all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 2 years ago*

it's unethical to hurt the feelings of the empire's patrons

  • source
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    why are you letting your government officials use fucking AI in the first place? that is concerning

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • The US military is the definition of an organization with more dollars than sense. The DoD is one of Microsoft AI's largest clients, defense companies regularly spit out high cost shitboxes as a jobs program, and they are the least cost effective organization in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Unless you have an explicit whitelist of what's allowed then you have to maintain a blacklist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Whitelisting technology is how every company I'm aware of works. They only allow whitelisted software because they only use what they are licensed to use. This includes AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    US military does not want its soldiers using an AI where the US military intelligence can't see and track what their soldiers are looking up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You can run it locally. It has less security concerns than anything by OpenAI.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    Reached for comment Admiral Bittewhiner has this to say: "LA LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU"

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Afraid their own servicemembers might see the truth of their bullshit orders?

  • source