all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

waking up to tucker and n.korea being voice of reason while democrats are campaigning for pouring napalm on fire started by extreme right wingers of a genocider cult nation.

man everyday seems like world has become an absurdist drama. the obama years seems like they never happened

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    DPRK has always been the voice of reason though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Which is why the USA will be emulating their economy 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean if the US did that people would have jobs, food, housing, and healthcare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Even the harshest critics of the DPRK acknowledge that it has universal healthcare, housing, pretty much no unemployment (if any), and at this point, food. The Arduous March is over. That doesn't mean the DPRK is a magical paradise or anything, but that's in a state that was bombed into oblivion and was the target of genocide. If the US adopted more DPRK economic policies, then it would indeed see the improvements Yogthos listed.

    I don't really think you're owning anyone here, it's just coming across as you jumping to insults when you've been confronted with an alternate viewpoint instead of trying to do any research or understanding. You just jump to "Marxism bad, Marxists unintelligent."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'd consider that an insult if I respected the political analysis of anyone who uses 'tankie' as a substitute for thought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    While there is something understandable about partially wishing for it, I don't think anyone is going to lead a genocidal strategic bombing campaign against the United States to level every manmade structure taller than knee height before promptly having 95% of the planet embargo them for 75 years, so I doubt the US can emulate the DPRK's economic situation too well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That level of isolation is the goal. Economic joke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I don't even understand what you're insinuating. The DPRK's goal is to be sanctioned? They wouldn't be doing things differently if they weren't sanctioned? You know they violate the sanctions constantly, and often it's just to do some small amount of normal trade, right?

    I don't like Juche, but the point of it in this context isn't to avoid trading with countries, and indeed to considers it better to be able to trade with countries. The goal is to be able to survive not being able to trade in the case where that's the unfortunate reality, something that was only solidified by the experience of the Arduous March. Strategically, it is obviously something they should be maintaining and one of the main reasons they survived.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's insane. Israel struck first, blatantly and obviously, and it was reported as such initially. But it feels like by now the mainstream narrative has become "well who's to say who really struck first?"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Of course they are. They’re working to manufacture our consent to regime change in Iran, which they’ve wanted since 1978 when their puppet regime was overthrown. It’s 2003 all over again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    "The international community is strictly watching the US and Western forces fanning up the flames of war

    Ooh burn!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don’t they know that the G7 is the international community?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Side note: It never occurred me that the Family Guy card meme has the top section full-on #FFFFFF white.

    That's not a person, that's a ghost.

    I have a hunch that racist people would be hard to haunt because they'd just see you as a white person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago*

    And how could anyone seriously disagree? It's so blatantly obviously the truth. The sheer amount of propaganda in Western media is just ridiculous in comparison.

  • source
  • [+] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Because it has every right to be that way?

    "The number of Korean dead, injured or missing by war's end approached three million, ten percent of the overall population. The majority of those killed were in the North, which had half of the population of the South; although the DPRK does not have official figures, possibly twelve to fifteen percent of the population was killed in the war, a figure close to or surpassing the proportion of Soviet citizens killed in World War II...

    Russian accusations of indiscriminate attacks on civilian targets did not register with the Americans at all. But for the North Koreans, living in fear of B-29 attacks for nearly three years, including the possibility of atomic bombs, the American air war left a deep and lasting impression. The DPRK government never forgot the lesson of North Korea's vulnerability to American air attack, and for half a century after the Armistice continued to strengthen anti-aircraft defenses, build underground installations, and eventually develop nuclear weapons to ensure that North Korea would not find itself in such a position again... The war against the United States, more than any other single factor, gave North Koreans a collective sense of anxiety and fear of outside threats that would continue long after the war's end."

    • Charles Armstrong, The Destruction and Reconstruction of North Korea
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Huh? It sounded like you were saying they were sanctioned for a reason because of supporting the resistance. I was saying they have every reason to support and fight against America and their dogs.

    Unless you mean it in a "they were sanctioned because they were based" way, then I get it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Are they wrong?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Just when I thought this timeline couldn't get any weirder, I've agreed with MTG & North Korea in the same week.

  • source
  • DPRK, the voice of reason.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    NK was so right about getting nukes.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    LABAYK YA KIM JUNG UN

  • source