all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 150 points 2 years ago (9 children)

did LinkedIn merge with Twitter overnight?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 130 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What an eloquent yet brutal statement, I love it!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 136 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Clown on JS all you like, but if git was perfect within a week of creation, why does it receive updates? 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Those were all written prior to release as a way to ensure git could grow and evolve with its userbase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Sorry, the sarcasm didn't come through. My joke was that no software is perfect because software is constantly evolving as people's needs and desires change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sorry, the sarcasm didn't come through. My joke was that no software is perfect because software is constantly evolving as people's needs and desires change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The post isn't claiming perfection. It's claiming production ready. Very different things.

    The confusion there is the claim that good/perfect means done. It means ready for use and extensible.

    Note: I'm not agreeing/disagreeing with the claim. Just clarifying the point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 109 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Only git wasn’t done in 10 days. It was very quickly able to track its own development, but it still took Linus half a year of thinking to be able to make git.

    (No, sorry, I can’t find the interview that would validate that claim.)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not to mention years of using BitKeeper and knowing exactly what he wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    And it sounds like somebody on the kernel team reverse engineered the internals of bit keeper so they would have a clear understanding of precisely how it worked - but more importantly the ways that it didn't suit their workflow

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago*

    And it would still benefit for taking a week to formally define its interface before Linus started coding.

    Also, basic is famous for being already fully specified and mostly stolen from other people's work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I don't understand where the author got the idea that git was production ready in 10 days... Let's look at git history:

    • Official development started on 03.04.2005.
    • Git could self host on 07.04.2005.
    • Git achieved Torvald's performance goals on 29.04.2005.
    • On 16.06.2005 git was used to release the Linux kernel for the first time. That can be considered the first beta release, which achieved its goals, but wasn't production ready yet.
    • Production ready v1.0 was released on 21.12.2005. That's waaaaaaaay longer than 10 days.

    No good software is released in 10 days.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Of course it's nonsense and bullshit, but managers who don't understand software development (and don't want to, they literally don't give a shit) parrot this bullshit line and others over and over to push for faster development.

    I was lucky enough to be left to my decides for a while and I've build an extremely dependable phoundation on which I'm now building various products and the company now is starting to churn out great dependable products because of it. The old guard still hasn't been able to move forward in 2 years because they're only busy with puttibg out fires everywhere all day every day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Altair Basic was released in 1978 for hardware that sold around 25,000 units..

    I'm sure glad computing remained exactly equally complex since then, with exactly the same number of users, and same minimal diversity of use cases. (This is sarcasm.)

    Everything should still take 10 days. Anyone who tells me it takes longer probably believes all that crap about the Internet being more than a passing fad. (Still sarcasm.)

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    There are several shell scripts that I've written in even less than ten days!

  • source
  • [+] 14 points 2 years ago
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    It walks, sounds, smells and looks like a bullshit. I wonder what could it be?

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    what do you have against js?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments