top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 151 points 1 year ago* (46 children)
  • [+] 59 points 1 year ago (29 children)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The cheaper energy becomes, the more of a threat it is to literally all of the world's heirarchies of power. The people at the top that benefit most from these heirarchies and who have the most control are also the most disincentivized from finding a solution that makes energy cheaper for all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Solar is already a way cheaper way to make energy. Fossil fuels for electrical energy are only profitable due to large government handouts and steep tarries on Chinese electronics such as solar panels. Economic forces always win so renewables powering most of the grid is inevitable.

    The real issue is that vehicles and aircraft need something with equivalent energy density and battery technology just isn't that good yet and will take a long time to get that good.

    The other thing is economically it's cheaper to run a lot of ff powered devices at a higher rate than to invest in a replacement to run at a lower rate. The roi just isn't goof enough. Eg Almost all new heating systems are heat pumps but the economic cost of replacing a gas heater with a heat pump just isn't worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    For the record, the current technology we have to capture renewable energy is not capable of supporting the civilization we have built compared to how efficient oil and natural gas are as energy-dense molecules. Only very recently has battery technology come far enough to make it worth it to move a semi-truck any reasonable distance, but cargo ships are still going to be difficult to replace and account for a huge amount of pollution, as well as commerce we depend on. So it's not a "slightly better profit margin", as it would range from a literal decimation of society to straight up impossible to cut out all fossil fuels today.

    But we should have started a global, methodical transition over 40 years ago, and the free market control over government and media has systematically prevented that. And THAT is unacceptable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 97 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
    [+] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It’s common sense, but obfuscated by those still spending millions to deny climate change while the world literally burns around us. Gaslighting is a hell of a propaganda technique.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I was talking to a coworker at my last job about how fracking introduces dangerous chemical into the water supply, and a random guy we never talk to came up and said “OH YOU’RE WRONG ABOUT FRACKING” like his job depended on it… we were not at all related to fracking

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have experienced earthquakes. In Kansas City, Missouri. One had an epicenter near Stillwater, Oklahoma.

    That’s not supposed to happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Using fracking if you could have electric cars shows that it is all about spoiling ground water.

    This is the preparation for selling water to everybody.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Everyone not being paid to do it would tell you it's a bad idea. They break rocks in the substrata with no idea of how it will go or what effects it might have. Awuafers have been poisoned with natural gas, water tables have been ruined and misdirected. When the well is no longer profitable, they "cap" it and move on to greener pastures, letting the remaining gas bleed off into the environment unchecked. There are dozens of problems with fracking, but gas go boom so...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Is this "fracking"?

    "Fracking (also known as hydraulic fracturing, fracing, hydrofracturing, or hydrofracking) is a well stimulation technique involving the fracturing of formations in bedrock by a pressurized liquid."


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fracking

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Good luck finding land that is not near fracking sites. It's been done basically everywhere, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    yes and no. You would like to do it in relatively cheap and less populated area, and where cracks are a bit closer to surface (you do not want to drill a lot, as that would not be economically beneficial)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    And still there's politicians out there saying things like "I will not ban fracking. I did not as vice president. In fact, I cast the tie-breaking vote to open up more fracking leases". Playing with people's lives just to make a buck. Really shows they're not beholden to the people but to the owning class.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    that's BS there's plenty of studies that shows how fracking is very healthy (for the shareholders)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Those kids are very bad people, at least one of them has links to the MS-13 gang.

    And the others had shared sensitive pokemon information with that one. biggest threat to national security.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Adding more data to a conclusion every reasonable person knows has been happening for far too long.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)

    water is wet

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    But my freedom...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›