top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 142 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Putin will never stop being a war criminal until the day he dies. If he takes over all of Ukraine, he will move to Moldova then Georgia then Latvia then Estonia and so on.

The moment this war ends, the Russian Federation will collapse. People forget but Russia has collapsed twice in the last century by doing the same things it's doing now.

It collapsed the first time when the out of touch tyrannical Tsarist government dragged the country into a needless war (WWI) while the country was going through a crises. The country collapsed and formed the Soviet Union.

It collapsed a second time when the out of touch tyrannical communist government dragged the country into a needless war (Soviet invasion of Afghanistan) while the country was going through a crises. The country collapsed and formed the Russian Federation.

Now the same thing is happening. The country has an out touch tyrannical dictator that dragged the country into a needless war during a time of crises. Once the war is over the country will revolt and collapse once again.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, it seems authoritarianism is bad. Hopefully Russians will figure that out the next go around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    As American example shows us in real time, it's not something you just "figure out" once. Democracy requires society to always win in eternal struggle against human nature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ronald Reagan was a terrible politician, but he absolutely nailed this quote:

    Perhaps you and I have lived too long with this miracle to properly be appreciative. Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. And those in world history who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Russia has treaties with Britain since like 1904 that obligated it to engage in WWI. Thats how the murder of a Serbian devolved into a world war

    Outcome of leading to the downfall of the regime regardless, it was a little different than Afghanistan or Ukraine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago*

    Not to be thát person, but Archduke Franz Ferdinand was not a Serb, he was Austrian. Even though Austria-Hungary did annex Bosnia and Herzegovina in the late 19th century, Franz Ferdinand was not born there - in fact he was born before the annexation.

    Unless you mean his killer, but then your wording is a little off and I would say "murder BY a Serbian." Even so, the ethnicity of the murderer wasn't really as important as his target. ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    technically you don't stop being anything when you die except for alive.

    asshole when you're alive? asshole when you're dead.

    you do lose the ability to be anything but that after you doe though.

    at least until you're forgotten... which he did solidify his place in history as one of the weakest bitches in post cold war Russian history.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 137 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Wonder what Trump will do to stop this

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    He'll try to stop/derail it if he can't claim ownership of the results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The whole mineral rights stuff is going to be interesting to see play out. Because Zelenskyy, and Ukrainians in general, should very much beware Yankees bearing “gifts” at this point, because we are not the same country we were 6 months ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He’ll try to stop/derail it if he can’t claim ownership of the results.

    Trump never gave a shit about peace to begin with; he just wanted to fellate Putin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Zelenskyy: US has sent 20,000 missiles bound for Ukraine to Middle East instead

    https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2025/06/8/7516207/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Zelensky is a bit like a CEO presenting his company's prospects. He was talking like this two years ago, too.

    I personally think he's not wrong. Just - until Kremlin gang's members and their families are being caught and jailed\deported all over the globe, or at least in NATO countries, this is all bullshit. Well, maybe after failing in Ukraine they'll attack some smaller and weaker country, just to show themselves they can defeat someone. And maybe they'll try again.

    In any case - yes, that leadership keeps Russia weak, inefficient, dependent, but as everyone can see, it's also capable of destruction on scale too big to allow. So maybe some optimism should be applied and the goal be for Russia's regime to change and for it to have a democracy that may make its potential useful for everyone around. The "keeping it weak" approach, after all, has already led to Putin.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Most of all the Russians simply can't stomach a reality where they're not a feared global superpower, to such a degree that they'd rather shoot themselves in the foot and be a shithole rather than just a regular better functioning nation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The “keeping it weak” approach, after all, has already led to Putin.

    No one kept Russia weak when Soviet Union collapsed. Yeltsin brought a lot of democractic traits into Russia and it was heavily leaning towards west on multiple areas. Should they kept going on that direction they'd be a global superpower on pretty much all fronts by now, surpassing US and even China.

    But they had also pretty big internal problems and a ton of people who desired old soviet times and whatever, so we ended up with what we have today. Wikipedia has way more info and links to study it further.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeltsin brought a lot of democractic traits into Russia

    No. The democratic mechanisms started working a bit earlier than the USSR stopped existing.

    People like Sakharov, Galina Starovoitova, have your heard of such names?

    The democratic reforms happened before USSR's collapse.

    Yeltsin used that to come to power in 1991, and then kicked the ladder in 1993, and in 1999 named Putin as the next president on television. Oh, of course Putin "won" an election after that.

    And that process was actively supported by western governments, especially in 1996, with the justification that an honest democracy in Russia will lead to scary-scary communists coming back to power.

    Should they kept going on that direction they’d be a global superpower on pretty much all fronts by now, surpassing US and even China.

    Yeltsin was a dying alcoholic living uncritically and without shame by the motto "to my friends everything, to everyone else the law". They have kept going on that exact direction. That's the bloody point.

    Yeltsin usurped power in 1993. If that didn't happen and the conflict between Yeltsin and the parliament was resolved peacefully and legally (by having snap parliament and presidential elections simultaneously, so - replacing both sides of the conflict, in other words, Yeltsin would have to back the democratic claims with the democratic action of leaving the post ; that was the constitutional court's decision), then maybe. But instead Yeltsin used tanks to resolve the dispute.

    Anyway, no, even if 1993 conflict would end differently, I think surpassing Germany is possible.

    Soviet Union was an interesting part of the planet, the older generation from there can "know" and teach you all the right things, but not live by them. Talk about bravery and honor, and very correctly, but act dishonorably and be completely blind to that, talk about science and logic and critical mind and very correctly, but go to fortunetellers and believe in energies. Talk about principle, but not follow it. Never use the "thought experiment" tool freely. And so on.

    They needed lots of time to fix that - through pain. It's not been 40 years yet, if we take biblical timespans. Maybe in year 2031 Russia will finally be ready.

    But they had also pretty big internal problems and a ton of people who desired old soviet times and whatever, so we ended up with what we have today. Wikipedia has way more info and links to study it further.

    In 1991 nobody desired "old times" back. People saw how it all was degrading until falling apart. Don't you give me Wikipedia links, lol. Something should have happened for a lot of people to wish a "restoration", don't you think so? Like what I've described. And that "restoration" was provided by the same people, Yeltsin's people, with the figure of Putin and his image of a "former Soviet intelligence operative".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think that's more up to the Russian people than anyone in the west. Russians like strong men, it's a weakness in their society. Everyone outside Russia wanted it to continue to be a democracy, Russia even had a brief association with NATO while it was. But Yeltsin drank too much (alcoholism being another weakness in Russian society) and that allowed a guy like Putin to make himself a Czar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Russians like strong men, it’s a weakness in their society.

    No, it's not any more a Russian weakness than an American one, even less than a Japanese or a Chinese one.

    Especially unwise to judge Russians by American stereotypes of Russians.

    Everyone outside Russia wanted it to continue to be a democracy

    How's that compatible with supporting Yeltsin in his 1993 coup and in stealing 1996 elections?

    Russia even had a brief association with NATO while it was.

    No it didn't. Yeltsin wanted that, yes, and Putin wanted that too. Both wanted to be a big, scary country accepted to NATO and with NATO weaponry. Like Turkey, but with nukes. What both didn't want is dropping the bullshit about spheres of influence and being an equal of the USA, apparently got told by NATO that beggars are not choosers. Also wanting an association with NATO has plainly nothing to do with being a democracy or not.

    But Yeltsin drank too much (alcoholism being another weakness in Russian society) and that allowed a guy like Putin to make himself a Czar.

    I think you skipped the part where I was educating you that Yeltsin made himself Czar in 1993 and just passed it on to Putin.

    I don't really care that it breaks your narrative. Putin is a natural continuation of the western-supported and consulted regime in Russia installed in 1993. That Yeltsin presented himself as some liberator and Putin presented himself as ex Soviet intelligence are campaign pictures that mean nothing. All the trusted people around Putin are the same that Yeltsin had even before 1991. Including Putin himself.

    Alcoholism is not a bigger weakness in the Russian society than in British ones or in Sweden or in Finland.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • Our operation Spider's Web… even though they [the Russians – ed.] are furious, they understand everything – that if there are cases like the one involving 20,000 rockets [that the US had planned to send to Ukraine but redirected to the Middle East – ed.], then we'll rely on our own strength… We don't want the war to continue, but we'll fight for ourselves if that is the only way out.

    We're very close. We need strong support from the United States. The US needs unity with Europe and still needs to put pressure on Putin. He doesn't want to end the war, but he can end the war under pressure from partners. In my opinion, that gives us a chance. And this doesn't sound pessimistic at all – I'm talking about reality."

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If Operation Spiders' Web is more than just an isolated attack on Russia's air bases and is continuing to strike deep into Russian soil, then this has serious potential to finally bring Putin to the negotiating table.

    Other than that, I think this will be a bloody war of attrition that Zelenskyy has no chance of winning.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The EU is bankrolling Ukraine, Russia has no friends and no money. Ukraine will easily outlast Russia. They just need to stay put and keep defending their positions while taking out Russia's capacity to attack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Taco/fElon are Russia's friends/assets. They and their gop/maga supporters need to be kicked out of the usa government. Hopefully then, usa will return to Ukraine's side.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The good news is that literally nobody can count on those guys.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Hilariously true. Anyone who puts actual faith in those guys or relies on them for anything is insane. (Or just desperate as fuck, which Russia may be becoming.)

    I can’t help but think back to when Musk was threatening to cut off poor, remote areas in South America from Starlink over petty shit. Yall want THAT guy to be your friend? Yikes.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Keep up the good work. Russia must fail.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    But he doesn't have the cards!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I know that's sarcasm, but your comment made me think. I strongly disagree with those kinds of remarks. :)

    This war isn't like a game of Poker, where everyone is dealt from the same deck. It's more like MTG, where the real game is about who can make better strategic use of their card-buying budget.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I really hope so

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    For Putin, it's a matter of political survival.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The Russian wartime economy would, and will, utterly collapse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I agree with some commentators cleverer than me, the current state of the war economy is so extreme that it'll be crippled by both continued war and also by peace.

    The longer it goes on the worse the resolution will be

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›