1
30
submitted 45 minutes ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
12
submitted 51 minutes ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
32
submitted 1 hour ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4
12
submitted 1 hour ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
5
10
submitted 1 hour ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6
41
submitted 3 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hello, recent Reddit convert here and I'm loving it. You even inspired me to figure out how to fully dump Windows and install LineageOS.

One thing I can't understand is the level of acrimony toward LLMs. I see things like "stochastic parrot", "glorified autocomplete", etc. If you need an example, the comments section for the post on Apple saying LLMs don't reason is a doozy of angry people: https://infosec.pub/post/29574988

While I didn't expect a community of vibecoders, I am genuinely curious about why LLMs strike such an emotional response with this crowd. It's a tool that has gone from interesting (GPT3) to terrifying (Veo 3) in a few years and I am personally concerned about many of the safety/control issues in the future.

So I ask: what is the real reason this is such an emotional topic for you in particular? My personal guess is that the claims about replacing software engineers is the biggest issue, but help me understand.

7
13
AI and misinformation (journals.sagepub.com)
submitted 3 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This was a good article on AI systems dealing with misinformation and disinformation.

Is it possible to just pull the plug on the bad robots?

8
82
submitted 12 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Link to the article without the paywall

https://archive.ph/h63Dp

9
185
submitted 15 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10
164
submitted 15 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11
143
submitted 16 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12
30
submitted 14 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13
190
The Arc Browser Is Dead (www.howtogeek.com)
submitted 20 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14
605
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15
47
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16
445
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
17
303
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Link without the paywall

https://archive.ph/xBQ0g

18
280
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

DNS set up guidelines.

Protective resolution ad-blocking

IP address: 86.54.11.13

IPv6: 2a13:1001::86:54:11:13

DNS over HTTPS: noads.joindns4.eu/dns-query

DNS over TLS: noads.joindns4.eu

19
121
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Increasingly, surveillance is being normalized and integrated in our lives. Under the guise of convenience, applications and features are sold to us as being the new better way to do things. While some might be useful, this convenience is a Trojan horse. The cost of it is the continuous degradation of our privacy rights, with all that that entails.

As appalling as it is, the truth is the vast majority of software companies do not consider privacy rights and data minimization practices strongly enough, if at all. Most fail to implement the principles of Privacy by Design that should guide development from the start.

Whether this comes from ignorance, incompetence, greed, or malicious intent can be debated. It matters little, because the result is the same: Technologies collecting (and monetizing) a shameful amount of data from everyone.

This horrifying trend ends up facilitating and normalizing surveillance in our daily lives. It is the opposite direction of where we should be going.

The more we accept this normalized surveillance, the harder it becomes to fight back. It is critical that we firmly and loudly object to this banalized invasion of our privacy.

There are countless examples of this growing issue, but for now let's focus on three of them: Airport face scans, parking apps, and AI assistants.

20
144
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
21
123
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22
525
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23
362
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
24
74
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Replace people with AI then hire people to replace the AI….

25
471
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

Technology

70995 readers
3037 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS