9
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

(Mirror. Mirror. Mirror.)

A computer‐assisted content analysis (Bolasco 2000) of seven textbooks currently used for history teaching in Italian high schools was carried out to examine to what extent past atrocities perpetrated during Italy’s African colonial wars are acknowledged and taught. More specifically, we investigated the relative importance these texts devote to teaching established historical facts or to achieve socio‐psychological aims, such as advancing reconciliation processes and protecting the in‐group’s social identity.

Social psychologists working in the field of intergroup reconciliation usually consider these two aims as partially competing. The models reviewed by Nadler et al. (2008a) all consider the need to protect personal social identity as a source of biases, which the search for historical truth has to accommodate.

In contrast, a recent work by Pratto and Glasford (2008) stresses that social identity can play a positive rôle as a powerful motivation for reconciliation. They suggest that acknowledging historical faults may assist the difficult process of finding a balance between the need for self‐esteem and self‐integrity and the need to belong.

Our results seem to confirm certain aspects of the first group of models, and other aspects of Pratto and Glasford’s review. The crucial point seems to be the use of abstract or concrete terms to describe in‐group wrongdoings. Strikingly, more than seventy years after the Italian colonial wars only three textbooks out of seven fully describe atrocities perpetrated by the in‐group using clear, concrete terminology; this is consistent with the idea of a tension between reconciliation and justice.

On the other hand, the more concrete descriptions, although less frequent, seem better able to protect the in‐group’s self‐integrity by showing their young readers a clearer acceptance of moral responsibility for the historical faults of their group.

(Emphasis added.)

Admittedly, this might be outdated since they published this in 2010. On the other hand, with the popularity of neofascism in Italy it would be surprising if the establishment has made substantial progress since then.

See also: The Image of Italian Colonialism in Italian History Textbooks for Secondary Schools


Click here for events that happened today (January 28).1932: Imperial forces assaulted Shanghai.
1941: After the final air battle of the Franco‐Thai War ended, a Japanese‐mediated armistice went into effect later in the day.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Capitalism in Decay

1508 readers
20 users here now

Fascism is capitalism in decay. As with anticommunism in general, the ruling class has oversimplified this phenomenon to the point of absurdity and teaches but a small fraction of its history. This is the spot for getting a serious understanding of it (from a more proletarian perspective) and collecting the facts that contemporary anticommunists are unlikely to discuss.

Posts should be relevant to either fascism or neofascism, otherwise they belong in [email protected]. If you are unsure if the subject matter is related to either, share it there instead. Off‐topic posts shall be removed.

No capitalist apologia or other anticommunism. No bigotry, including racism, misogyny, ableism, heterosexism, or xenophobia. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome.

For our purposes, we consider early Shōwa Japan to be capitalism in decay.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS