all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 67 points 2 years ago (6 children)

No one wants Shapiro. Which means she will probably pick Shapiro. The dems always sabotage themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I’m worried about this too. As a Jew I feel pretty weird about this whole thing. I’m generally against Israel and everything they do, and frankly I don’t care about having the first Jewish VP. Harris is already married to a Jew, and based on the rampant antisemitism that has only been growing over the last few years, I don’t think the country is ready for or would ultimately want a Jew first in line to the presidency. Doesn’t make it right, but winning is more important right now.

    I think outside of elite circles, antisemitism is way worse than those in the circles think. I’m worried they don’t take the antisemites seriously enough nor do they realize just how antisemitic completely “normal” people are capable of being.

    For example, over the last few weeks in my liberal Northern California community, there has been a group leaving antisemitic fliers (I’m talking swastikas and everything) on cars in parking lots. Antisemites are everywhere, regardless of whether or not Israel is currently committing genocide.

    We need to win, firsts be damned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    A lot of people want Shapiro, actually. Though I would absolutely pick Walz any day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    People under Citizens United, maybe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    I mean, it's irresponsible to think our lemmy bubble is representative of anything. A ton of people think Shapiro is a good pick, though a lot of them either don't know about the Palestine opinions (pretty sure most people didn't know until very recently as it is) and they think it would help with PA

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Non American here. Bernie’s an independent now?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    He's always been independent but caucuses with the Democrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    You have a two-party system and Independents almost never get anywhere. Bernie is the exception in that regard. Consequently they have to work with one of the other two parties if they want to actually accomplish anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Independent since 1981, but he's unsuccessfully run in the Democratic primaries for President.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Interesting! He gets lumped in with democrats doesn’t he.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I got that, was just surprised to see “(I-Vermt)” after his name. Thought it would be Democrat. Deep respect for the guy, this just adds to it for some reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [B] -11 points 2 years ago

    The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Hill:

    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4809450-bernie-sanders-kamala-harris-tim-walz-veepstakes-2024-election/
    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • source