this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
645 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22983 readers
3698 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Van Hollen and Booker showing how representatives in government should be working for their constituents. I hope their aim is to be as annoying as possible until something good comes of it, but I worry Bukele will just arrest them and further erode the numbers we have in Congress.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Why not all of them? Weren't they all wrongfully deported?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Meanwhile, in Germany 1934

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

Bukele will crack by the 18th hour of filibustering.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

He's gonna get assassinated

[–] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago

The bottom line is that man will never be safe in this country again. This fascist regime has made sure of that. He will have a massive target on his back if he ever returns.

American fascism is here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Lets not conflate Van hollen and Booker.
Van Hollen actually does good with his position and I dont see skeletons in his closet.

Booker is a centrist zionist bullshitter trying to ride van hollens coattails. Booker has done some good things, but when the chips are down and his vote is needed, he doesnt show up. A DNC democrat that needs to be removed along with the rest of the so called "liberals". Lets make these people wear their voting history and not adore them for their purely performative BS or empty words.

Tired of empty cult of personality democrats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Hard agree. Underrated comment.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well Booker is doing a hell of a lot more than most other reps when it comes to this, no need to shit on the dude.

Like, I'd take him over the GOP candidate that ran against him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

so would I, but why is our yardstick always "is he better than a republican". Thats exactly how we lose campaigns.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's not but party unity is also important and we won't find perfection. Working within the confines of our real world is important but I agree that we need better representatives. Booker is just what our system gave us and he's a lot better than many alternatives and worse than others.

Mostly I think having a unified message and party is important but hard when you're dealing with people who actually care.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Most would agree he sounds better and seems to do better somewhat, but it is still hard to trust him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Donald and his many goons has many skeletons in his cabinet. The only difference is, he’s showing it in real time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

He's definitely gonna run for president again and is trying to position himself as relevant. He'll never win.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

"You won't have to vote ever again"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

The Legislative and Judicial branches need their own armed forces in order to help provide a real counter to unconstitutional executive overreach.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If I were that man I would not want to return to the US. Send him somewhere safe.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

His wife and child are American citizens. His life, job and friends are in the US.

It's not easy for people to give up the people and places they love.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Where would he go? If he doesn't have family anywhere else, how do you uproot your life and start 100% fresh elsewhere?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

This is giving Jonestown

[–] [email protected] 171 points 1 day ago (6 children)

All of them were wrongly deported.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Trafficked*

Deportation, by definition, includes due process

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›