AI Slop
this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
0 points (50.0% liked)
Technology
70080 readers
3060 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It’s this whole account too
Are we missing some zeros here? So one to a few hours of testing, that is it? So I assume the sensors simply failed completely after that, why else would they not test it longer or withhold the results? Quote:
Researchers tested them at different bending speeds:
838.9 mV at 100 bends/hour 856.7 mV at 200 bends/hour 852.6 mV at 400 bends/hour
Even after hundreds of cycles, the signal stayed strong, proving these sensors can handle repetitive movement without breaking down.
This kind of reliability is huge for prosthetic limbs, fitness trackers, and robotic arms, where precision and durability are non-negotiable.
This kind of reliability is huge for prosthetic limbs, fitness trackers, and robotic arms, where precision and durability are non-negotiable.
Thanks, AI slop! Sensors that have been durability tested for a few hundred cycles will be perfect for prosthetic devices that can do that in half a day of office work, or fitness trackers that can do that in five minutes, or in robotic arms that can perform that kind of movement in 60 seconds! I'm going to use them in my next safety critical robotics project for sure!