top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 171 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Gotta love the use of quotes here:

it should be treated with "utmost importance."

In other words, ignore this message from our lawyers.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 115 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    This whole message reads like “we don’t actually care but we have to say that we do 😉🙂‍↕️”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 140 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    If the uni has a license what's the issue lol

    Also kinda shitty of those companies to charge educational instutions

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Not only shitty, it's dumb. Even Adobe knows to give students hefty discounts. It's how they get new users on the hook.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 115 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    As a french, please don't give a penny worth of licence to Dassault Systèmes. They were founded by some of the worst ennemy of the people my country made.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago*

    SW was great to use back in uni but holy hell is it full of phone home stuff and really annoying these days, I scrapped my license, they straight up wouldn't let me cancel within 30 days of renewal so I yanked my cc and "cancelled" that way.

    Use FreeCAD, mentioned in a few posts, it's got some clunk but it's 100% useable, has more than enough features for prosumer/hobbyist use, personally I'd make an argument it's fine for enterprise use too, Ondsel seems to think so considering that's the market they're targeting with their releases. I'd recommend the Ondsel release or Realthunder's (what I currently use) which has features/fixes that will be merged back, and 100% look at mainline freecad when the 1.0 release drops

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 75 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Thumb of rule is, If you don't make enough to comfortably pay for some software; you simply don't pay for said software.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Yup, this is why I didn't pay for REAPER until the check for my first audiobook came through!

    I'm still waiting for that check from the author, but you best believe $60 of it is going to the software that made that job possible!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 70 points 2 years ago

    PhD students as well as all students of all levels need to use pirated software to fully develop their abilities.Trash this warning.

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Pro tip: Always use a program like binisoft windows firewall control

    Look at companies like this. The software KNOWS it has been cracked but instead of disabling itself it sends home your info so you can get sued for copyright infringement

    Ps: I'm curious to know the price of the geovia suite. I'm guessing it's a subscription and I'm guessing it's more than 10k per year

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That is some next-level Minecraft you are playing over there

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    If it's on a students personal device, they can suck my hullabaloo

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That reminds me, I got a very threatening email from my college in 2000s about downloading movies and that they traced the IP to my laptop, and I could be paying $10k in fines, have this on my permanent record and/or expelled.

    I loled and pirated a lot more safer.

    Still waiting for them to follow up with that 20 years later.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    Adobe did the same in my friend's animation college

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    Imagine using pirated software and allowing it to go online. Loco 🤯

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    We also had expensive engineering software at university. Oftentimes it's a major PITA for everyone. The PhD students have to get their work done and are met by the software refusing to start because all licenses are taken. Sometimes someone forgot to log off or the computer crashed and the software takes most of the day to recover that license. Or some people do like 5 simulations in parallel. Or lock the computer, go home and block a license. The IT department will get lots of calls and have to deal with it. Especially when the pool of licenses is small. And it takes additinal effort to coordinate practical courses and excercises where you teach a group of 24 people which then need half the license pool available at a fixed time each week, despite the daily routine of everyone else.

    And I'm not even sure if the people responsible, care too much for pirated software. But they're liable. Of course they write strongly worded mails when talking to everyone. It's their IT infrastructure and they can't have people do illegal things with it. Especially not while having an expensive contract with some supplyer. They can't have anyone leak a mail where they endorse piracy. Or post screenshots or turn in assignments or papers with screenshots that say "unregistered copy" in the bottom corner. And once students do silly things and the piracy is on display publicly, they'll have to do something. Usually that's writing a strongly worded email first. Because that takes next to no effort. I think the usual IT department doesn't care as long as things go smoothly, people do their various things and no one complains. They usually have other stuff to do. That makes me think in this story something must have happened that warranted some form of public reaction or at least show they addressed it and they have it in writing.

    And I think the rest of the mail fits such IT people. They said why they do it and that they can't have piracy connected to the institutes name. They say they need some incoming complaints to justify buying more licenses. And the punishment fits the crime. They just disconnect the computer from their network and it's not their problem anymore. I think that's fair.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    It should be treated with "utmost importance", not with utmost importance. That ending is quite subversive!

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I would hope they're not using static IPs and MAC address spoofing is a thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    So thry're saying they have plenty of licenses for the use case, but somehow people are still pirating?

    Maybe their license management paradigm is just garbage. This could be the vendor, but also poor IT policy if the users can't requisition what they need.

    As usual, service problem.

    So much licensing fuckery-- dealing with floating or reissuing licenses, users needing to move to different machines-- could be solved via affordable site licensing. But that might leave dollars on the table if users don't overbuy.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Shucks... Maybe if the college didn't rob the students blind on tuition, and the publishers not rob the students blind on books, maybe they could afford to pay for software licenses. 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    they should have put dorm numbers on there so you could meet some cool people. sharing is caring.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    How did they detect it? Did these people install the pirated software on devices owned and managed by the college, or did they use their personal devices and only connect to the network? Anyway, they definitely should have used a VPN.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    These softwares use your pc's network connections to send data to the servers which then checks whether you paid a license or not. When they can't use your internet connection, they also add personal information to any file you generate with the softwares such that if you send the file to someone else who has a license they will unknowingly rat on you through their connection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    When they can’t use your internet connection, they also add personal information to any file you generate with the softwares such that if you send the file to someone else who has a license they will unknowingly rat on you through their connection.

    This sounds evil, possibly violating some EU laws too.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Seems like you have to buy... a VPN so that they won't see you using pirated software.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Pretty much every software crack says 'Block this application in your firewall'. I guarantee most people don't. Following these instructions would have prevented this entirely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Some people never learn. My Academy requires students to log in with their university account, so they know who does what.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›