top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 2 years ago (6 children)

This blew my mind. All those movies!

So, Back to the Future's a bunch of bullshit?!

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's possible to assume that the professor did the math.

    But yeah any time machine would also basically have to have space travel built in to compensate.

    They knew that when they wrote Dr Who (IE the time travel machine is called a TARDIS (Time and Relative Dimension in Space).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    There's a ton of issues with time travel. That could be one, but most fictional time-travel devices can be said to accommodate for the difference in distance. It would just be boring to explain on-screen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    That's why doctor who works, its very clear about the fact that TARDIS travels in spacetime, it can do only time, only space or both space and time and they can get away with time traveling and still staying on earth

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It could be explained as a time and space machine but just saying time machine is easier.

    That's how ive always thought of these things in my head.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    incorrect, that is not what this means. They could have forgotten about the position setting all together. Also why the suns position? it is also moving and non absolute, just like earths. Makes no difference in this meme

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I know we're in a meme community but this did get me thinking... Not only is the Earth spinning but it's also in an orbit around the Sun which is also orbiting around the center of the Milky Way which is moving through space relative to other galaxies and so on.

    Do we have enough information to calculate a position in space in the future for Earth without a fixed reference other than current point?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

    That's what einstein said. There is no fixed reference frame, but only relative ones. Every "inertial"(meaning, motion without any external force) frame of reference is equally valid as any other inertial frame movibg with respect to it.

    But for sure we can tell earth's orbit is not inertial since circular motion occur, which is due to external force of gravity.

    Edit:typo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    If space is always expanding, I’d really like to know if a time traveler would experience issues existing in a universe where the space between atoms is different from the one they left.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    that's why you build it like a spaceship 🤷 ez

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    I remember reading about this concept as a kid in a short story Neal Shusterman wrote called Same Time, Next Year. Blew my mind

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I was surprised when I read the OG time machine story by Jules Verne and this was a main plot point, and only later stories hand-waived it. You'd think it was something from later analysis of the idea. Almost like that Verne dude was clever.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    It should be illegal to remind people (me, particularly) about Steins;Gate while they're at work

    I can't be fucking crying on the clock, dawg

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Should have watched Tom Scott

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Heyy this property features in the accidental time machine by Joe Haldeman

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Oooohh. Thanks for the tip, just added that into my time travelling port o pottie's destination algorithms. Gotta respect the earth be moving and shit.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Wow, I never thought about that.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    See, that's a problem they always skip in time-travel movies.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's just another problem with the mechanics of the snap at the end of Avengers: Endgame

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Magic exists in that universe though and they're using some of the most powerful objects in the universe. So like if it's granting a wish, you just wish that everyone comes back to earth or whatever. It's not even really a suspension of disbelief. It feels more silly to think that genius scientists using wish granting artifacts wouldn't remember to account for the movement of the earth through space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Also ghosts likely wouldn't be affected by a gravitational pull, so the concept doesn't make sense and there'd just be a trail of ghosts in space.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You've got to entangle the same machine first over a massive macro quantum space-time superposition.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›