β² 490 βΌ 'Russian bombers are burning en masse' β Ukraine's SBU drones hit 'more than 40' aircraft in mass attack, source claims (kyivindependent.com) submitted 1 year ago by Hubi@feddit.org to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz 76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] boreengreen@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (4 children) How much does it cost to replace? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Hubi@feddit.org [S] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children) Most of these cannot be replaced. They were already short on parts beforehand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] boreengreen@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) So what is the expected monetary-equivalent loss taken? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] Hubi@feddit.org [S] 20 points 1 year ago Well, the A-50 and the TU-22 M3 mentioned in the article cost around 300-400 million USD each but it's not known yet how many of each type have been damaged and to what extent. Inflicting monetary damage is not as much of a priority compared to crippling Russia's ability to continue their air assaults. permalink fedilink source parent [β] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 25 points 1 year ago Literally irreplaceable as Russia can't build these planes anymore. The dollar value is easily in the billions. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Hubi@feddit.org [S] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children) Most of these cannot be replaced. They were already short on parts beforehand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] boreengreen@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) So what is the expected monetary-equivalent loss taken? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] Hubi@feddit.org [S] 20 points 1 year ago Well, the A-50 and the TU-22 M3 mentioned in the article cost around 300-400 million USD each but it's not known yet how many of each type have been damaged and to what extent. Inflicting monetary damage is not as much of a priority compared to crippling Russia's ability to continue their air assaults. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] boreengreen@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) So what is the expected monetary-equivalent loss taken? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] Hubi@feddit.org [S] 20 points 1 year ago Well, the A-50 and the TU-22 M3 mentioned in the article cost around 300-400 million USD each but it's not known yet how many of each type have been damaged and to what extent. Inflicting monetary damage is not as much of a priority compared to crippling Russia's ability to continue their air assaults. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Hubi@feddit.org [S] 20 points 1 year ago Well, the A-50 and the TU-22 M3 mentioned in the article cost around 300-400 million USD each but it's not known yet how many of each type have been damaged and to what extent. Inflicting monetary damage is not as much of a priority compared to crippling Russia's ability to continue their air assaults. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 25 points 1 year ago Literally irreplaceable as Russia can't build these planes anymore. The dollar value is easily in the billions. permalink fedilink source parent