top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 102 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Just read I the Norwegian news that two air bases in Murmansk (near the Norwegian border) were hit. If anything, this kind of strike hammers home how our support for Ukraine directly makes us safer as well.

These are planes that likely would have been used against Norway in the event of a war. Support for Ukraine is directly helping destroy equipment that otherwise could be used to attack us. We just need more people to understand this so we can get popular support for increasing our support a hundredfold.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    this is a big one!

    from telegram https://t.me/ButusovPlus/20244

    For the first time in world history, the main strategic aviation force, the carrier of nuclear weapons, was defeated right at its bases by a group drone strike. The outstanding sabotage operation of the Security Service of Ukraine will go down in all military history books, as this defeat of Russia is one of the most costly in terms of consequences and losses, which seriously reduces the number of Russia's strategic nuclear forces.

    At the moment, according to our sources, 41 strategic and military transport aircraft of the Russian Armed Forces have been hit at four bases. Some of the drones were attacked with auto-targeting, and the results of their strikes will be determined using satellite imagery.

    A group of SBU agents smuggled 150 small attack drones and 300 rounds of ammunition into Russia.

    116 drones took to the air.

    The drones were controlled via Russian telecommunication networks, using automated guidance.

    Several mobile take-off points on Russian territory were located near Russian strategic aviation bases.

    The drones were attacked from a short distance during the day in the enemy's deep rear. The air bases were covered by significant air defence forces - anti-aircraft missile systems, electronic warfare systems, and patrols with small arms. But the Russians expected nighttime attacks by heavy, large attack drones, which are clearly visible in the air, and did not expect an attack by small quadcopters during the day.

    The attack on the Olenya strategic missile base of Tu-95s was particularly successful, as the drones accurately hit the filled fuel tanks and a significant number of the aircraft burned to ashes.

    An operation of this scale and with such a huge economic and military effect, at such a high technological level, has no analogues in the world.

    It is very important that the SBU agents have successfully returned to Ukraine. Ukraine did not suffer any losses.

    Results:

    • Military equipment worth billions of dollars was destroyed;

    • strategic aircraft, which Russia does not produce, were destroyed.

    • Weakened enemy strike capabilities, as these aircraft were an important component of constant terrorist attacks on Ukrainian cities.

    • The enemy will have to spend a lot of money to strengthen the defence of its bases and facilities.

    Yes, such achievements should be recognised with the highest state award. Is it possible to award a second Hero of Ukraine to SSU leaders? Because the results are worth it.

    The heroes who directly performed such a historic task and returned with victory certainly deserve the highest title.

    Translated with DeepL (https://www.deepl.com/app/)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It is very important that the SBU agents have successfully returned to Ukraine. Ukraine did not suffer any losses.

    The fact the russian side of the border is that porous is really interesting .

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Russias border is fucking huge. These guys could have fake passports, so fly something like... idk, Moscow to Ankara, then from there back to Ukraine.

    They could have boarded flights hours after doing this attack. That's just an insane level of operational ballsiness.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The drones were controlled via Russian telecommunication networks

    *chef's kiss*

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fuckin well done lads, keep up the good work. At this rate they won’t even have enough planes to stock the carrier they can’t sail anywhere

    Slava Ukraini

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's misinformation, they can sail the carrier wherever they want.

    Provided the use enough tugboats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The one ship Ukraine should consider not sinking. It may cost Russia more by leaving it afloat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Very roughly speaking, how many comparable aircraft does Russia own, just so I can understand the extent of this attack? Sounds great either way.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    I was seeing from other online spaces that this would be about 30% of Russias strategic bomber fleet and it's accompanying aircraft like their AWACs that got hit.

    If that's the case that's a staggeringly bad day for the Russian air force, which means it's a good fucking day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I just watched a couple of videos on this attack and one thing that stood out is the AWACS - Russia has 5, but only one airworthy one and Ukraine hit that one.

    Basically, the Russian AF is blind outside of its bases. It's going to make it much more difficult for Russia to operate outside its borders.

    One report I saw says they even hit a base near the northern border with Finland. A Russian sub has possibly been promoted to artificial reef.

    Combine this attack with the two bridge collapses and the attack on Vladivostok, and Russia should be worried. Ukraine and their domestic insurgency can hit pretty much anywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Wow. Honestly kinda surprised they were that vulnerable. Doesn't Russia have any sort of CWIS systems to defend their ground based nuclear bombers and advanced radar command and control aircraft? Seems kinda important, don't you think?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They were expecting big slow drones that would take hours flying from Ukraine. Instead they got many small ones that took 18 months to arrive but were invisible until the last minute. A surprise zerg rush, when they were expecting and preparing against ultralisks.

    (My analogies are very weak today)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] [S] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Pretty much all of their air defense seems to be stationed at the front and around their oil facilities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Maybe you should stop shooting cruise missiles on Ukraine. What a fucking incredible feat!

    Slava Ukraine!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How much does it cost to replace?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Most of these cannot be replaced. They were already short on parts beforehand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So what is the expected monetary-equivalent loss taken?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 20 points 1 year ago

    Well, the A-50 and the TU-22 M3 mentioned in the article cost around 300-400 million USD each but it's not known yet how many of each type have been damaged and to what extent. Inflicting monetary damage is not as much of a priority compared to crippling Russia's ability to continue their air assaults.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Too bad so sad lol. Suck it Ruskies.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    The tankie triad is going to have an extra chip on their shoulders these upcoming days.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    Nice job, folks! Would suck to be whichever yes-man had to inform Pootie about the $7 billion in aircraft they lost in one night, a third of their ability to deliver cruise missiles.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί