top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 101 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Maybe next time don't support someone that tried to overthrow the government.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Did they support Trump though? He spoke at the RNC but his speech was vehemently anti-Republican.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Honestly, as someone who lost their job, in part, thanks to Sean O'Brien, I really applauded his speech to the RNC. It was great.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If he cost you your job, you were on borrowed time anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I definitely won't go into it in details for obvious reasons, it's mostly management failing to negotiate in good faith, just trying to say while I've plenty of personal reason to have beef with him, but really appreciate what he has to say

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    Dude tried to play both sides against the middle as the GOP was fumbling the ball.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Blue collar union dipshits are a majority Trump supporters and don't think they're voting against their interests. Its not surprising he went to the RNC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The leopards! My facccee!!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    In this thread: "bothering to reach half the country who tends not to agree (or understand) your positions is icky".

    Y'all need to get on board with diversity of tactics. Memeing on your ass isn't going to cut it alone.

    The union's job is to empower the workers, like it or not, by getting inserted at the RNC, it will have a lasting impact.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Case in point, is it more impactful to hear a criticism of Trump from a DNC speaker or an RNC speaker? Wtf is the actual complaint here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    His presence gives the Republicans standing to claim (however falsely) that they're the party of working people.

    I get the argument, but it seems to me that the RNC took advantage of him much more than the other way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That may be true, but he also got a different kind of message out to a large variety of viewers that was different from the rest of the convention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Looks like yeah actually it was pretty shitty for him to give that speech there https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/17/teamsters-sean-obrien-rnc-speech

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    This comment chain has illustrated how effective control over corporate media is. All I knew before was that he spoke at the RNC, and assumed the worst, which I'm sure was the intention. The content of his speech is definitely not widely distributed.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Alternative Headline: Union boss who sold out for power flip-flops after angering its paying members and realizing he will likely lose current position next union election cycle. This and more at 11....

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (11 children)

    Did you watch his speech? He wasn't there cause he sold out. He was there to give a message. Your kneejerk reaction shows you didn't even watch his speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (9 children)

    No shit right?

    Most lemmings don't seem to be able to get past a sophmore level of analysis on politics.

    To Lemmy users who just don't get it: The headline was "Headline speaker at night one of RNC refuses to endorse Trump"

    Sean O’Brien used the RNC as a platform to deliver the most pro-labor, pro-progressive, anti-capitalist speech of ALL TIME. As in, hands down, the most progressive speech, at ANY major party political convention EVER.

    He took the platform, and didnt endorse the candidate. Do you have any idea how big of a fucking deal that is?

    If you are mad that Sean O'Brien took the opportunity to use a platform he was offered to speak truth to power, this is you:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    To be fair it hasn't paid dividends weeding through mountains of vitriolic, bigotry and small-mindedness for a literal diamond in the rough. It's not too far fetched to see how many could think speaking at a party convention for fascist asshats is a tacit endorsement.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Dickhead trying to crawl back.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Slams! Dut duh duh, dut duh duh. Let the boys be boys!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›