this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
1256 points (92.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29773 readers
446 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 163 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Texas does not have a monopoly on y'all. Y'all is collective, both as a noun, and as ownership. Y'all is Southern for Comrade.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Was this post designed to offend all non Texan southerners

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Oh! Oh! Lemmy try! Lemmy try!

Ahem.

"Beans do not belong in chili."

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ya'll better watch out now y'hear? We don take kindly to that kind'a hate speech 'round these parts. Equal weight beans and beef, you skimp out either and yain't fixin' chili; you might'ina even be inclined to leave for everyone's sake.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Bless your heart 😒😒

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Idk but if so, mission accomplished I guess

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I refuse to accept Texas' claim on y'all. Its a word collectively owned by everyone south of the mason-dixon line and I will fight to the death over this.

Signed, floridaman

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (7 children)

…Am I not allowed to use "y'all", north of the 49th parallel? Do we have to bring back "thou" so "you" can be plural again? Or is this part of the Quebecois plot to force everyone to parler en français donc nous pouvons utiliser "vous"? C'est bien, anyway, j'suppose.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fun fact:

"Thou" and "you" were the same word.

The "th" sound used to have its own character in written English called the thorn. When typefaces came along, it was excluded and sometimes replaced with a "y."

Also why "Ye" and "The" are the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is it bad that I'm more bothered by "j'suppose" than the inclusion of "anyway"?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (15 children)

“You” is also ungendered. There seems to be a common idea that English is missing a second person plural. We have one, it’s “you”. We just stopped using the second person singular. That’s what all those variations of “thee, thou, thy” etc were.

“Y’all” would be a superpluralization. If that’s still not enough we also have the ultraplural form of, “all y’all”

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All y'all's "all y'all" for all and for y'all

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Y'all is not Texan. Y'all is Southern and Texas is Southern wannabe.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Texas is a southern wannabee

See also: Florida.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Florida is so redneck that they crossed a threshold into its own category. Florida Man.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

That’s why conservatives have started to say yim’all and yer’all in order needlessly gender the expression. Can’t believe these folks sometimes.

Edit: 😂

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Really? I've never heard that and I'm in Texas

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Darn tootin

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

y'all is second person plural. First and Second person aren't gendered. Therefore, I is also woke

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

OMG yes! We must make this a thing, make the right speak in caveman to fit their troglodyte nature! Lol

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's actually a contraction from old English or Scots and has been around since 1631. The hicks are using socialist words that aren't theirs.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Y'all is the best pronoun.

It's second person can be used singular or plural, and the difference is all contextual.

It's ungendered and it's makes almost anything feel "more fun."

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For those of you who aren't woke yet, I just made a fresh pot of coffee.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Y'all Texans can go to hell for trying to claim y'all.

  • Signed a Louisianan

P.s. your El Paso 857 sign can go right to hell too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the oldest published "Y'all" was from Richmond Virginia in 1856 in the Southern Literary Messenger

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The onlie trans community uses y'all a lot. And howdy and haiii :3

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Y'all was created to serve a completely artificial problem.

English has second person singular pronouns, but for some dumbfuck reason we've deprecated them. It's still maintained in the standard for compatibility with legacy literature but not recommended for new works. If thou talk'st this way, thy speech comes off as archaic/shakesperian/biblical. So we use the second person plural for everything. But this removes the ability to encode context on how many thou art addressing. "You! Go put that fire out." Are you talking to an individual in a group or the whole group?

So the American south turned "you" into the singular form and invented "you all" contracted to "y'all" for the plural form.

Now we just need to fix the first person plural problem, ie "We've just won the lottery!" Does "we" include the listener, or not? English doesn't encode that information; "we" don't have different words for "myself the speaker and the listener(s) and perhaps others" and "Myself the speaker, others, but not the listener."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

From now on, my pronouns are yall

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

"language is the universal whore that i must make into a virgin"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I started using y'all years ago due to its ungenderedness, in part from being in queer spaces. Walking into a room of trans women and enbies and saying "you guys" felt weird.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's also a good substitute for "you guys"

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›