this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro

555 readers
11 users here now

About

A community for leftists and progressives within the Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro Area, including all suburbs and exurbs.

Community banner courtesy of @[email protected] ❤️

Guidelines

  1. Be nice

  2. Comment substantively

  3. Probably some other stuff

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This fall, Minnesotans will vote on whether to renew a proposal earmarking some money from the state lottery to fund environmental programs, including parks projects, conservation and clean water efforts.

Back in 1988, voters approved a Minnesota constitutional amendment dedicating a portion of lottery proceeds to the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. Since then, voters have thrice renewed the proposal. However, a new provision this year reserves 1.5 percent of funds for projects in underserved communities.

Rep. Athena Hollins, DFL-St. Paul, sponsored the 2023 bill to reauthorize the earmark and told MPR News that the change would help ensure money doesn’t just go to large organizations.

“Think like University of Minnesota, Conservation Minnesota, groups that have been well established and also have the time and staffing to be able to apply to this grant process,” she said. “And so what we're trying to do is provide an opportunity for other organizations, maybe smaller organizations, organizations that are more community-led and focused, grassroots, to be able to access a tiny amount of this money and hopefully then grow to be able to participate in the full LCCMR process.”

LCCMR, or Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources, is a group of legislators and citizens that makes funding recommendations to the legislature for the use of the trust’s money. Through that process, it’s allocated $1.5 billion to more than 2,600 projects since its founding in 1963.

Last month, a group of more than 130 conservation and environmental organizations and businesses announced they’d campaign together to convince voters to support renewing the amendment which needs a clear majority to pass. Since it’s a constitutional amendment, leaving the ballot question blank counts as a no-vote — and some proponents told MPR News they were worried the presidential election and other races would overshadow this.

“I think when people understand the question, they are wholeheartedly in favor of it, and I think it’s one of the things that unites us as Minnesotans: We love the outdoors, and we will protect it,” Hollins said. “It’s really important that people not just look at it and say, ‘Well, that sounds like a good idea.’ They need to proactively vote yes for it.”

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

If anybody's unaware btw, voting early with an in-person absentee ballot will likely mean you stop getting political mail, since it's recorded that you already voted.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Always check both sides of the ballot and vote on everything.

This is an easy win and something that we should be doing. Investing in the environment is something we should all agree on. We all love the water here. Let's protect it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

I did the barest amount of research on this while filling out my absentee ballot. This is universal net good for the state with basically no downsides. Please vote YES on your ballots this year!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Some? I was actually under the impression that was the principal use of the state scratch off tickets. Maybe ever bought 1 in my 40+ years, would rather buy a fishing license and tick the box on the tax forms to pay the DNR more directly, but every dime helps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Looks like 40%:

Forty percent of lottery net proceeds go to the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF). The remaining 60 percent of net proceeds go toward Minnesota’s General Fund