top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 183 points 3 years ago (73 children)

That leaked email conveniently assumes the owner of Valve would sell it. I can't think of a reason for Gabe to do that.

  • source
  • hideshow 73 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    This is the biggest problem with Valve at the moment. They're awesome, but only because of the current leadership. Once these guys retire or die, it's very likely Valve will enshittify like every other business.

    Valve needs to be hit by regulators at some point. They just have too much market power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Money? Remember when people thought that about Mojang?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 155 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Gaben already refused to sell to EA and made it abundantly clear that we would rather let valve die than go public.

    Microsoft also just recently said they'd buy Nintendo if they could.

    All this means is that Microsoft is filthy rich and still doesn't know how to make an original quality game studio. They seem to overly rely on buying out studios and IPs that are successful to rake in more money.

    spoilerAll of which reeks of an oligigopoly and reminds me of even worse companies like Oracle and AT&T

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    The funny thing about selling valve, what would it even give for Gabe? He's already filthy rich. What more could one want with more money?

    Saying no to selling only makes sense in his position, in my opinion. At least I personally would think so. Because then you still keep what is effectively your creation, and can use it to shape the world.

    At some point you really do just have enough money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 108 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    The thought of another company buying Valve, especially one like Microsoft, makes me actually sick. I have spent so much fucking money on my Steam library at this point. If my Steam library gets jacked by some billionaire dickheads it's all over, I'm never paying for anything again.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 100 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    This is so stupid. Of course they would buy it. Valve won't sell, but let's do the click baits!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 90 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Gaben is one of the few people in tech I trust to resist the money MSFT would be willing to throw at something as successful as valve. I mean - they’re the closest thing to a trustworthy company as you can find these days.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 80 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    I like to think Gabe knows all too well the importance of remaining a private business. Publicly traded businesses are the root cause of a lot of problems in the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 66 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (5 children)

    Gaben used to work at Microsoft and left because he hated it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 60 points 3 years ago*

    Gabe has been a large proponent of avoiding the kind of consolidation that Microsoft is doing. He saw the writing on the way years ago when Valve released the Steam consoles. I don't think (and certainly hope) that he wouldn't sell.

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 3 years ago* (14 children)

    I am ruined if this happens. MS would discontinue Proton / Linux and Mac support.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 51 points 3 years ago (14 children)

    Day 1 of suddenly having the urge to keep an offline and DRM free copy of all my steam games.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 43 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    I love Steam (have 2000 or so games on it) but I realize it is only a matter of time before it gets enshittified.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    Maybe, but it's still a private company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    Yeah, there is some hope for as long as Valve isn't publicly traded. It's investors that push companies to care only for short term gains.

    Valve is not saintly, they have their own sketchy aspects like how they profit over that cosmetics trading market, but releasing the Steam Deck shows they are still thinking of the long term future of PC gaming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I imagine they would immediately drop proton and move the steam deck too some windows bs

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 39 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    It's impossible for me to understand not having enough. M$ is like some megacorp villain that wants to swallow everything

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 36 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    When one company in an industry has nearly endless cash, as Microsoft and Apple do, it is natural that everyone else would be seen as acquisition targets

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    The difference is Valve is completely privately owned, Microsoft cannot force a sale.

    With a publicly traded business, the business must be run in the interests of the shareholders, ie it must pursue profits above all else. Thus a buyer can effectively present "an offer you can't refuse", at least the business can't refuse on behalf of shareholders (maybe the shareholders could vote and refuse). With a private business the owner generally has free reign to run the business as they see fit, they could run it into the ground if they so desired.

    So it doesn't matter how much cash Microsoft or whoever have, so long as Gabe doesn't want to sell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    People would riot. GOG would have a massive influx of traffic.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 33 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Embrace, Extend, Extinguish moment

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 3 years ago

    This would be a nightmare

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago

    It's a private company that isn't for sale. There was another leak a week ago where they were trying to acquire Nintendo which IS publicly traded, but I think the private shares still control 51%, but that's old info.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    Hopefully Gabe doesn't allow that to ever happen

  • source
  • [+] 17 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 15 points 3 years ago (14 children)

    I've tried switching to Linux and didn't succeed. Nevertheless i wouldn't wanna see a Microsoft Deck with Windows 11.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›