1099
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Definitely has his grip on reality, this one

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

oh no the unbeatable twitter "trust me bro" move. why has no one ever thought about his input??2?

[-] [email protected] 39 points 6 days ago

Fun fact: The faster a car travels, the bigger the spacing between the cars gets. That's necessary to leave enough distance for emergency stops.

While the speed increases linearly, the spacing increases with the square, meaning at double the speed, the spacing quadruples, which in turn means that throughput (number of cars per hour) halves.

This is the reason why many regions use electronic speed signs to drop the speedlimit lower when there's congestion. Because it increases throughput and thus reduces travel times.

The optimum speed for high throughput is 30km/h.

Counterintuitive as it might be, drivers should be all for 30km/h speed limit in cities, because it would make them get to work faster.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago

That's also the fastest speed before sharply increasing the likelihood of fatality in pedestrian collisions

[-] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago

You can cite an infinite amount of proven facts and studies, car brains will never accept your „communist propaganda“. This whole discussion is too emotionally loaded to be based on facts.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] [email protected] 90 points 6 days ago

It's crazy how our 18-lane highway, with none of the stuff mentioned, is gridlocked all the time. 🤔

Maybe one more lane, bro!

[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago

It's the stoplight's fault! Ban stop signs, traffic lights and remove speed limits and we'll never have gridlock again!!!

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago

"Please bro one more line on the highway bro please just one more lane"

[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago

Gee, I wonder what causes congestion in high speed lanes and roads? Too many fucking cars at the same time? Nah, it must be some communist subversion

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 46 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You're right. They don't create congestion.

They ARE congestion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 54 points 6 days ago

My car doesn't create congestion. It's everyone else's that's the problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago

Bikes are not usually allowed on the highway, yet the highway experiences congestion. How is that?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

I once had the pleasure of cycling the Shimanami Kaido in Japan, a bike route that connects the islands of Honshu and Shikoku, hopping between all these minor islands on the way over suspension bridges carrying the main highway.

The bike lane is protected the whole time. In one case, the bike route is actually below the deck of the bridge, and you're on a fenced-in catwalk hundreds of feet over the channel between the islands. Views for miles over Osaka bay.

Honestly, when I look back at my life, it's probably my favorite thing I've ever done. If only the U.S. invested in bike infrastructure like that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 54 points 6 days ago

It amazes me that this country literally has state borders built around rail systems, a huge dependence on rail for shipping, but decided to just pave over trolley rails, and jack prices of train transit to thousands of dollars for just a few hundred miles. Then the government forces us to pay shittons of money into our vehicles in taxes, insurance, etc without regulating the private companies that we're forced to pay. Meanwhile other countries have super fast trains to travel, subsidized with tax money, and travel seems to be more efficient.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago

travel seems to be more efficient.

And they just ignore the negative health outcomes here vs countries where cars are not the norm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 6 days ago

What it wrong with that guy? Did a bike fuck his wife or something?

[-] [email protected] 55 points 6 days ago
[-] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago
[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

The people sieze the means of commuting, and install bike lanes and public transport.

[-] [email protected] 52 points 6 days ago

Communism is when you don't like cars. Apparently.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 38 points 6 days ago

A MAGA-before-there-was-MAGA family member of mine actually used to say "If we didn't have these big slow buses on the streets, and commuter trains blocking the rail crossings, we wouldn't have a traffic problem."

[-] [email protected] 28 points 6 days ago

Reminds me of a quote "Every single drop of water felt it could not be to blame for causing the tidal wave/flood" Me remembering it is a little rough, but the concept stays the same lol.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 34 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The Soviet Union is long gone. Communist should no longer be a derisive and should sound like a 20th century cliché in 2025.

I wonder (can't confirm) if the evergreen state of communist or socialist as derision is due to the far right propaganda industrial complex still pushing (hard) that anything that isn't capitalism is a moral wrong.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

you expect people that are emotionally stuck in the 1950s to recognize the USSR is gone?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'd say he's right. In a way. Cars don't create congestion, they are congestion.

Fine. And with this realisation let's end the phrase "I'm stuck in traffic". Cars aren't stuck in traffic, they are traffic.

Every bike on the road is one less car.

Other than that this guy seriously needs to get out into the fresh air and spend sometime around people (if it is a guy, it's overwhelmingly most likely a bot and so a genuinely harmful thing to engage with, get angry about, republish here, or do anything with other than ignore).

Social media is just getting worse, and although there is much to like about defederation, a lot of the content here is not healthy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago

As a cyclist I've noticed a, harshness, recently. In Ontario our premier did a distraction campaign where he villanised bike lanes. Turns out he was talking about a couple of specific ones but all of the sudden, after biking in town for years. People nearly hit me. There is no Lee way any more. I've been swiped by mirrors and pickup trucks try to roll coal on me (pretty sure you little dicks need a diesel and your just fucking up your engines for nothing) because I like a bike ride on a sunny day. Or want to stay in shape. Or need to get to work. It really does feel like "get a haircut and drive an f150!!!" around here and that wasn't always the case.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago

Not Just Bikes made a video on that. https://youtu.be/KgFCQ7jEZxI

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 36 points 6 days ago

Higher speeds do the opposite for congestion than what you'd think. If everyone and their mum wants to drive on the same stretch of highway at 5pm sharp, there's not enough space - at speed.

Obviously, everyone fits when standing still. The amount of asphalt is immense.

Reducing the speed limit from 120kph to 80 will allow 50% more cars to fit on the same stretch of road, thereby reducing stop and go, and not really impacting your average speed; you'd be stopping and going during rush hour, anyway. But now traffic flows, which is safer and easier to follow.

Why? Because - let's assume safe driving - every car has two seconds of safety distance to the car in front. Those two seconds remain two seconds, but that means the distances you need are twice as large with 120kph than with 60kph. Your car length doesn't even really matter, two seconds at 120kph are ~67m. So the road will always transport 1 car every two seconds per lane, no matter the speed.

You can either rage in a congestion, not knowing if farther up someone has caused a crash and completely blocked everything, or drive slower but steadily. The throughput of the road is the same.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

let’s assume safe driving

That's your problem, caring about safety of others smh

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

"No one in New York drove. There was too much traffic." -Phillip J. Fry

[-] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago

It's true, before we started creating cycling facilities there was no such thing as congestion or pollution /s

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

Fix and expand the US public transportation system. Building infrastructure for automobiles is fucking backwards.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

Water falling from clouds doesn’t mean it’s raining.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well he's right. Cars don't create congestion, in the same way that raindrops don't create floods. Cars ARE congestion.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago

Yeah, it's all those cyclists that you're stuck in traffic with when there's a traffic jam.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago

Isaiah is kinda stupid, isn't he?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

"Ants don't *create* ant colonies."

[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

You're not fooling anyone, Communist.

Congrats on winning the argument, anyone who gets told this. If their entire argument is "you're a commu-social-marxist" then they have no argument and they're delusionally living in the McCarthy age.

Who the fuck do you think you're talking to like this?

LMAO am I supposed to know who this guy is? Because this sounds like an "I'm so important you should have more respect and by respect I mean do what I say" but it could be a "you aren't fooling anyone" I suppose.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

"Communist"

I'm 14 and this is deep.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
1099 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

11937 readers
670 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS