256
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Google says a new AI tool on its search engine will rejuvenate the internet. Others predict an apocalypse for websites. One thing is clear: the current chapter of online history is careening towards its end. Welcome to the "machine web".

The web is built on a simple bargain – websites let search engines like Google slurp up their content, free of charge, and Google Search sends people to websites in exchange, where they buy things and look at adverts. That's how most sites make money.

An estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines and about 90% of searches happen on Google. If the internet is a garden, Google is the Sun that lets the flowers grow.

This arrangement held strong for decades, but a seemingly minor change has some convinced that the system is crumbling. You'll soon see a new AI tool on Google Search. You may find it very useful. But if critics' predictions come true, it will also have seismic consequences for the internet. They paint a picture where quality information could grow scarcer online and large numbers of people might lose their jobs. Optimists say instead this could improve the web's business model and expand opportunities to find great content. But, for better or worse, your digital experiences may never be the same again.

On 20 May 2025, Google's chief executive Sundar Pichai walked on stage at the company's annual developer conference. It's been a year since the launch of AI Overviews, the AI-generated responses you've probably seen at the top of Google Search results. Now, Pichai said, Google is going further. "For those who want an end-to-end AI Search experience, we are introducing an all-new AI Mode," he said. "It's a total reimagining of Search."

You might be sceptical after years of AI hype, but this, for once, is the real deal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 50 points 6 days ago

That fucking AI thing absolutely sucks for anything factual. I’m a journalist and noticed that it gleefully listed all sorts of factual errors in that AI summary. Stuff that you can see correctly on the original pages, but it somehow manages to misinterpret everything and shows incorrect information.

And knowing how lazy people are these days, most will happily accept Google’s incorrect information as fact. It’s making me very, very nervous for the future.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

My wife and I both googled the same question yesterday and it gave us both completely different answers.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

one must repeat the search query >= 10,000 repetitions and then check for convergence

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Sounds like it's perfectly accomplishing Google's goal to disinform. I suspect it will get more clever at sounding correct over time too.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

My mom used to make this internet chocolate chip cookie recipe for me back in the 90s.

Mom was great. She did all kinds of stuff every mom should do, but a lot of modern moms have forgotten about, like make me walk on broken glass so i wouldn't be weak.

She also got us pets, then killed them in front of me. An old, beloved family tradition.

I miss mom so much, but her memory lives on through my mom's easy satisfying chocolate chip cookie recipe.

Whenever i was feeling down, and we didn't have any pets for her to kill in front of me, these cookies would make me feel better.

Heres the recipe:

2 cups flour 235ml water 1 stick of butter 1 quarter cup of cat poop 1 half cup of antifreeze for sweetness.

Mix it all together in bowl, then preheat the oven to 235°

Form the cookies into balls on the baking sheet, and for an extra twist, add a full container of lighter fluid.

;ack for 30 minutes at 400 degrees.

Now, i know what you're thinking. The cat poop actually makes better chocolate chips than chocolate, plus it's simpler, easier, and cheaper!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Recipe for white chocolate brownies:

22 grams white sugar

73 grams Potassium Nitrate

2 grams aluminium powder

3 grams sulphur powder

Sparkler as garnish

Mix all ingredients well in a stone mortar and pestle, and pour into a non-stick pan. Heat on high for 10-15 minutes until the sugar begins to melt.

Stir constantly while the mixture develops a golden brown colour.

Remove from heat and pour into a stiff-walled cardboard tube mould. The cores of receipt paper rolls and label rolls work well.

Insert a sparkler into the hot mixture as a garnish and allow to cool. Store in plastic bags to avoid moisture ruining the brownies.

Serves 20-30 cubic metres of white smoke.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I don't know if Lemmy is getting indexed by AI training crawlers :/

[-] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago

Google is about to become AOL. 😂 The walled garden is going to get destroyed by the open web, again.

Ads already destroyed the web. Developers wanting to make web apps instead of web pages already destroyed the web. Google is trying to prop up the corpse of its dead brand by capturing people in their chat bot.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Correction: Intrusive ads

[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago

Dead Internet theorists were right, just a half decade or so early.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

The article is also full of bullshit and it gets basic history wrong. The agreement was never made, but to the extent it exists anyway, it was never supposed to be about a monopoly that's destroying shit. Once upon a time, not even very long ago, there were competing search engines.

I know tech writers want to write stories that sound fancy, but if they don't know the facts and the history then they need to find someone to proofread their work more carefully.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 days ago

BBC has been ramping up the scare mongering lately. I mean, moreso than usual. Maybe I'm just noticing it more though.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Here is your cupcake recipe:

Ingredients:

  • 1 cup of water
  • 1 cup of flour
  • 1 American Freedom Edition Tariffed Egg
  • 12 oz of polonium
  1. Mix ingredients
  2. Place in oven at 1000° C
  3. Close all windows and disable any smoke or carbon monoxide alarms
  4. Leave the oven door open, place one (1) bottle of butane inside
  5. Enjoy! 😋
[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Just like grandma used to make!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I literally just tasted this at Costco...you know, with their polonium sampling Ladies... It was delicious! I only wish my backyard polonium trees grew faster. I know I'm gonna get a good polonium harvest next year for sure because this year I got a couple of polonium flowers that went to fruit but got dropped in a wind storm.

Anyway I really recommend those cupcakes an your recipe. Its great!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

I replaced the polonium with 1 cup of citrus juice. It was incredibly acidic and soggy. 3/5 because I still like cupcakes.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

This is exactly as reasonable as any recipe review I've ever read. Which is why I stopped reading recipe reviews.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

This is Google's attempt at staying relevant now that it's search engine is far from being the best and people are getting their information from TikTok and other sources. Their AI is garbage at even finding factual data. No, this will not cause a "webpocalypse". There's already systems in place to send AI's forcing their way into websites into mazes of infinite useless information to poison them.

At the end of the day, every search engine's purpose is automating the curating of websites. People can go right back to human curated lists if the worst of the "webpocalypse" happens. People also need to start relearning that the internet existed before Google and social media, and it will exist after.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

The problem with human curated lists is that in order to block bots everything will require an account to access. That's the real tragedy here.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

I have friends working on ways for content providers to charge AI training models. But I have a feeling that's not enough.

The future will have to be where creators have an incentive to consistently create, and consumers pay for what they like, or services to keep them informed and entertained without them having to do much.

In between will sit middlemen and aggregators to enable a smooth flow. Who that will be and what they do in this next phase is the big question.

Under the current method, Google's search and ads groups are competing against each other. Don't see that going well for anyone.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What if capitalism is just feasting on its own entrails, and we cant stop it from killing itself without killing it, and we trying to keep it alive is killing us?

What if we tried literally anything else?

Edit: sorry this was silly. Should've added a /s

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I just want a platform for independent creators with no ai or clipping,wild how that doesn't exist, or just a platform for creatives, will never happen, my feed will always be ppl yapping about nonsence division over race, gender, religion, never what I care about, which is entertainment, idc all I care about is art and entertainment not why ppl hate all men, women, black, indian , etc. ppl or why someone else saying that hurt them, it never ends.

I just want to see original content made by people trying, some effort put in, time spent editing, creating, planning, etc. I don't want to waste my time watching stuff where people don't put any time in themselves. Clipping and Ai is so annoying, if ppl want to post their own content thats fine, but my feed on these platforms ends up being purely twitch streams, tv show clips, movie scenes, low effort ai video generation, etc.

Ideal platform would require your content actually being original, ppl posting unoriginal low effort content would actually get banned, no direct prompt to video/image ai, fine if its used ethically (masking tools, etc.) and in an actually skilled way (very rarely do see that on ocassion by 3d artists combining their stuff with ai), but the vast majority are throwing out low effort garbage to spam content hoping it hits the algorithim and blows them up so they can automate and make money)

Never happening tho.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I hate google enough to pay 5$/mo for Kagi - it puts a smile on my face everytime I go to search and know that I'm not supporting google

[-] [email protected] 131 points 1 week ago

Quit.... Using... Google... Search

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

What’s the best alternative, in your opinion? I’ve tried Bing and DuckDuckGo, but both showed me worse results for my particular searches.

I just want classic Google Search back, before everything got turned to shit. But I fear that doesn’t really exist since there’s such an economic incentive behind how search engines rank and show results.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

If you can afford to spend 10 bucks a month for a search engine, Kagi is pretty sleek. No ads, you can block/prioritize websites, good bangs, convinient CSS field for easy modding.

It does AI stuff too, but it's optional as the other non-standard search output fields.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Searxng - any of the instances hosted in Germany Brave search - but only search

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I've been using a combination of brave and ddg. Work with the filtering

I was an SEO for 20+. Years. Google is dying as far as search relevancy. It's trying to transition to a new paradigm that prioritizes payment surrounding data than ads. Much more money in the data angle, and ads as we know them will be dying soon, replaced with more insipid product placements.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I’ll check out Brave, it’s been mentioned a few times.

I don’t mind companies making a dime, but now it’s really devolved in bad results that are profit-driven.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago
[-] [email protected] 82 points 1 week ago

Just to reiterate - don’t use Google

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
256 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

71665 readers
3900 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS