They tried (programming.dev)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
 

EDIT: I didn't realize the anger this would bring out of people. It was supposed to be a funny meme based on recent real-life situations I've encountered, not an attack on the EU.

I appreciate the effort of the EU cookie laws. The practice of them just doesn't live up to the theory of the law. Shady companies are always going to find a way to be shady.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 327 points 3 years ago* (16 children)
  • [–] 117 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    IIRC the EU also ruled that burying the rejection options under additional links counts as a violation. Hence why Google now has a Reject button next to the accept button. Most sites still do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Do you know if there is a EU-wide place to report such behavior?

    The biggest privately owned TV channel in my country not only does that, but actually just redirects you to a pdf file if you want to "manage cookies". And it's not like I can submit a complaint on a national level, as the ruling party's website uses google analytics without a cookie notice at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    They're still widely used for some (illegal) reason

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Because they rest safe in the knowledge that you rarely if ever get taken to court for it. There are millions of web pages, it needs people to take action to do something about it, and just clicking "Yes all of them" to access the content you were just trying to get to is a far better solution in most situations than hiring a lawyer and investing a few years of legal proceedings, nevermind the money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago

    even worse offenders are the ones with tick boxes for "Legitimate Interest", since legitimate interest is another grounds for processing (just ads freely given consent is one), the fact you got a "tick" box for it makes it NOT legitimate interest within the confines of the GDPR.

    it also doesn't matter what technology you use whether its cookies / urls / images / local storage / spy satellites. its solely about how you use the data..

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 197 points 3 years ago (17 children)

    Any website that does that I just close the tab.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 162 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I refuse to go to sites that do this, I also refuse to go to sites that block adblock...and specially the sites that detect and block private browsing, that one shouldn't even be a thing

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 149 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Cool. One less website to visit. Not like there is a shortage.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 90 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I'm pretty sure breaking your website with no cookies is against the rules, actually. It's either serve the EU with GDPR-compliance or GTFO entirely.

    Yeah, you could still just break the law, but as usual there's a cost to that one way or the other.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago

    this. and honestly I wish more websites followed the "serve under gdpr or don't have a European marker". A random blog once wasn't available in the EU because of GDPR. And you know what? It's better than them violating GDPR and the EU doing nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 75 points 3 years ago

    Your meme is funny, but people genuinely use these arguments to be against sensible EU laws, hence the response I imagine.

  • source
  • [–] 61 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Yeah being unable to open… checks notes local news websites from the US has been a real deal breaker

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 54 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    That's gotta be quite some website you visited, if it didn't load at all without cookies. As someone from Germany, who mostly rejects every sites cookies, except for the essential ones most of the time, but sometimes outright rejects all cookies, I've never encountered a website that refused to load upon doing that.

    Not defending any webpages that do do that, just contributing my personal experience.

    Also: this for chrome or this for fiefrerfx

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 51 points 3 years ago

    That's fine. People who don't care about cookies will accept them anyway and those who do care about cookies will know not to visit that site anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I feel like people would have responded to this meme better if you didn't depict the European Union as an NPC

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 38 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    Oh boo I can't visit American propaganda websites what a loss to my European life style

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 35 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    So far I’ve only seen small US newspaper who did this. Is anyone angry about this?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There's a medical website that appears in top searches (forget the name) that does it too but yeah, mostly seems to be news websites but not the big ones. In most cases Unlock Origin or the like can hide the panel they throw up to choose if you really need the info or archive or 12ft ladder can get you the info.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Serious question: I know that there are tracking cookies and the user should be able to decline those,but most sites have an auth cookie that stores you're credentials. The devs can store it in a different place like local storage but thats really unsecured.what can the devs do in this situation when the user decline all cookies?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago

    The EU is not stupid. They categorized cookies into the necessary ones for site-usage and those that aren't. So developers just categorize their session cookie (rightfully) as necessary and that's it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 22 points 3 years ago

    I generally agree with the statment under that image and it's certainly a funny meme but also Illegal, sadly the enforcment is a joke but that's not really the laws fault!

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That's literally the point though...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    Nearly all of these are illegal, but sadly there is little enforcement when it comes to this. (Tracking must be opt-in, not opt-out. Ignoring a banner must be interpreted as declining. Opting out must be a simple option, not navigating a complex and misleading menus. The users choice applies to any form of tracking, not just cookies...)

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›