369
Stack Overflow and OpenAI Partner (files.mastodon.online)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 249 points 1 year ago

"ChatGPT, how do I use a Java SQL connector?"

"Duplicate question, closed"

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

Are we sure this deal is about answering new SO questions with LLM? It's more likely to be a deal where SO sells access to its database to OpenAI so they can use human-generated content for LLM training, and SO gets to use LLM as a more efficient search through its human-generated content.

It's possible they could also choose to delegate the duplicate decision to the LLM but let's be honest, that decision is currently crap anyway.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I think the joke is that the AI trained on SO data to the point that duplicate, similar, or common questions would get this treatment. Since that's common enough on SO to be a meme.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Okay, but on current hardware/OS the previous solution is no longer valid... Hello?!

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Have you tried using Windows 11 instead of your weird Linux distro? Windows 11 is the best Operation system in the market, by the greatest software company Microsoft. It features the best user experience, not only removing all those complicated settings from your grasp but providing you with suggestions tailored just for you!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 212 points 1 year ago

What annoys me about companies like StackOverflow, Reddit, Twitter, etc. partnering with AI firms is that they do not actually create any of the content on their platforms. Sure, if you read the terms they technically own the data, but still...

[-] [email protected] 101 points 1 year ago

Just more nonsense showing how broken modern copyright is. It's too hard to write weasely legalese to just say you have the right to reproduce content submitted to your website, you have to own it entirely. And if you own it, why not sell it?

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

It's not difficult at all, these companies just have no reason to do it that way. They force you to agree to their terms before you can use the website at all, which means they're in a much better position to make demands. We can't counter with anything, it's just "agree that we own this copy of your content".

And most of us agree to it because we have no way of knowing that someday our content might actually be worth something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

That's basically what most tech companies are trying to optimize these days, the ability to make money off of other people's work. It's why they're so hyped about trying to use AI to replace the very workers it's trained on.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most of modern civilization wasn't built by the current S&P500 — most of them didn't exist 50 years ago, let alone 100 — it was built by humanity, collectively, over thousands of years.

That fact won't stop any individual or corporation from trying to claim absolute dominion over the entire human population, all derivative works and resources, or the rest of our descendants futures, for all eternity.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

The goal of every thief is to take something of value from someone else without any repercussions for themselves.

[-] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can't wait to get insulted by the AI for asking a "stupid" question and be told the answer has already been asked without a link but with a passive aggressive tone hinting my family tree might have been close knit akin to a thumbleweed.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

Or being to to google the problem with the only result being the question you just asked.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

We will fondly look back on the days of finding highly specific dead forum threads that are a decade or more old about the issue we were having.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

DUPLICATE COMMENT

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah but a lot of people don't really know what SO is for. They think you just go there and get help and call it a day. But the entire point is to produce structured questions, discourse, and answers aimed at future readers. Super specific, no-context, or duplicate problems are not useful. If you are not trying to generate useful content, don't go to SO.

Just look at all the people getting frustrated at being told "you should probably do it a different way." They really don't understand that just because they're asking the question, it's not all about them.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying it's not the friendliest way to enthuse beginners to this way of working.

I get it's frustrating, but when you're asking your first question ever, it feels like paying for everyone else. xD

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago

Now they partner with OpenAI after banning AI answers provided by users? Wow, such hypocrisy https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/policy-generative-ai-e-g-chatgpt-is-banned

[-] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago

Now they're getting paid, so fuck you!

[-] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

That exactly tracks. You can't feed answers from an AI into an AI. It gets all incesty (technical term). So they have to ban user submitted AI answers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Were they trying to avoid having AI produced output sold as LLM input along with their human user generated content? I wonder if this was some big picture decision or pure coincidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago

Chatgpt: How do I kill all the children in this thread?

As a AI model I'm not allowed to promote violence against... Also since children are involved this case was reported to your local enforcement agency

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

Jesus fuck, don’t take Stack away. I rely on it.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

A match made in hell

[-] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago

Are you serious? Such a great loss.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

On the plus side, it can't get any worse.

[-] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As an AI language model I'm not able to answer duplicate questions and this was asked before. Closing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago

lol this is going to be fantastically catastrophic. ChatGPT is going to end up indirectly writing so much code. And I am fully aware how often ChatGPT give you absolute nonsense when asked to write some code. It’s got a decently high hit rate for relatively unchallenging stuff, but it is nowhere NEAR 100% accurate.

TL;DR stackoverflow doesn’t understand how many developers naively copypaste shit from stackoverflow I guess? Wcgw

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

AI will be the downfall of AI

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

I'm more worried about Stack ruining gpt than gpt ruining stack.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

Me: How would I write a for-loop that starts from the end of a list?

ChatGPT: Closing this conversation as this question has already been answered.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The working solution being 5 child comments deep on a wrong solution flagged as correct is my favorite.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Stack trying to remain relevant

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Oops! All Wrong Answers!

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

The snake eating its own tail

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Why is the OpenAI logo an anus?

OH. Oh right. Sorry. Withdrawn.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, don't MS own SO, GH, OAI, and Minecraft?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Don't forget NPM.

And, while we're at it:

  • Bethesda
  • Activision
  • Blizzard
  • Obsidian
  • Mojang
  • Rare
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Cool, I guess I'll go delete all my stuff...

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

glad i deleted my acct years ago

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

the reason I go to stack overflow is the answers arent hallucinated by an AI

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
369 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

70995 readers
3335 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS