top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 249 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"ChatGPT, how do I use a Java SQL connector?"

"Duplicate question, closed"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Are we sure this deal is about answering new SO questions with LLM? It's more likely to be a deal where SO sells access to its database to OpenAI so they can use human-generated content for LLM training, and SO gets to use LLM as a more efficient search through its human-generated content.

    It's possible they could also choose to delegate the duplicate decision to the LLM but let's be honest, that decision is currently crap anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Okay, but on current hardware/OS the previous solution is no longer valid... Hello?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Have you tried using Windows 11 instead of your weird Linux distro? Windows 11 is the best Operation system in the market, by the greatest software company Microsoft. It features the best user experience, not only removing all those complicated settings from your grasp but providing you with suggestions tailored just for you!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 212 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    What annoys me about companies like StackOverflow, Reddit, Twitter, etc. partnering with AI firms is that they do not actually create any of the content on their platforms. Sure, if you read the terms they technically own the data, but still...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 101 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Just more nonsense showing how broken modern copyright is. It's too hard to write weasely legalese to just say you have the right to reproduce content submitted to your website, you have to own it entirely. And if you own it, why not sell it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago

    It's not difficult at all, these companies just have no reason to do it that way. They force you to agree to their terms before you can use the website at all, which means they're in a much better position to make demands. We can't counter with anything, it's just "agree that we own this copy of your content".

    And most of us agree to it because we have no way of knowing that someday our content might actually be worth something.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's basically what most tech companies are trying to optimize these days, the ability to make money off of other people's work. It's why they're so hyped about trying to use AI to replace the very workers it's trained on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Most of modern civilization wasn't built by the current S&P500 — most of them didn't exist 50 years ago, let alone 100 — it was built by humanity, collectively, over thousands of years.

    That fact won't stop any individual or corporation from trying to claim absolute dominion over the entire human population, all derivative works and resources, or the rest of our descendants futures, for all eternity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 106 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Can't wait to get insulted by the AI for asking a "stupid" question and be told the answer has already been asked without a link but with a passive aggressive tone hinting my family tree might have been close knit akin to a thumbleweed.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Or being to to google the problem with the only result being the question you just asked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Yeah but a lot of people don't really know what SO is for. They think you just go there and get help and call it a day. But the entire point is to produce structured questions, discourse, and answers aimed at future readers. Super specific, no-context, or duplicate problems are not useful. If you are not trying to generate useful content, don't go to SO.

    Just look at all the people getting frustrated at being told "you should probably do it a different way." They really don't understand that just because they're asking the question, it's not all about them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 85 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Now they partner with OpenAI after banning AI answers provided by users? Wow, such hypocrisy https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/policy-generative-ai-e-g-chatgpt-is-banned

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Were they trying to avoid having AI produced output sold as LLM input along with their human user generated content? I wonder if this was some big picture decision or pure coincidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 76 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Chatgpt: How do I kill all the children in this thread?

    As a AI model I'm not allowed to promote violence against... Also since children are involved this case was reported to your local enforcement agency

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 51 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Jesus fuck, don’t take Stack away. I rely on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago

    A match made in hell

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago

    Are you serious? Such a great loss.

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    On the plus side, it can't get any worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 45 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    lol this is going to be fantastically catastrophic. ChatGPT is going to end up indirectly writing so much code. And I am fully aware how often ChatGPT give you absolute nonsense when asked to write some code. It’s got a decently high hit rate for relatively unchallenging stuff, but it is nowhere NEAR 100% accurate.

    TL;DR stackoverflow doesn’t understand how many developers naively copypaste shit from stackoverflow I guess? Wcgw

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 44 points 2 years ago

    AI will be the downfall of AI

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm more worried about Stack ruining gpt than gpt ruining stack.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Stack trying to remain relevant

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    8% of 25 is the same as 25% of 8 and one of them is much easier to do in your head.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Why is the OpenAI logo an anus?

    OH. Oh right. Sorry. Withdrawn.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Makes sense, don't MS own SO, GH, OAI, and Minecraft?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Cool, I guess I'll go delete all my stuff...

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    glad i deleted my acct years ago

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you can't beat 'em, join 'em?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›