top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 290 points 3 years ago (10 children)

I love the implication here, that they don't have the proper source (or skills left in the company) such that they can remove the DRM which doesn't play nice themselves so they rely on a cracked copy of the game instead. Been quite a bit of news lately about how game companies have failed to keep the original source code for their games. Diablo 2, the Transformers games etc and those from active companies, there's bound to be 1000s of games where the source is lost due to publishers closing down studios.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 131 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Logical next step, hacker sues the developer for copyright infringement?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 110 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It's a complete crapshow IMO.

    I still have the source code for the simple stuff I developed over 12 years ago, but these organisations don't think it's important to hang on to source code and assets for something they plan to make money from?

    Really telling about the attitudes towards software outside of the FOSS space and datahoarder communities, and more importantly how little the management/publishers actually care about the product.

    Although to counter that, I'm aware of at least one situation where the opposite has happened. One of my simulation games for example is really buggy and isn't able to receive more updates because the studio behind it voluntarily disbanded, leaving the publisher without access to the source code (I believe the publisher Aerosoft has tried to get a copy of the source to provide further game fixes, but the individuals behind the disbanded studio could not come to an agreement on this)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I've had teams not bother to keep proper history when moving from subversion to git and I've also had a DevOps team entirely wipe the history of a new project just because cloning took a long time (and refused to attempt shallow cloning).

    So the idea that a company just lets their code "rot" to the point of not even having it anymore because it's just some legacy thing from over a decade ago is totally unsurprising to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Even if they have the source, they may not have all the build tools anymore.

    Or they have the build tools but the wizard that set up the build system back in the day no longer works there.

    Or they have the build system archived and documented but it doesn't run because some license expired, and the tool vender doesn't sell that version anymore.

    In the near future, there will be another possibility - SaaS cloud tools that are impossible to preserve so they are forever lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 233 points 3 years ago (17 children)

    Remember that time a random player DRAMATICALLY decreased load times for GTA online after finding bad code that preloaded TONS of game assets? After like, a decade?

    Pepperidge Farm remembers...

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    I believe it was a CSV file of every item in all of the shops (comma separated values) and it was being read and stored into memory single threaded so it was maxing out a single core on the CPU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    JSON, and it had more to do with how they were checking string lengths. But yeah, the general story is that a random dude fixed massive problems with the text parsing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 3 years ago (3 children)
  • [+] 145 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 80 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    The initial source (or at least the one linked to in the reddit post) is the vastly inferior microblogging version of xvideos though, so skipping reddit would have been even worse 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 74 points 3 years ago* (21 children)
  • [–] 63 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (20 children)
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • [–] 55 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Better than their in-house attempts to remove anti-piracy measures. The Steam release of Manhunt has had all of its bullshit triggered for over ten years now. It's literally impossible to play without community patches.

    Edit: Lol, as it turns out, Silent's discovery of this was triggered by the recent revelation of this about Manhunt!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 44 points 3 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    It's not really a crack, it's the corporate activation script. But yeah, MS don't care about sales anymore, they're all about stealing your data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago

    The information the OS collects is not worth more than keeping you in the ecosystem itself. That's the more lucrative reasoning. Can't easily sell other products if they're not in Windows. The information collection is just gravy.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 3 years ago

    Or Ubisoft. A colleague of mine was super hyped for Far Cry 2, both the collector's edition but it wouldn't start on his PC. He contacted Ubisoft support and they gave him an actual scene crack. There were other reported cases of Ubisoft support handing out scene cracks to go around their shitty DRM.

    "A" for effort for the support people in finding ways for customers to be happy and play the games they paid for. But a Steam release for a humongous corporation just straight up using the crack and releasing it as is, that's a new low.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Doesn't even surprise me anymore. Rockstar has gone to shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (14 children)

    What i'm looking at? What is this from?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    Hidden text within the app code from the steam folder

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    When you view or edit a text (.txt) file in a text editor like Notepad, you're most often opening a file in ASCII encoding that uses the ASCII binary values for common letters, numbers and punctuation. The only values allowed in that kind of file are lowercase letters, uppercase letters, numbers and punctuation.

    You can also view or edit binary files, like executables (.exe), but you typically need a hex editor. If you tried to open a binary file in a plain text editor it wouldn't know how to handle all the binary values that are not part of the standard ASCII set of letters, numbers and punctuation.

    Hex editors show the data in hexadecimal format. They convert the binary data to numbers from 0 to 15 where the numbers 10 to 15 are replaced by the letters A to F. Often to make it clear people are talking about the hex number they add "0x" in front of the number. So, 0 becomes 0x0, 9 becomes 0x9, 15 becomes 0xF, 16 becomes 0x10, and 255 becomes 0xFF. This is an efficient way for people to work with binary data because 16 is 2^4^ or 222*2.

    Within binary files, there will still be a lot of sections that are in ASCII. For example, any error messages that have to be printed out for the user to see, like "this program cannot be operated in DOS mode".

    Razor 1911 is an infamous cracker group that has been around for decades. They often "sign" the programs they crack by putting "Razor 1911" inside the files, in a way where you can see it if you open it with a hex editor, but so it doesn't affect the program.

    So, what this is suggesting is that a program that Rockstar has released on Steam is not something they built themselves, but they're actually distributing a cracked version that was released by Razor 1911.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Not the first time, won't be the last.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Vestigial DNA

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It means cracker fixed the issue for the developer, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Imagine if they distributed one of those that contained a strange bind syscall somewhere with a reverse shell.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›