top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 145 points 2 years ago (11 children)

i think actual information is way too difficult to suss out these days with the misinformation campaigns and the paywalls and the trolling, etc.

shit try to do some comparison shopping today and try to figure out which reviews are real and if the thing you're buying is really the thing you think you're buying.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Another issue is that information is easy enough to find that people don't bother to remember things as much anymore, since they can just look up the majority of stuff on Wikipedia or something if they ever need to know it. It leads to people having a smaller pool of background knowledge, which makes them easier to mislead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 74 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Stupidity has never been because of lack of access to information. That's ignorance.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    To the people saying that this is because of "laziness" or "lack of curiosity":

    I'm bombarded with so much information every day that it's not feasible to fact-check it all. I have to pick my battles and take things I care less about at face value until I have a reason not to.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I'm bombarded with so much information every day that it's not feasible to fact-check it all.

    Source?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Have you been on the internet? Source: personal experience.

    Dude, you're on a link aggregator right now, you can't honestly think that you're fact checking every post you read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Dude, you're on a link aggregator right now

    Source?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    No, Lemmy. Source is a game engine, dude.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Nah. We knew the difference between ignorance and stupidity before then.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Lack of applicable or pertinent information is still rampant.

    Excess information of the stupifying type is everywhere.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's still the problem. Information is widely available but misinformation is easier to find and the ones that need information are the ones that find the misinformation

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The problem with internet was always that access to bullshit is way easier than access to information. Except now the difference gets exponentially bigger, and bullshit is indistinguishable from truth.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    I remember seeing a lot of people expand their horizons on all kinds of topics when the internet first started catching on.

    Now I think it was because they were actively looking for understanding something new, and did not represent the general population.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

    Now I think it was because they were actively looking for understanding something new, and did not represent the general population.

    Assuming that intelligence (and I don't mean IQ or any other psychometric "proxy" for intelligence, but intelligence as an abstract trait) is normally distributed like most other traits, 50% of people are going to be dumber than average because in normal distributions the mean is the median. The "general population" is not smart by any definition.

    And anyone trying to claim that intelligence as a concept is completely socially constructed and that there is no difference in intelligence between people, or tries to conflate IQ etc psychometric measures and intelligence, can shove it up their ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Yes and no. If people had access to correct information, rather than every passing thought anyone has ever had ever, including complete fabrications and things that were never meant to be taken seriously, then they'd probably be okay.

    Even making a claim about what is true and factual seems to be a point to be argued on the internet lately.

    We've given everyone a voice and access to everyone else's voice as well as access to all information. Most are lost in the noise, and can't find the signal.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Turns out, people are just stupid and the more information access you give them the more they can reinforce their stupidity with other idiots' opinions

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Ex-fucking-actly. Like I said in another recent comment, the problem with the internet is that it allows the worst people you can imagine to form communities, and instead of them essentially dying alone and shunned by anyone who isn't a complete psychopath they start to think that their fuckwittery is not only acceptable but common

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    People here seem to be mistaking stupidity as a measure of intelligence. Stupidity is a measure of wisdom.

    An abundance of information doesn't fix stupidity in the same way that shoveling water out of a boat with a leak won't stop it from sinking.

    You have to address the leak before shoveling water becomes productive. Or to circle back around, you have to address how someone learns, parses, and applies information before feeding them more information becomes productive.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We shall not confuse data and information. With internet we have access to a lot of data, but information is hard to find. Furthermore information are structured by the institution that made it : university, TV, newspaper, and social network Those dominant institution are not very interested in homelessness or other class struggle in your neighborhood. So relevant information for your social and geographical position is even more rare.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I truly believe it’s a lack of curiosity, people simply are not interested in learning more than they have to.

    That’s why I see curiosity as a gift. Friends think I am intelligent, but I’m simply curious enough to learn things.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Late 90s to 2000s was the decade of internet glory. Then social media and big tech took over. Now with personalized feeds and searches, along with conflict promoting engagement metrics, many people spend their time within echo chambers and those chambers keep getting more partisan. On top of that, rampant misinformation has made it all the more difficult to separate fact from fiction.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Sure, but let's not remove our libraries please.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    We've had libraries since long before the Internet. I don't think lack of access to information is as much to blame as lack of time and/or willingness to make an effort.

    Also, we live in a culture that celebrates, glorifies and rewards stupidity to an insane degree. There is simply very little incentive for people to try and improve themselves.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Plus the access to misinformation. Now where even more stupiderer,

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Kinda? I figured that there's some portion of the population that's not smart - bell-curve statistical distribution and all that. But I always thought that the problem was education, or rather, access to a good^1^ education and all the socio-economic and political boundaries around that.

    To be blunt: modest to insanely powerful people have something invested in keeping such barriers high, and it's worrysome.

    1. Good = a program that teaches critical thinking and has access to liberal arts, trades, traditional arts, libraries, and information technology.
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    To be blunt: modest to insanely powerful people have something invested in keeping such barriers high, and it's worrysome.

    cheaper workers tend to be less intelligent, ergo: prevent children from being expensive by preventing them becoming intelligent see:"a brave new world"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's called the Information Deficit Hypothesis.

    And yes, it's been proven wrong.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Stupid, ignorant, misinformed, and gullible are all different things.

    Access to information helps with ignorance, and even then only if the ignorant person isn't too dumb to understand or hear had their mind poisoned with falsehood.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Pretty sure it's a complex soup of dis/misinformation, conservative (not necessarily the political type) leadership, laziness, indifference, lead poisoning, and a kaleidoscope of logical fallacies.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I think what we currently see is too much misinformation.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›