429
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

(Somewhat unrelated to the subject, but I felt like writing my thoughts on Iran in general.)

Iran being a Shia theocracy seems repressive and backwards to us, and surely they are as theocracies tend to be. This means that thinking about Iran westerners tend to think they themselves are on the good side, while Iran is on the bad side. But this is fundamentally wrong and the west is clearly the bad actor, given that it does not have any legitimate interests in the area and only engaged for imperialistic reasons.

If you look at Iran's history you'll learn that the Islamic Revolution of Iran was a response to western influences, and those western influences came along with the 1953 coup d'etat. And this coup d'état was supported by the US & UK. And the only reason this was done was for the purpose of oil. It was in reaction to Iran trying to nationalize it's oil industry, which obviously was a good idea, but bad for the western imperialists. So you install a puppet regime, that begs for a revolution, and surprise surpise, there's a revolution and it happens to be religious and conservative. So ever since the people of Iran have been stuck with it's theocracy, Undeniably this is in part the fault of the West.

Then of course there is the anti-Israel stance of Iran, which is constantly used as proof of Iran being evil. But if just for a second you try to look at Israel from the perspective of someone from the Middle East, you'll see that Israel is a colonial state, founded by zionists who from the very start commited ethnic cleansing to secure their state. The Nakba isn't talked about much in the west, but just try to imagine a similar event happening in your region of the world by foreign powers, and you'll understand the impact that would have. That is not forgotten after a few decades, especially because Israel is still driving people from their lands and colonizing it till this very day. This isn't ancient history, this is in the present. They even returned to committing genocide all over again. Also, Israel has been the base for the US influence in the region and all the wars and interventions that come with that. How can you possibly expect Iran to not view Israel as their mortal enemy? Just imagine a Middle Eastern colonial state located in Europe or the US, created by ethnic cleansing the local population. We'd view that state as a mortal enemy and want to drive these people of our lands. I am not saying this is the proper thing to do, I am saying it's obvious that this sentiment is broadly shared. It's hardly surprising. Victims tend to have harsh views of those who attacked them.

And Iran is being attacked again, supposedly for developing nuclear weapons. Meanwhile Israel has had nuclear weapons since the 60s. But in the views of westerners this is not a problem, because Israel is good, being a democracy and all that, while Iran is bad, being a theocracy. But these are all just western frames. Why in the world would a bomb be in safe hands with a hyperagressive colonial ethnostate that has repeatedly engaged in ethnic cleanings? But not in the hands of an admittedly backwards, conservative theocracy, that wants to secure itself from western imperialism. The Iranian interest in having a bomb seems completely reasonable actually. Again, just imagine a Middle Eastern colonial hyperagressive ethnostate founded by the ethnic cleansing of your local communities. And now they have nuclear bombs. And not only that, Middle Easterns powers are constantly engaging in wars all across your region. Would it be unreasonable for you to also want a nuclear bomb in such a situation? It's a no brainer.

And as much as I dislike theocracies, I can't help but think that if the west wasn't as imperialist as we have been and still are, Iran would've developed into something completely different. Iran/Persia has always been the center of regional powers, from the Achaemenids 500 bc till today. It's a beautiful country, they have a beautiful and rich history and they have an incredible culture, from the Islamic geometry, to the persian miniatures, to the incredible Sufi poets. You can't expect a proud people as they are to lie back and be dominated by western imperialism. And the more you repress people, the more they're bound to turn to theocractic conservatist populism.

TL:DR we're not the good guys, Iran are not the bad guys.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

Iran isn't needed to know that WhatsApp and meta is bad.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago

The world needs to move to digital sovereignty. It's amazing to think that a country like Iran, that is constantly under threat of the US, has so many people using Whatsapp, and probably relying on much more US software.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

American normies love tiktok ;)

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Imperialist outlet Independent privacy washing surveillance messager Meta Whatsapp. They are platforming might - that is Meta Whatsapp spokesperson - instead of privacy focused organizations such as Electronic Frontier Foundation. Painting Iran as paranoid after litterally being attacked by zioni supremacist ruledom.

Now let's be clear. Morality police is bad. Women Life Freedom. They are suppressing humanity. But this work is made to embolden Israel and western might.

Side with folks instead. We need to enblossom the folks at ground so that they can become independent of might.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago

Everyone should delete these spyware tools from their devices.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago

"We do not collect your precise location".

So... just like, to the nearest 10 metres then?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

"We do not provide bulk information to any government"

So, only on the most important politicians and nuclear scientists?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

"Just the people they're interested in"

[-] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago

I can't believe i agree with iran.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

what's unbelievable about it

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Authoritarian Islamic fundamentalism.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The "humanitarian", "right 2 protect" intervention propaganda bs is dead and buried after Gaza. Nobody loves religious extremists more than the USA, both domestically and internationally. The primary western whataboutist complain about adversaries is some "freedom of religion" crap, usually because the US is secretly funding literal jihadi butcher separatists to destabilize sovereign nations. It's always the most rabid extremists, religiously and politically that end up working for the US and then bite the hand that fed them by becoming Al Qaeda and ISIS.

Crickets about the Uyghur jihadis showing up as Al Qaeda forces in now "liberated" shariah law Syria. Crickets about Syria in general. Constant whining about a mostly secular state with far more rights than now, then sponsoring fanatics that curtail all these rights and go about chopping people's heads off in the street but not a word now because Syria aligns itself with the West, not because it's more democratic. Tons of whining about Iran instead of the head chopping Syrian jihadis type of "philanthropy".

Why are the jihadis around? Because the USA has already outlawed all the secular (usually communist) organizations in the Middle East for decades and declared them terrorists. Nobody hates secular organizations in the Middle East, Asia and Africa more than the USA because they're the least likely to become collaborators.

We can go on to the secondary whataboutist canard that involves doubting the democratic nature of foreign governments (whenever they're able to resist getting toppled by the CIA boys somehow). This has become just refusing to accept election results by default even when international observers are present and don't find any irregularities like in Venezuela. Elections that bring up some ultra right nutjob that loves Murica and turns his country to a neoliberal banana republic like Milei are always legitimate, but when Chaves and Maduro win they're always illegitimate for no reason other than not serving US interests. The US State Department main job is just lying all day long.

We should just bring up this matter to the UN after abolishing the undemocratic security council and the veto right that the USA has abused to continue genocides. Based on the American narrative both Republicans and Democrats accuse each other of stealing and rigging elections so at least one side must be correct. The US is infamous for gerrymandering and artificially preventing minorities from voting anyway (that didn't even have the right to vote until the 60s, imagine the level of hypocrisy it takes for the US apartheid to wag the finger towards anyone about elections). So maybe it should be invaded by every UN member to restore democracy since the US loves both democracy and invasions to restore it so much.

In fact I bet that plenty of Americans would actually fully welcome an invading force if its only goal would be to abolish the federal government and let them all vote for local fully sovereign governments instead. So maybe circulating this idea might come back to bite interventionists sooner than later.

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Lol... Imagine when then Normie's useage of westoid softslop turns into a national security issue

Meta got Israeli spooks within ints corporate structure. All of the mega corps have these vermin. They are every where. US spooks are are also there. But I don't get why they permit Israelis in...

[-] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

Zucc himself is a zio, they don't even need to infiltrate that one.

[-] [email protected] 282 points 2 days ago

I am asking the world to delete Meta apps. Please.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Currently trying to delete WhatsApp and people I know are giving me a hard time...

[-] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago

I have already done as you ask!

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Now, when you say "asks"...

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“We do not provide bulk information to any government.”

Millions of dollars on the other hand…

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
429 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

39018 readers
852 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS