all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 85 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

They will justify what they want. The rules are made up, and the laws don't matter.

I've made my peace with the eventual gestapo knock on my door. If you haven't, just stop using social media entirely but it's probably to late if you can see this.

Even not having an account is enough I would guess (I'm no computer wizard). Even wizards screw up a spell now and again (thanks computer wizards for your community service, I do love gaming a shitton and lemmy is Hella rad)

IP addresses linked to threads opened, comments sections browsed can be used to create a profile by some dipshit AI programmed by some dipshit. Zero social media is the only way. Just don't look at it.

Just don't look

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Opting out of social media these days is considered inherently suspicious. It definitely came up the last time I had to undergo a background check for work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    I have a LinkedIn account. It has the list of recent jobs I’ve held and my education.

    That’s my social media presence.

    Things like Lemmy are my secondary presence that I keep anonymous.

    It’s never been an issue during my background checks. But then, if anyone ever dared to ask me about my lack of presence, I’d give them a level stare and tell them that I practice what I preach.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I have created a Home Alone inspired shotgun trap at my front door for when the inevitable comes knocking at my door for shitposting too close to the sun. (This is also a shitpost, maybe)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I didn't agree to shit. If I did agree it was probably because some company twisted my arm and didn't offer a more respectable service that doesn't gobble up every bit of data to resell possible. Probably through every mobile carrier.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    Agreeing to location services for the purpose of performing the apps intended use, is not the same as agreeing that the government can track your location on a whim. Where the fuck are the constitutional lawyers who fight this kind of egregious constitutional violation?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Reminds me of that disney case where they claimed agreeing to the terms on disney+ meant they could kill that guys wife.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (7 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Welcome to Post Sarire Reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    There should be an edit function on a comment. Of course clients and federation vary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    There is but I didn't want to visibly edit the comment 14 hours (or however long) after I made it.

    Hope that's ok with you and a good enough reason for my choice. Or do you have more 'advice'?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The trick that the Government has learned is that it's easier and cheaper to buy your location data from a third party.

    No warrant necessarily since the data is available to anyone who wants to buy it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    https://archive.ph/VJKSE

    Here's the article without the fucking pay wall.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    404 demanding my private information to access their article about how I shouldn't give my private information to companies.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    We need protections limiting the length and level of effect of clickwrap agreements.

    For now, I will continue using "inspect element" to change the text "agree" to "disagree", and completely skip proprietary phone apps.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    You change the text? That's only on the user side, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago