A Republican Congresswoman who has been “missing” for the past six months has finally been found.

Rep. Kay Granger has served as the representative for Texas’s 12th Congressional District since 1997.

However, she suddenly disappeared from the public eye around July this year, when she cast her final vote against an amendment to reduce the salary of Deputy Assistant Administrator for Pesticide Programs to $1.

A curious reporter at the local Dallas Express newspaper did some digging on Granger’s whereabouts and has finally been able to give her constituents some answers.
[...]

We then received a tip from a Granger constituent who shared that the Congresswoman has been residing at a local memory care and assisted living home for some time after having been found wandering lost and confused in her former Cultural District/West 7th neighborhood.

The Dallas Express team visited the facility to confirm whether Granger was residing there and to inquire about how she planned to vote on the spending bill. Upon arrival, two employees confirmed that Granger is indeed living at the facility.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 283 points 2 years ago* (18 children)

To be fair, dementia is not much of a hindrance for making GOP policies.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 156 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    Shouldn't something like that be reported when it happens? She's an elected official. Her seat has effectively been empty for at least six months now.

    It's a small shit in the toilet-tub that is the current political state, but come on.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Overall, some has to sign off on her going into the facility. Assuming it's one of those locked in so they don't wander out type places. You would have to make that person some sort of mandatory reporter. Which I guess you could, but you would then essentialy require them to dig into a person's past, when currently thier job is just to ascertain the person's current mental state. Really this is the job of the legislature to track if she is showing up for work and declare her chair empty if not. Oregon has a rule that if you miss ten days of session in a row, you can't run again. This was to prevent walk outs. But it would also serve your purpose. But state legislatures aren't in session most of the time. So you would still get a big gap. But if it is not in session, the person's absence doesn't really matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    To be fair, much patient care happens without knowing what the patient actually does or did for a living. Sometimes it comes up organically, sometimes doctors, nurses, caregivers ask, and sometimes it never comes up.

    If the patient is what we would call a “poor historian” which is a typical thing that is found with dementia care patients (do you know where you are right now? And they really don’t, so deep dives don’t occur past the how oriented to present reality is this patient, beyond those generic determination questions, when they fail.)

    So let’s say she has no family. Shows up in hospital, doctors determine dementia, she’s stable and it’s time to go, physical and occupational therapy in conjunction with the MD determine a lack of safety to going home alone so it’s now decided for this patient to go to a care home, and she goes to a care home. Who then, inside the care home, says: oh, maybe I should call the Texas legislature about this random patient of whom I know nothing personal, never mind HIPAA.

    How would they know? How could they talk if they did, given HIPAA?

    Or there is a relative making decisions by phone who never thinks, oh, maybe I should call her boss and tell them. They just miss that part in the midst of everything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago

    She has staff. Anyone with dementia bad enough to be in a care facility would have been showing clear signs for a while. At no point did the staff think to check or do anything for the past 6 months? What have they been doing while she's been in there?

    SOMEONE knew she was there and has been actively hiding that fact for 6 months.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    True when it comes to the facility staff. But Congresspeople also have Congressional staff. Those people should’ve reported it, and should be held accountable for not. Which isn’t a law that I know of and of course won’t happen, but it should.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Sure, absolutely that can and does happen.

    But this is not a hypothetical situation. She has family. She has friends. She had an entire staff that worked for her. She is not only a public figure she is a part of the US government. She represents a portion of the US population. Everyone that knew her all decided not to tell anyone what was going on, for a very long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 115 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Imagine not showing up to your job for 6 months and people just going, "hmmm, I wonder where they are."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    How the fuck does a Senator go missing for SIXTH FUCKING MONTHS and no one bothers looking for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

    Her aids were probably running the show for years. What happens with these congress critters is that they create a support network around themselves to do the real work while they campaign for the next election. It gets to the point that the congress member themselves becomes superfluous. If it goes on long enough, they fall into dementia, but the aids don't want to start over again with someone new, so they just tote their boss around from time to time like Weekend at Burnie's. It happened with Dianne Feinstein. It's probably happening with Mitch McConnell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 69 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    She’ll be the 2028 president

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago*

    Sorry, American CEO Musk will have eliminated that unnecessary office by then.

    And really, it wasn't generating very good revenue for the shareholders any more. The board suggested going in a new direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago

    This seems like a pretty important job to not just shuffle the person doing it into an old folks home! Like come on!
    Literally a limited number per state. Even an midmanager would get called for running out of PTO way before then.

  • source
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    We need a maximum age for politicians. At all levels. And term limits. At all levels.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Let's talk about that woman later. Wtf is going on in Texas?? "An amendment to reduce the salary of Deputy Assistant Administrator for Pesticide Programs to $1" what did that person do that they put that on the agenda? Why is it possible to set a salary that low?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    From what I see his name was Jake Li and he was attempting to safeguard endangered species against pesticides. So... His position is now vacant. Guessing Texas couldn't stand for it

    He/they released this, so maybe I would have to more digging to gain further understanding.

    https://texasfarmbureau.org/epa-releases-final-endangered-species-herbicide-strategy/

    Edit: it appears he was "brought in" to that position when Biden entered office, and he is moving to the Department of Interior's fish and wildlife division. I suspect that they knew the upcoming and current cuts to the EPA would thin them out and the Fish and Wildlife department is less likely to be gone after, as that's who you get your hunting/fishing etc licenses from. I imagine the establishment that gives out licenses to shoot animals for fun, isn't likely to be targeted by Republicans

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Realize that's she's a US house member, not a state legislature member. They were trying to defund the EPA in general by reducing salaries for individuals to $1 and it wasn't just Texas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Which is funny, because both Texas and Oklahoma ignore the EPA anyway. The Oklahoma turnpike authority is trying to pollute Norman’s drinking water, and build a turnpike through land that endangered toads live on. They aren’t conducting any sort of environmental impact assessment, because Oklahoma gave them permission not to. Texas has probably hundreds, if not thousands, of improperly shut down oil wells which spew all kinds of pollution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    As I recall, she had a lot of mounting legal troubles over the Ft. Worth billion-dollar flood control project, which apparently funneled taxpayer cash to her son. And then there was that whole trip to Russia to meet with Putin on July 4th thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Who's been doing her job since then? There is no way that can be legal. I'd bet the farm the same thing is happening to Mitch McConnell. No way that old bag of dust and bones is competent enough to do his job.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago*

    Is this what they mean by Reaganism?

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

    Why not have a cut off age?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    Hmm I see. Her generation continues to be an utter fucking embarrassment when it comes to politics.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Why the fuck is she still getting a paycheck?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    at least they didn't reelect her for 2025-26

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Only because she decided not to run again lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

    I’ve encountered 90 year olds that can walk, maybe even run circles around 50-60 year olds, mentally and physically.

    That said, this is something we keep seeing. Feinstein was painful to see, and a clear example of what should never be allowed to happen. We need an age cap.

    A policy like that is also ethically sound in that, and I’ve heard this floated before in multiple places, in that the politician will then have to sit back as an outsider and look at the impact of what they did.

    As is, our politicians are free from that in being able to die in office or retire to dementia care instead of FEELING the impact of what they’ve done, or pointedly not done, while in office.

    Age cap: 70. Done. You can run if you’re going to turn 70 in office, let’s be generous, but once you’re over 70 you can no longer run for an office.

    Enforced retirement of judges for the same reason. Hit 70, you finish or transfer the cases you’re working on and when that’s done you’re done. Who knows how much inertia is fueling a waxing/waning cusp of Dementia judge when there’s no real focus on this across the many courtrooms of the country.

    But I’ll probably be accused of ageism here. It’s a nice way to solve ethics problems, infirmity problems, and add in a soft cap term limitation.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Americans desperate after missing out on the best presidential candidate

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    Let me guess, Granger continued to collect her paycheck while "missing."

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    sounds like she's clearly just getting in touch with the local population

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›