297
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 86 points 1 week ago

Someone really needs to explain the fundamental limitations of shared medium internet connections (pretty much anything wireless) when compared to exclusive medium internet connections (one wire/fiber per end point) to politicians and other decision makers. Banning the advertising of shared medium speeds as if they were exclusively reserved for you would be a good start.

[-] [email protected] 70 points 1 week ago

Oh, I see.

You think this is a "politicians don't understand the tech they're supposed to regulate" issue, and not a "Elon Musk is bribing every greedy asshole in Congress to prop up his businesses at taxpayer expense" issue.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I think one of the issues with taking bribes is that even corrupt people don't want to completely ruin the economy because you don't want the people trying to bribe you lack the money to do so. Or in other words, even apart from any moral issues you don't want to kill your golden goose.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

They can ruin the economy all they want. The people who are bribing them aren't going to run out of money.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe not the top 5 out of those people but the rest certainly will.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

They won't. Not even the top 100. Politicians are relatively cheap to buy.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

What does it matter, the rest didn't bribe them anyway...

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

you underestimate how shortsighted republicans are

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Uhhh – the politicians politicized money to companies to make tubes that we never got. Not sure if elaborating on details of tubes is going to help clear things up.

[-] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They were never building that, let's be honest.

Edit: rural broadband is like the new affordable housing, high speed rail, or better public transit... It's something that's completely possible to do but they'll always find some excuse to do nothing so they can campaign on it again next cycle

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago

Every single time the land line ISPs have gotten money for rural broadband, they use it for something else and don't build anything. Starlink actually built a network that works. Many places have gotten decent 5G home internet too.

I have been promised fiber for over a decade yet the only wired connection available is a DSL network that's been so poorly maintained that it barely even functions.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago

Do you mean works or falls out of the sky routinely to litter the earth? We build lots as far as smaller ISPs go. You just don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Starlink is designed to demise on re-entry. It's a core criteria.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, who needs fiber when you have an inferior product that will be worse in every calculable way?

Pay no attention to the person who stands to benefit from this deal. There’s definitely nothing illegal about it.

So what if the owner of Starlink just happened to spend a quarter of a billion dollars to get the current president elected? That surely has nothing to do with the abysmal Starlink service stealing away funding for critical infrastructure.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

But just think how blazing fast the speeds will be! When they're hurtling out of orbit and crashing into your house!

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Starlink demises on re-entry.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Why would they fall out of orbit?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Hope you like satellite internet.

Not as much as I revile Musk.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

This would be REALLY CORRUPT if the CEO of Starlink was ALSO cutting HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of American Jobs and SLASHING BILLIONS in Social Funding (like Social Security) just so we could Give Him these CONTRACTS! But FOX NEWS told me that was NOT true so it's OK!

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

The plan’s lead architect, Evan Feinman, says that before he was forced out by the Trump administration in March, [...] In March, Lutnick announced a “rigorous review” of BEAD, which he claims is too “woke” and filled with “burdensome regulations.” Now the plan may change.

Hatred really does make you do stupid things.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
297 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

70847 readers
3172 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS