, including Reddit). It'd be free mouth to mouth word of mouth (being ESL is funny sometimes) publicity for Lemmy

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 3 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 37 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Yes please and just call it what it is! "Brutal" and "sexual" feg. Because I for one work in a sex fight fetish porn production studio so to me all of this is very sfw.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 37 points 3 years ago

    The ActivityPub interface allows it to my knowledge. It's just not widely used.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 3 years ago

    This is a good idea, anyone who thinks otherwise hasn't stumbled upon a guy getting his head chopped off when they didn't want to see it.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago

    Is this a protocol or a client issue? Would absolutely love to see it.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago
    [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    I think a tag system as suggested by others makes the most sense, as NSFW and NSFL aren't mutually exclusive.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›