Okay, I'm at a loss. Wtf did they meaningfully change here? It looks like the definitions were streamlined for easier comprehension...
Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
They ommited the 2nd definition.
A period of disastrous loss or reversal. A few mural funds performed well in the general bloodbath of the stock market.
Just trying to make something out of nothing.
They removed the 2nd definition. Normally, I'd ignore it, but the timing is suspicious, and I wouldn't put it past google to mess with results.
Theyre hijacking the English language, chaning the definition on us
By making it mean the same thing?
They removed the informal definition