all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 177 points 1 year ago (4 children)

People keep saying his approval rating this and that.

I honestly don't think Nazis give a shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Disapproval is a temporary condition, anyway. Soon enough, it'll be illegal (or at least dangerous) to express disapproval, and Trump's numbers will be right up there with Putin and Kim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    it’ll be illegal (or at least dangerous) to express disapproval, and Trump’s numbers will be right up there with Putin and Kim.

    I don't see the problem as MAGA Republicans suddenly becoming popular on the "it's illegal not to like us" gambit. Bush Jr tried this in his second term - purging the White House press corps, leaning hard on conservative media for support, even prosecuting hostile journalists - and all he got out of it was Wikileaks and a robust anti-Bush media underground.

    What we have to worry about is the Race To The Bottom

    Trump doesn't have to be the most popular politician. He just has to be more popular than the opposition. And that's become downright trivial, given how the geriatric Dem Leadership has prostrated themselves before him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're largely spot on, but one thing I'd like to add is that Republicans in Walz's state have actually pushed forward a "Trump Derangement Syndrome" bill, which would classify openly speaking negatively about Trump as a mental illness that is valid justification for incarceration in a mental health facility, which is exactly what Russia did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Republicans in Walz’s state have actually pushed forward a “Trump Derangement Syndrome” bill

    Which won't pass their state house, certainly won't pass their state senate, and Walz isn't going to sign.

    which is exactly what Russia did

    The post-Soviet Russian state was the result of shock therapy more consistent with Musk's DOGE strategy than any kind of middling public censorship campaign. Rapid privatization of state assets for the benefit of sellout state actors and foreign investors/liquidators was what brought down the Russian government.

    Putin's United Russia didn't come to power through petty proletariat censorship. It came to power when Putin and his allies mobilized what was left of the police state and used it to whip the newly minted billionaire oligarchy into an ideologically consistent nationalist project. We saw a similar transformation in China, in the immediate run up to the Xi Premiership. Both Xi and Putin had to wrestle power away from western-friendly kleptocrats intent on turning their states into the next Philippines or Honduras.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Slotkin? Really? This woman is pretty despised among left leaning Michigan Dems. Complete turn coat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    She's got name recognition purely from the SotU rebuttal at the moment. I doubt she'd poll better than Schumer if she was allowed in front of a camera for too long.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    https://www.mlive.com/news/2025/03/sen-elissa-slotkin-says-her-job-is-to-be-more-than-just-an-activist-against-trump.html

    This was the article that made me lose faith in her.

    Slotkin responded by saying she also serves Michigan residents who voted for Trump and that she is responding to the needs of residents who are impacted by changes at the federal level and executive orders from Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 154 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "You need to verify your SSN identity in person... At an SSN office which has been defunded and has no employees..."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 107 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Also, the nearest office is three states over.

    So, some good news, when you are forced into an involuntary road trip to get your daughter or granddaughter an abortion you can use verifying your identity to social security as a cover to avoid being deported to El Salvador.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Trump no longer needs any voter approval.

    There will be no more elections, or the elections will be falsified Russia-style.

    It’s game over in the US. The US is in the late stages of capitalism, falling like the Roman Empire.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    All my life, I've watched the US slide. But it's crazy it's falling apart right now. Seems surreal for some reason.

    I care about Americans and America. There are many good people, who care about me, and us. They deserve to thrive in a secure, prosperous country. I don't want to discount a nation just because of the idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Thank you. We’re all scared and angry here and it’s hard to know what to do that won’t get us deported to El Salvador supermax some day in the future thus letting our kids down

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    There will be no more elections, or the elections will be falsified Russia-style.

    We're going to test this hypothesis soon enough. Two big gubernatorial races in Virginia and Pennsylvania this year. The "voting no longer matters" crowd is going to assert that these will be landslides for heavy MAGA conservatives, I'm presuming?

    We've also got five out-of-cycle vacancy elections for House seats happening, two of which are scheduled for April 1st. FL-1 already had a primary for the GOP position, while the Dem candidate ran uncontested. FL-6 had primaries for both R and D candidates. Have these elections already been rigged? Is the outcome predetermined?

    It’s game over in the US.

    You wouldn't be the first one to make this claim.

    The End of History and the Last Man is a 1992 book of political philosophy by American political scientist Francis Fukuyama which argues that with the ascendancy of Western liberal democracy—which occurred after the Cold War (1945–1991) and the dissolution of the Soviet Union (1991)—humanity has reached "not just ... the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such: That is, the end-point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government."

    ...

    In 2014, on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the publication of the original essay, "The End of History?", Fukuyama wrote a column in The Wall Street Journal again updating his hypothesis. He wrote that, while liberal democracy still had no real competition from more authoritarian systems of government "in the realm of ideas", nevertheless he was less idealistic than he had been "during the heady days of 1989". Fukuyama noted the Orange Revolution in Ukraine and the Arab Spring, both of which seemed to have failed in their pro-democracy goals, as well as the "backsliding" of democracy in countries including Thailand, Turkey and Nicaragua. He stated that the biggest problem for the democratically elected governments in some countries was not ideological but "their failure to provide the substance of what people want from government: personal security, shared economic growth and the basic public services ... that are needed to achieve individual opportunity." Though he believed that economic growth, improved government and civic institutions all reinforced one another, he wrote that it was not inevitable that "all countries will ... get on that escalator"

    But it's not a game and it's never over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The “voting no longer matters” crowd is going to assert that these will be landslides for heavy MAGA conservatives, I’m presuming?

    Or votes being thrown out due to "fraud" or the election being cancelled or certain voters being rounded up by cops so they can't cast ballots or any other number of ways elections can be meddled with.

    And don't be too triumphalist just because the election goes off without any problems and Democrats win, this isn't really The Big One. The House and Senate races in 2026 will tell us what the future of elections will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Or votes being thrown out due to “fraud”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Eye_(United_States)

    or the election being cancelled

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks_Brothers_riot

    or certain voters being rounded up by cops so they can’t cast ballots

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/texas-woman-sentenced-five-years-trying-vote-gets-new-appeal-n1262691

    https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/11/politics/hervis-rogers-texas-voting-charge/index.html

    or any other number of ways elections can be meddled with.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_caging

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_suppression_in_the_United_States#False_information

    All common in US politics and heavily influential in shaping the outcomes of states like Ohio, Texas, and Florida. These are features baked into our election system and designed to shape the outcomes. They've been going on since the colonial era. This is not a bug of liberal democracy but a feature. To pretend Trump is changing the game, you need to ignore how its historically been played.

    And don’t be too triumphalist just because the election goes off without any problems and Democrats win

    Of course not. What could that possibly prove, except Democrats aren't nearly as far removed from the Project 2025 goon squad as they like to advertise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    To pretend Trump is changing the game, you need to ignore how its historically been played.

    Right, he's just reviving older parts of the playbook. Very few of the things he's done are actually new, they're just things the US isn't used to anymore or things that haven't been done on a massive scale.

    But it wasn't voting that made those older practices fall out of favor, it was more direct actions: labor militancy, mass protests, and radical organizing. What your examples demonstrate is that Trump is defeatable even if he revives every authoritarian trick in the US playbook, but none of that proves voting specifically still matters.

    I'll be watching the 2026 elections to see if we can still vote our way out of this, or if we simply need to do something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Trump may not care about approval ratings, but representatives and senators care about keeping their seats more than anything else.

    If baby boomers reject republican candidates, they’ll turn against Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    You sweet summer child.

    Trump openly stated that Elon knows how to use voting machines to their benefit.

    Trump openly stated that we won’t need to have elections any longer.

    Your vote no longer matters. Oversight about voting has been dismantled.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 88 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Boomers waiting until something affects them directly before making the right decision? I'm sure no one saw that coming.

    I appreciate that the whole generation isn't that way, but at the same time, the number of Boomers I have personally interacted with who have absolutely no understanding that they are not the main character is way too damn high. A little empathy would go a long way, especially when many of them in the Boomer voting bloc are too old to ever see the effects of their vote.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Seniors don't have [at least some threat of physical violence].

    Share that sentiment at your local VFW or AMVETS, and you will learn that propensity is not a prerequisite for proficiency. In fact, those who are most familiar with and capable of violence are usually the same who are most reluctant to employ it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    "senior" is a pretty wide range though. You can be old enough to get a senior's discount and still able enough to do most things. Maybe you aren't going to be doing 100 situps after jogging 10 miles, but march the streets and hold a rifle sure, and there's probably a good mix of ex-military in there as well as people who know how to make stuff go kaboom in unique and interesting ways.

    Taking away their reasons to sit contently and die quietly might not work out as well as some think, but this party in particular is pretty good at thinking everyone but themselves are inept.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    It’s echo chamber headline bait. Any “people think such and such” headline is just there to tell you what you want to hear. There’s no action here. Nothing useful. Just bricks in the echo chamber wall.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Every time I see a headline saying trump's approval rating has plummeted, I look and it's always in the mid to upper 40's. Every time. It never changes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    All these articles are pure hopeium. I check his approval rating daily hoping my country will gain some sense. His approval is higher than his first term. Half the population has has their brains turned to scrambled eggs by social media. And I get the irony of saying this on social media.

    People are impressionable and the tech bros who control movement of information have fallen in line behind Trump. It's going to be a bumpy ride y'all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    In related news, Trump's approval ratings remain unchanged among Nazis.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    The survey conducted between March 9 and March 11 found that 49 percent of people over 65 approved of Trump's performance as president, while 48 percent disapproved, giving him a net approval rating of +1.

    The same survey conducted between March 16 and March 18 found his net approval rating had dropped by 10 points to -9. In that survey, only 45 percent of people over 65 approved of the job Trump was doing, while 54 percent disapproved.

    45% still approve. Isn't that higher than his lowest point last time?

    It doesn't matter anyway, he does not need to be popular to do whatever he wants

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Rating dropped from +1 (49% approval, 48% disapproval) from 3/9 to 3/11, to -9 (45% approval, 54% disapproval) from 3/16 to 3/18. Sample sizes 400 and 384 respectively. “Boomer” = 65+

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Did they die?

  • source