all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 94 points 2 years ago (26 children)

It's nice there's a front end for all these tools but I kinda don't get why is everything "hosted". This could have just been a desktop app. I guess it can be useful when you want to convert something on your phone but to me it just seems like unnecessary server maintenance burden.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It’s nice because I don’t have to install it. Now I can use it when I work, on my computer at home or when my dad calls me.

    But there is also merit to using a desktop application.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Fair enough. I guess I imagined someone hosting all the selfhosted web apps that get posted to this forum, when most people likely just host only the few they need on the go, so it isn't really that burdensome.

    Edit: Forgot to add: I always though that it could be useful to just set up Apache Guacamole, so that instead of the hosted services, my family members could just use remote desktop apps but I never got around to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    My small repurposed NAS could not handle hosting everything posted here, but it would be really nice if I had the time to both set it up AND use them. I'm suprised it can even handle almost 10 apps (but I am the only user).

    I also had a dream of setting up Guacamole and run Heroes of Might and Magic III turn based. But I never got it working (didn't use docker back then) so I gave up on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think that a good chunk of the selfhosted community is "sole IT guy at a tiny company". This is great for that, since having to update desktop software in twenty places sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (13 children)

    Different use cases.

    It's not like your uploading and downloading gigabytes to it to use ffmpeg. For that you use something local. This is for converting smaller files conveniently. For example from a laptop and you don't want to use a public converter that might keep the content.

    If you regularly convert certain file types on a computer, dedicated programs tend to be better than these combo ones anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Why would anyone setup and maintain a server to do infrequent conversions of small files?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Because otherwise you need to maintain it on everyone of your computers and phone and everytime you wipe them and in every virtual machine you make and the developpers would need to maintain a version for every operating system that exists and they always forget to make a version for BeOS so that sucks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I'm genuinely confused about the use cases you all seem to have. When are you sitting in a field on your phone trying desperately to convert a .avi to a .mkv?

    For desktops you just need to have ffmpeg or handbrake or ImageMagick installed - there's nothing to "maintain". Image conversion is as simple as convert test.jpg test.png.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I’m genuinely confused about the use cases you all seem to have. When are you sitting in a field on your phone trying desperately to convert a .avi to a .mkv?

    I worked IT for a newspaper back when they were more relevant. The satelite offices and in-field work had a surprising amount of problems like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    Just try to explain how to install ffmpeg to grandma

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    First - I'd like you to reconsider you use of "grandma" as a stand-in for "somebody who is technically illiterate". Maybe ask yourself why "grandpa" is not the go-to here and whether you may be perpetuating an ugly stereotype.

    Second - I actually included handbrake in my list as an easier alternative to use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    The ugly stereotype will end when my grandma installs linux on my pc.

    I understand you make a point about gender but people from the 50s didn't let women install linux or drive. That's not to say they can't or shouldn't just that they largely don't to the point they convey the image to immediately give the tech bros an imagine of a user which they cannot fault or shame for not following their excessively convoluted processes which importune everyone. And handbrake isn't much better, for instance tgeir recent refusal to add actually useful presets that user need instead saying "users can just make their own profile if they really want to"

    https://github.com/HandBrake/HandBrake/issues/6796

    https://github.com/HandBrake/HandBrake/issues/6797

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    In addition to the other post...

    You already have a setup and throwing one more docker on isn't a big deal. especially if you have watchtower already setup as well... then it even updates itself.

    I use tools like this all the time... PDF for example stirling-pdf makes doing something things a LOT easier than firing up a "proper" pdf editor. This tool would likely be the same concept for other workflows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I love Stirling PDF. I use it probably once a quarter on average. But it's always there, ready to be useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    As do I.. had a coworker message me about using adobe to merge/split pdfs... rather than walking them through the adobe workflow, just linked them right to the url... It's so easy to use that I didn't have to say anything more. they got it in seconds that would have taken me minutes of back and forth to explain to them.

    It's great. Simple tools for simple purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Why not both?

    I use this on desktop https://github.com/Tichau/FileConverter but then on mobile how you would convert files, especially niche technical ones? I used to rely on cloudconvert.com but now I can install this on my server

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Install it once, use it on any of your devices. Run it once on a capable server so even potatoes get the advantage of it. Run it once so it only needs to support one OS and hardware architecture.

    Using an app of some description over many different device types is far more of a maintenance headache and that's before you start dealing with app stores.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is a great addition to my home-lab, no more "free online convert" tools needed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    If I had a nickel for every time someone has whined that you need to self host this, I’d have 2 nickels. Which isn’t a lot but still noteworthy because this is literally a self-host community.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    But I want to trust randos with my file conversions! 😡

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I think the point is that it could be a desktop app

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    Then use a desktop app instead, this is absolutely useful for me to host on my homelab, I can convert from any web connected device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Wow, it even includes plenty of 3d file types which are quite hard to actually find converters for.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    This is awesome, thank you for sharing.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Nice but I believe it lacks the ability to chose the codec, bitrate, etc for videos (and bitrate for audio?)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    We need a running service when a simple command will do?

    How big an attack surface do you need?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    And your simple command that covers all the file types supported, on any platform, is... What?

    If you're gonna bitch, and say your alternative is better, you had better cough up the alternative or your just full of shit...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    github says options for converters are still missing? i'd love to see shared settings for converters; like what do you in ffmpeg for best videoquality on mobile, what setting to create best avif or image compressions like tinypng.

  • source
  • [+] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)