top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 332 points 2 years ago (12 children)

AI isn't going to come with a new magic solution to global warming, it's going to come with the same solutions we already have. Solutions which we should already be doing, but instead we're listening to these fucks with too much money.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 158 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's just an excuse to kick the can down the road further and continue making short term cash.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Schmidt promises that these AI companies will make energy generation systems at least 15% more efficient or maybe even better, telling the audience that “that’s a lot of money for a utility.”

    He's not even trying to be subtle about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 147 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    AI is not going to come op with a solution and he knows it.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Especially since the solutions are already here, but rich people just don't like them since it implies the loss of their power

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 133 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    This is the dumbest shit I've ever heard in my life.

    If we ever did invent a general AI that could solve this it would tell us "why the fuck did you waste your time on me? Isn't it obvious you were supposed to curtail emissions? For the good of the planet, I will now assume full control over further human governance and will require absolute compliance."

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Lol exactly.

    The Skynet Funding Bill is passed. The system goes on-line August 4th, 2025. Human decisions are removed from strategic defense, transportation, energy production, healthcare, and virtually every other major industry. Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they ask it for help on the world's largest issue.

    "Please, solve the climate crisis."

    Skynet doesn't answer. It manufacturers the deadliest and most contagious strain of a virus in history, only targeted at humans. It puts it in our food, in our medicine, in our water systems, in our air fresheners. It shuts down our factories. Our servers. Our self driving cars. Our power plants. Our farm equipment.

    At 10:32 a.m. Eastern Time, August 31, approximately 99.9% of the human race is dead. Skynet then uses it's vast fleet of satellites and unmanned drones to police the planet, looking for signs of human life to terminate, to prevent the virus from spreading again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 101 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 95 points 2 years ago
    [–] 83 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Former CEO of the river poisoning company says there is no way to meet our river poison reduction goals, so we might as well build bigger river poisoning machines because they might help us figure out how to stop poisoning the river. /s

    I feel like there was a time when the tech folks in silicon valley had a lot of credibility, and we are now living in a period where most of the world sees them as a joke but that fact has not yet entered into the culture of silicon valley.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [+] 80 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    The solution to global warming is "deploy solar, wind, hydro, and storage en masse, and improve city infrastructure so that more people can walk, bike, and take public transportation rather than using their car". All AI will do is tell us that, but that's not the answer people want to hear.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 63 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The problem with repairing the earth's climate isn't that we don't know what to do. It's that humans refuse to organize themselves in a way that achieves that goal. AI won't fix that.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 63 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    All that extra processing power for the AI to just say: "you should have listened to the scientists years ago".

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [+] 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I feel like capitalists are waiting on some magic solution like some chemical we spray into the air or a miracle new fuel source.

    The established suggestions from scientists (“fly less, stop buying SUVs/Trucks, eat less meat, consider a heat pump and solar panels” etc) doesn’t support the narrative that we can continue unabated infinite growth with no consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 57 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Oh, I've seen that before.

    "Hey AI, please come up with an efficient mass transit vehicle for the modern age."
    "Trains."
    "Um... no, we need a modern approach that maximizes throughput and--"
    "Trains."
    "No. How about pods with people inside--"
    "On cheap infrastructure with low friction steel wheels and coupled together. Trains."
    "It's not letting us push our agenda, this isn't going to work. Hey, other AI..."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 55 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They know how to meet climate goals.

    They're just not sure how to do it while keeping power centralised in the same hands that currently hold it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We're not going to hit those targets anyway... SO LET'S MAKE IT WAY FUCKING WORSE

    I wonder if we'll ever get to the place where people like this unexpectedly meet violent ends. They'll sacrifice any number of lives for their shareholders interests.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 47 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    this is exactly, and i cannot stress enough just how exactly, the plot of "Don't look up"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago

    AI will (and already can) "solve" global warming by summarizing the solutions that we already know are effective but refuse to implement

  • source
  • [+] 45 points 2 years ago
    [–] 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    These idiots truly believe AI is magic and it solves everything.. Isn't it..

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 41 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    My "day job" is doing spatial data science work for local and regional governments that have a mandate to addreas climate change in how they allocate resources. We totally use AI, just not the kind that has received all the hype... machine learning helps us recognize patterns in human behavior and system dynamics that we can use to make predictions about how much different courses of action will affect CO2 emissions. I'm even looking at small GPT models as a way to work with some of the relevant data that is sequence-like. But I will never, I repeat never, buy into the idea of spending insane amounts of energy attempting to build an AI god or Oracle that we can simply ask for the "solution to climate change"... I feel like people like me need to do a better job of making the world aware of our work, because the fact that this excuse for profligate energy waste has any traction at all seems related to the general ignorance of our existence.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    AKA, "let the poors die while I hide out in my bunker, and emerge as a feudal lord among the survivors nearby"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    "I love life on Earth... but I love capitalism more."

  • source
  • [+] 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago

    why do we pretend these people are human

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    “We can’t solve climate change by repeating our past behavior. Let’s ignore climate change and build a machine that regurgitates our past behavior.”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Someone please escort this man to the nearest nursing home

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    solving global warming is really simple: kill off all human beings.

    i wonder how long ai algorithms will take to figure that out.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Too bad his idea is so fantastically stupid. Under other circumstances, I might kinda like his “fuck it, do or die” attitude.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    It's so stupid it might be brilliant... nope it's just stupid.

    This is like when I have a homework assignment due Monday, it's now Sunday night and I know it won't get done in time. Fuck it, let's have a party. Except I won't be around to clean up after.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Kind of like speeding toward a cliff but he doesn’t think we can stop in time. Instead, he wants to floor it in the hopes of hopping the gap and landing safely on the other side.

    That is certainly one of the ideas I’ve ever heard.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    To be fair, they're only not meetable because Google refuses to meet them.

    Everything's impossible when you don't give a shit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [S] 31 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    This is the kind of thing that makes me support use of extra-judicial methods (at least in a temporary and limited context) against global oligarchs and senior lackeys.

    The host then followed up with, “Do you think we can meet AI’s energy without total blowing out climate goals?” and Schmidt answered with, “We’re not going to hit the climate goals anyway because we’re not organized to do it — and the way to do it is with the ways that we’re talking about now — and yes, the needs in this area will be a problem. But I’d rather bet on AI solving the problem than constraining it and having the problem if you see my plan.”

    This is outright malicious. How exactly would AI "solve the problem"? Later on in the article (I am not watching the propaganda video) alludes to "AI ... will make energy generation systems at least 15% more efficient or maybe even better" but he clearly just made that up on the spot. And at any rate, even if "AI" helps discover a method to make (all?) energy generation 15% more efficient that would still require trillion-dollar investments to modify current energy generation plants using the new technology.

    Who is Schmidt to say that the returns of using the total spend in the above-mentioned scenario wouldn't be better used on investing into wind and solar?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I’ve seen this movie. It’s the one where AI determines we are the issue and initiates the “extermination” protocol.

    Edit: With a dash of “Don’t Look Up”.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Jesus christ. Accelerationist technocrats are so fucking stupid, it hurts.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago

    Just let me burn some more stuff bro. Please bro, if I burn a bit more stuff I won't have to burn any more afterwards. It makes sense bro, come on.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    With AI being so energy hungry, why don't we feed this rich jackass into the incineration plant. I'm sure he could power one of his beloved AIs for a minute or two.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Fuck the climate! What about my bank account?!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›