My salary didn't change at all, but homes went up 82%. The money I saved for a down payment and my salary no longer are good enough for this home and many others. This ain't even a "good" home either. It was a 200k meh average ok home before. Now it's simply unaffordable

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 110 points 2 years ago (5 children)

You just need to stop watching Netflix and buying avocado toast.

At least that's what old people say anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago*

    Not to devalue your point, but if you truly were spending (10 + 3*75 + 20)*30 + 150 per month (so a total of 7800 USD) and you invest it in an index fund getting back 5%, you'll have your million in 10 years. 8 years at 10% which is the long-term growth rate of DJIA and S&P 500.

    You'll still never be the richest person in the world, but if you truly were burning away that much money, you could make decent dough just from investing it passively. In 30 years you'd have like 15 million, more than enough to retire.

    Now the only real problem is that nearly nobody is actually burning that much cash and the "stop eating avocado toast" suggestions are indeed stupid af.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 49 points 2 years ago (7 children)
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    A house in Austin

    2018: $275,000
    2022: $725,000

    Those are actual numbers from East Austin. I believe the 2024 market rate is $625,000 but it hasn't changed hands again so I can't say for certain.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    And conservative Texans keep laughing that californians are moving to Texas because "They hate the blue politics", never guessing that they would bring their blue politics and money with them, driving up land value. Definitely not saying that they're bad, but that it's ironic that they didn't think through the consequences

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Is this one of the areas where corps are buying up a shitload of real estate?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago*

    If it's on Zillow then yes. The trick is to find houses that are not on MLS/Zillow...but realistically there are none. GL! We got ours wnd in one year it went up 40%in a year.

    Also in my area that house is a steal and would have offers before it hit Zillow.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    My lucky ass bought a house in late 2019. I'm happy I'm making money on it but this doesn't seem healthy

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 34 points 2 years ago

    I like the utility feed hanging off the front of the house going straight through the roof and blocking them from installing the other fake shutter. I wonder what other construction horrors lurk inside.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Tbh this is more than mildly infuriating...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    This is everywhere. I've been looking for houses for 3 months in NW Ohio. 300k is the new 150k, and all the houses are beat to shit on the inside needing 50k just to make them passable inside because nobody takes care of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Being able to buy a $200,000 house in the town I live in would change my life so much.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Friend of mine was saving up for a house 5 years ago. Prices have gone up almost 150%

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Yeah that was me too... I FINALLY got to the point where I could realistically start looking, got the pre-approval and everything just after COVID started... People had already starting WFH and moving away from where they worked and investment companies kept buying and now I'm still living in someone else's garage because prices went through the roof pretty much as I was looking...

    Of course once you mention WFH everyone gets defensive and claims this was a trend, but those charts are the same everywhere. Houses in 2018-19 were often less than half of what they cost now...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    This won't change as long as property ownership and property renting is unified. There's just to much of a business incentive from renting, even if it takes decades to make it back. Worst that can happen is that it can sell it back to a market that criminalizes homelessness instead of treating it or its causes.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    About everywhere... In Toronto it's now 1 million+. In Vancouver it's now 2 millions+

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is because venture capitalists are buying all the homes to rent

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Not that this is "ok" but it's why "buy whatever you can as soon as you can" is good advice. If you'd put whatever you had into a shitty condo four years ago, and kept saving at the same rate, you'd likely be in good position to trade up soon.

    I see a lot of people I know end up in the same position because they've been waiting for either the exact right circumstances or for prices to "crash." All the people i know who started with anything they could afford now have a huge amount of equity in nice homes. The difference is real and primarily about timing more than income or location.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So occasionally I look out of curiosity and the reason is pretty plain.

    I look for houses for sale in a suburban area as public listings, and there's like 1 within a few square miles of the area.

    I switch over to renting, and there's like 12 houses just like the one for sale available, all owned by companies. I also know a coule that aren't listed that have no tenants, but are still owned by one of those companies. You can tell because those yards are now waist deep grasses (in an area where HOA throws a hissy fit if your yard looks just a smidge unkempt).

    Don't know why the companies find it more profitable to buy houses people aren't looking to actually move into, at least at the rent they are willing to accept. If I fully understood why, it might just piss me off more. Like maybe the houses work better as a loan basis than other assets, so even empty and unused they are valuable as some sort of financial trick.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Don’t know why the companies find it more profitable to buy houses people aren’t looking to actually move into, at least at the rent they are willing to accept. If I fully understood why, it might just piss me off more. Like maybe the houses work better as a loan basis than other assets, so even empty and unused they are valuable as some sort of financial trick.

    That's one thing, but housing has been a low-risk investment for a long, long time. If they bought the house OP posted in 2020 and sold it in 2024 they would have almost doubled their money even without renting it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    My janky duct tape together house I bought in 2010, that was built in '58 was 98k. In 12 years I sold it at 280k, with it still technically being out of code. My house was the cheapest sold in the neighborhood, some selling for 320k. It's insane.

  • source
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If it makes you feel any better, that house would sell for at least double that price where I live.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Y'all realize this is a bubble, right? I almost feel sorry for these investors, gonna have their ass handed to them in the coming decade.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago*

    It’s the same in Kansas City. I just checked a random house in my city and it’s up almost $100k in 4 years.

    3bd, 1bath 976 sqft

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    A 1200 sqft bungalow near me just sold for 1 million Canadian rubles

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Houses in my neighborhood are up 150-200%.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›