this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
328 points (89.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12157 readers
1160 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago

Land Value Tax would solve this.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 23 hours ago (11 children)

The homeowners have two options, and both options suck.

  • sell
  • don't sell

Both alternatives carry costs. But they own a home worth 4.4mil and have to pay 2% of that each year. That's pretty low.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 276 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (32 children)

Yeah some serious boomer logic going on here.

"We thought that if we kept the foundation and the outer walls of the house and we just took the roof off, it was our understanding that we were going to preserve our Save Our Homes and our homestead,” says Debbie."

"the renovations—removing the roof, adding a second floor —ultimately triggered a full reassessment of the home’s value. Under Florida law, once a property is deemed substantially improved, it can be treated as new construction, removing the protections that had capped the home’s assessed value for years."

[–] [email protected] 238 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Boomer logic ..... "I want all the benefits, entitlements and supports of society and none of the responsibilities."

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Can you imagine the pain of having to pay fairly for what you own... Disgusting.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago

“We do have the law to comply with,” Schwartzreich says. “It really puts us in the middle.”

🤣🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 169 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They basically rebuilt their home and are sad it's appraised at market value.

That's at least what I got from it.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, not a lot of sympathy from me.

4.4 mil, wow.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

If it’s that big of a problem for their life, why not just sell the house and be multi-millionaires? It’s a non-story. Maybe they should’ve taken that into consideration.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 day ago

Rich boomers who haven't worked in 30 years want to keep property values high without paying the property tax to go with it

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 day ago (6 children)

How were they supposed to know real estate law being… checks notes…

a real estate attorney?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hahahahahahaha

Oh no, their taxes went up with the value of their property

🎻

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's always funny when looking at the tax-system in the US from an EU perspective. Americans looking at any receipt they get in an EU country and immediately pointing out the huge VAT tariff.

Then one only needs to point to the property tax in the US.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Sales taxes are regressive. People who spend more money on services and less on goods are typically wealthier. Sales taxes hit the poor the hardest. Whereas the property tax on a multi unit building is typically a better rate for each family than a single family home.

If you read the article these people tried to abuse a loophole that had kept their propery taxes capped for years and they failed miserably. They tried to keep just enough of the home to avoid the value of the home being reassessed for taxes. But they added an entire second story and that triggered the reassessment. Essentially they thought they could cheat and build more home than they could afford to pay for.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

basically what happens when you create and support a housing system whose goal is to make profit. doesnt matter if you yourself plan on living in it, people voted for the system that approved the nonsense of longterm profiteering of a basic need.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›