51
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
(page 2) 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

For a given value of recent, it's between three things.

Black garlic, vegemite and marmite.

Black garlic is candy with depth. Sweet, savory, and a mild pungency that nothing else has. It's also a great ingredient, but stands as its own delightful edible.

Vegemite is basically a salt and umami bomb. It's best used as a spread, imo, but can be added to soups, stews, or other dishes that can use a little boost with only the smallest of additions.

Marmite is similar to vegemite, but has a bit more versatility, imo. It's also more of a syrupy consistency compared to the paste of vegemite. The flavor profile is different though, with marmite having a malty undertone and being slightly earthier. But it can generally be added to marinades and sauces in a way that vegemite isn't as good at.

The key with the 'mites is moderation. As ingredients, you might add at most a whole teaspoon to a pot of soup. And that's going to be a heavy addition. As a spread, you want the thinnest possible layer on the bread because both are salty and potent. But, you can layer on a little of either, with some butter, on toast and it is amazing, just like that.

Black garlic, I have trouble using as an ingredient because it's just so damn good by itself. But it can go anywhere garlic goes. Either by itself, or with normal garlic. But I prefer it along the lines of how people use truffles, and typically on dishes where it's going to have plenty of room to come though. It's expensive enough compared to regular garlic that you don't want to waste it in a giant pot of marinara where it'll get drowned out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Garlic (and other veggie) confit, using said confit as an ingredient in homemeade tapenade.
Also made a Bordelaise for the first time ever. I love learning new foods.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Not a single food, but I discovered sushi tastes good with ranch dressing.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Kelp snacks are pretty nice. It's the combination of having this wet chewy texture with savory flavours that really does it for me. Great to munch on in the summer.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
51 points (96.4% liked)

Casual Conversation

3363 readers
353 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS