1
14
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Follow up to the discussion in this thread: https://literature.cafe/post/20498464

Given the variety of perspectives shared in that thread, I don't think that a single community will be able to satisfy everyone.

As such, I have come up with the following split:

While it does fragment the userbase (always a risk with in the fediverse), it would put give individual users the maximum amount of choice for what posts they wish to see in their feed, and what topics they wish to discuss.

I am interested in hearing people's thoughts.

2
4
submitted 21 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
1
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4
31
Priorities (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
5
17
New spin-off just dropped (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6
4
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

(Apologies if this was the wrong place to post this)


Between:

[email protected] – focused on J.K. Rowling herself (but not HP fandom talk),

[email protected] – for discussing the HP universe, while condemning transphobia but steering clear of Rowling-related non-HP topics,

and this community ([email protected]) – focusing primarily on books and fan creations, with limited space for movies and open Rowling discussion,

…it’s clear a lot of care has gone into keeping each space clear and purposeful.


That said, I was wondering:

Have the mods ever considered creating a fourth Harry Potter community specifically dedicated to memes—similar to Reddit’s r/HarryPotterMemes?

This could help lighten the load on the main discussion communities, which sometimes get bogged down (at least, IMHO) with meme posts.

A dedicated memes space might allow more focused discussions here, while giving meme content its own breathing room.


Or, do the current user numbers on Lemmy make that kind of separation unnecessary for now?

Reddit obviously has a much larger user base, so perhaps it's not yet practical.


Thanks for all the work you put into these communities—I’d love to hear your thoughts.

7
9
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8
4
No, I am (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
35
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10
-3
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://literature.cafe/post/22178336

Let’s be real: Ravenclaw gets typecast a lot.

To most people—both in the Books, Fics, and IRL Fandom—Ravenclaws are just “the smart ones.”

The brains of the operation.

The nerds.

The bookworms.

The early-years Hermione Grangers who always know the answer, get top marks, and practically live in the library.


But, at least IMHO, that’s a huge oversimplification.

Not all Ravenclaws are book-smart or even traditionally clever.

What really defines Ravenclaw, to me, is curiosity, creativity, and independent thought.


It’s not just the house of facts—it’s the house of wonder.

It’s where people go when they think differently, and aren’t afraid to let their minds wander into the weird, the beautiful, or the unknown.

Yes, there are plenty of book-smart Ravenclaws—but being a Ravenclaw isn’t about knowing everything, it’s about wanting to know anything.

It’s about being curious, creative, and totally willing to fall down a research rabbit hole at 2AM just because your brain won’t let something go.


Take Luna Lovegood. She’s not exactly acing every exam (no offence, Luna), but she’s one of the most unique, insightful, and artistic characters in the entire series. She sees the world her own way, believes in things others don’t, and doesn’t care what anyone thinks. That’s Ravenclaw energy in its purest form.


Or Cho Chang—more emotionally driven, athletic, and confident. She’s a Seeker, not a scholar. But that doesn’t mean she doesn’t belong. She’s thoughtful, compassionate, and introspective. That’s intelligence too.


Marietta Edgecombe made a morally complicated choice—one that might make people dislike her, but again, it was her decision.


And Padma Patil and Terry Boot? Quietly competent, observant, and not afraid to stand up and question things (see: their role in Dumbledore’s Army).


Here’s the thing: Ravenclaw isn’t just about being smart, it’s about thinking differently.

It’s the house of inventors, artists, theorists, and philosophers.

It’s where questions are asked not for grades or clout, but because we genuinely want to know.

In a lot of ways, Ravenclaw is like the anti-Slytherin.

Two sides of the same coin.


Where Slytherins are cunning and ambitious (usually in pursuit of something—glory, influence, legacy), Ravenclaws will dive into a 3-day magical research binge because a painting blinked weirdly at them and now they need to know the history of magical portrait enchantments since the 12th century.


If a Slytherin gets asked, “Why is the sky blue?”, they’ll learn the answer to impress someone or gain leverage.

Ask a Ravenclaw, and they’ll go full conspiracy board on it at 3AM, muttering about light refraction and magical atmosphere density just because their brain demanded answers.


In a way, Ravenclaw is almost the anti-Slytherin. Not because they oppose each other—but because Ravenclaws often seek knowledge with no endgame in mind. Just for the joy of the journey.

So yeah, sure, we’ve got the bookworms and the high-achievers.

But Ravenclaw is also the home of artists, oddballs, dreamers, inventors, philosophers, codebreakers, and magical conspiracy theorists.

It’s not just about what you know—it’s about what you’re willing to explore.


Anyone else feel like Ravenclaw deserves a little more love for the creative side of the house?

11
-3
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Okay, hear me out before you roll your eyes.


A lot of people—both in-universe characters and fans IRL love to dunk on Hufflepuff.

“The House of Duffers,”

“The Leftovers,”

“The ones who weren’t brave, smart, or ambitious enough.”

etc.


Even Snape makes digs at them, and let’s be honest, fandom memes haven’t helped either.

But the more I think about it, the more I’ve come to believe that Hufflepuff might actually be the most terrifying house of them all.


Think about it:

Hufflepuffs are known for being loyal, hard-working, and unafraid of toil.

That’s the kind of person who will dedicate their entire existence to avenging a loved one.


You kill their cat?

They’ll study dark magic in secret for years if they have to.

They won’t just hex you and move on—they’ll destroy your entire legacy.

Slowly.

Thoroughly.

Lovingly.


Imagine a Hufflepuff going full Sebastian Sallow, mastering dark magic not for power or ego, but because someone crossed the line.

Perhaps a Family Member is Sick, or Cursed (a la Sebastian Sallow).

Perhaps they hurt someone that they loved, i.e a family member, a spouse, a child, etc.

Or Worse.


And unlike Sebastian, they wouldn't spiral —they'd stay focused.

Disciplined.

Unrelenting.


Or a Hufflepuff who goes full John Wick because someone messed with their Kneazle.

They're not flashy about it. No big speeches. Just quiet, efficient vengeance.


And it doesn’t have to be dark.

These are the same people who will build an empire: legal, underground, or somewhere in between, whether it's a chain of apothecaries, a magical transport syndicate, or an underground dueling circuit, - through sheer persistence.

You laugh at them now, and 10 years later they own the Leaky Cauldron, 47% of Diagon Alley, control every Floo connection west of Surrey, and your wand mortgage.


We always talk about Gryffindors being Brave, Ravenclaws being Smart, Slytherins being Cunning...

but Hufflepuffs?

They endure.

They grind.

They don’t give up (they most likely don't even know the MEANING).

And that, my friends, is terrifying.


I say this as someone who’s not even a Puff—I’m a proud Slyther-Claw hybrid—but I’d never underestimate a Hufflepuff.

Not for a second.


Anyone else ever thought about this?

Or have headcanons of Hufflepuff characters that could go toe-to-toe with the best (or worst) of any other house?

12
5
Who could get this wrong? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13
22
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14
33
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15
1
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16
41
Harry vs Ron (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
17
45
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
18
42
Education is key (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19
72
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20
4
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The distribution of magic schools across the world, according to JK Rowling.

21
22
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22
17
Who would have guessed (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23
16
submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
24
55
submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
25
13
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Happy Pride everyone!

view more: next ›

Harry Potter

712 readers
10 users here now

Community dedicated to the world of Harry Potter.

Mostly focused on books and fan creations, movie content is accepted but should not overwhelm the community.

Discussions about JKR are allowed.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS