all 45 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 88 points 2 years ago (17 children)

I have this vpn because it comes for free with my Google Drive subscription. I have never used it because it does not do what I expect it to do

  • privacy, it's Google.
  • pretend to be in a different country is not available
  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    what's the utility of the vpn then???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Security when you’re on untrusted network. I can trust Google to snoop my banking data and update the spending power info on my ad profile, I can’t trust the random dude in trench coat also using the public wifi when I am traveling out of my roaming coverage.

    I joke of course, but the security aspect is still valid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    What is it that you're doing that is still not using some form of authenticated encryption? Almost everything is https, ssh, almost all mailservers have tls support, irc does have tls support.. What's left that needs to be encrypted by a VPN?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The addresses themselves that you're connecting to as one example. Also often DNS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Strictly speaking, Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) paired with DNS Over HTTPS (DOH) can resolve this. But not many people have their systems setup this way, so it is still pretty niche.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What's the threat model here? I can think of no DNS shennanigans that would not be detectable through the authentication mechainsms in TLS (chain-of-trust). Not having to trust network infrastructure is exactly what TLS is for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago*

    Most DNS requests are clear text, which is why DOH was introduced to secure it such that no one can snoop on you looking up something-embarrassing.com. Also, the initial request, before you get the SSL certificate from the web server, you must tell the server at 169.169.169.169 that you’re looking for the certificate for something-embarrassing.com before they can get you the correct certificate. This is why ECH was introduced. Neither of which have became mainstream yet, and so there are still some basic leakage going on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    It's not the guy in the trenchcoat next to you you need to worry about.

    It's the fact that some unknown entity owns/has set up the WiFi.

    Anyone working with complex network setup and admin will tell you how much you can abuse owning the network a user is connected to.

    The network guys at work never use public WiFi, not hotels or anything. Neither do I, even with my much more limited knowledge of network administration.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The biggest thing was being able to switch it on and off from the notifications menu. It is/was super convenient.

    Not surprised this is being shut down because it lacked many of the features that most major vpns had.

    But that feature was unique.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Another service to add to the pile of things Google barely supported then killed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago

    Google shutting down a service?! That's a new one. I would have never expected that.

  • source
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Imagine buying a VPN off google...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I feel cucked having google only get most of my traffic. I am an alpha male, I want them to get all of my traffic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Why would I use a Google VPN anyways

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Some people think that Google is trustworthy. They still believe that the motto “Do No Evil” was ever relevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago

    TIL they had a VPN

  • source
  • [+] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago*

    > VPN

    > by Google

    > Gets shut down

    You literally can’t make this stuff up folks

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    This is why I rarely get on board with new Google products nowadays. I know they'll get half assed support and then be killed off really quickly.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Google, Meta, Microsoft.

    Three companies I would never trust as a VPN provider. Not necessarily in that order.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Good, Google has enough access to everyone's data already. Nobody needs to willingly give them even more access by routing all of their traffic through a Google server.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Google One is a huge disappointment.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Google can go to hell.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    No doubt, they used this to scrape network traffic.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Another one for the grave yard

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    ITT people claim that a Google VPN is a bad product for all use cases because Google is not a privacy-respecting company. This ignores all non-privacy use cases for using a VPN.

    And even for privacy, this would've been a product where the vendors interest in protecting your privacy and your interest in protecting your privacy aligned in the case where you were not hiding from Google. For example if you used a Chromebook laptop, used the Google Chrome browser, or used Google services like Google Search and Google YouTube, then Google would already know everything about you. You can't hide your activity from them, but they can help you hide it from others.

    Similar situations exist for other privacy disrespecting companies like Microsoft and Apple, where a user might reasonably want to hide from everyone other than their vendor of choice, whose product they consider good enough to allow them to see their computer activity as part of their payment. If you already subscribe to one privacy disrespecting vendor, it makes the most sense to go all-in.

  • source