cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5566633

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/todayilearned by /u/MechCADdie on 2025-04-04 08:19:11+00:00.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 142 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [+] 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    People are going to say it shouldn't be her for all the same reasons they said Obama couldn't win...

    AOC is popular enough to get the votes, and she'll actually fight while in office.

    I really hope she runs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    They are already trying to setup Kamala for 2028. I have zero faith that the Democrats are going to learn anything from their failure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 113 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Someone has either never seen “Ferris Buller’s Day Off,” can’t remember it very well, or didn’t pay attention. This was covered in class!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 95 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the... Anyone? Anyone?... the Great Depression, passed the... Anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act? Which, anyone? Raised or lowered?... raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression. Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the revenue curve, you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. Voodoo economics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I watched this movie 3-4 times and even when reading this, I'm still spaced out.

    Ben Stein just has a voice that makes me tune him out.

    Such a great voice for comedy. Shame he's anti-abortion, pretty racist, pro-Regan and Trump, weirdly against evolution... So many awful perspectives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (18 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 70 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Proof yet again that "business leaders" typically don't know shit about shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 66 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    There is some nuance here. Smoot-Hawley didn't cause the great depression, and there a lot of economists who say it didn't have that much of an effect at all.

    Tarriffs can have some useful effects when used for protectionism, diplomatic coercion, or trade barrier reduction coercion. However, Trump's tariffs are way dumber than anything that came before, because he's trying to do all three of these at once. All of these have conflicting effects on each other, and it is literally impossible to design a tariff strategy that can accomplish all three, since raising a tariff for one purpose means that you need to lower tariffs for other purposes. All he's doing by raising across the board is causing instability in the economy and convincing all partners to ditch the US.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    Fun fact! - this is what Ben Stein is teaching in Ferris Bueller's day off.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 56 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The largest Senate loss in history yet

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Every day of my life is an economic crisis.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Is this implying if you with paycheck to paycheck it doesn't affect you? People playing with the stock market can afford to lose. This isn't going to hurt them nearly as much as those who can't afford to lose

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No, it’s not saying people living paycheck-to-paycheck won’t be affected. I think the point is - scary threat isn’t scary, because such people already feel the constant threat of poverty every day. Being regularly pumped full of cortisol over worries of simply surviving, there are no fucks left to give when additional threats are piled on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 55 points 1 year ago

    The thing about Smoot-Hawley is that when it happened everyone else also put up equal tariffs among one another.

    this time the EU, Japan, South Korea, Canada are only putting tariffs on the US. Not amongst themselves.

  • source
  • [+] 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (38 children)
    load more comments (38 replies)
    [–] 50 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Great depression, and 2/3rds drop in global trade resulted.

    I present also 1828 dementia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_of_Abominations which started southern secessionist movements.

    Unjustifiable trade attacks like all wars are bad for unity. If California or Texas has to pay $10k more per car so metal and auto workers elsewhere get high pay, national unity fractures. Everything being super expensive with no jobs because of global trade retaliations, means that Mexicans stop being a unifying problem, and those white Michigan and Pennsylvania blue collar workers cheering for Trump are the problem. Better cars elsewhere in the world become a bigger national unity factor the more protection $ is spent on inferior cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 1 year ago

    Well they had elections afterwards. Trump's nazis will just throw dissenters into KZs and invade their neighbours.

    There will be no free elections anymore

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 35 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Smoot-Hawley 2: Electric Boogaloo

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Tarrifs are billionaire cash grabs, nothing more. Nobody likes those. Except billionaires of course.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Even the billionaires are going to lose money. It's just unjustifiably stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They have enough money to coast along to buy and hoard failing companies and collect them for whenever the economy rebounds.

    Billionaires have so much money, they could spend a few thousand a day and it wouldn't hurt their bank account for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago*

    They could spend $100,000 a day for 50 years an not have spent through 2 Billion. Elon and musk both command 200 Billion ish. the interest alone is worth that 8 billion a year if it was in treasuries.

    Every year the interest on Musks fortune could generate enough money to spend $2,100,000 a day without even losing a dollar of principle. on the theoretical interest of his fortune.

    I lost 10% of my retirement today. Thats not even a fraction of any of these numbers 😂😭

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They also didn't have fox news at that time :/

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago*

    They had newspapers owned by William Randolph Hearst, who pretty much invented the "yellow press". And whose story is eerily similar to Musk's, including a sudden swing from progressivism to far right nationalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    If we don't get these paid actors out of Congress we're going to lose in ways most people really don't want to believe

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    A hero of the right, Ronald Reagan, actually gave a speech condemning tariffs. Yup, I'm actually on Reagan's side here.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Mj6N-WBPrVw

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I think there's room for reasonable tariff policy, but unfortunately the US is a nuance-free land full of extremists so Trump's terrible implementation will make tariffs radioactive for another generation if there's a large public backlash.

    It doesn't need to be absolutely free trade with slavers or tariff man hell. We could raise the standard of living by allowing free trade but imposing tariffs -- or even outright bans on imports -- from places legalizing slave labor and other close to slave labor conditions. But obviously none of that fits into Trump's dumbass worldview.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just throwing this out there.

    If you expect conservatives to learn anything from this experience, I can promise you on my life that they won't. They will not deviate from voting R under any circumstance in existence.

    Best we can hope for is independents getting a clue and helping swing the next election, if there is one, back to the grownup party.

    Not holding my breath though. This is a very, very stupid generation of Americans.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    God let history repeating itself be a good thing for once.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›