1
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Unsurprising. And I suspect the results wouldn't be very different elsewhere.

And that's why we're fucked.

2
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
2
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

She's on a roll....

4
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
5
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I'm not big on Apple. I don't own a single Apple device. And I'm acutely aware there's a lot of problems with talking up the climate effort of companies whose profits are intimately linked to pushing consumerism, but it's good they're at least making an effort to be less shit than many others can be bothered to...

8
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/3402975

The increasing popularity of ultra-heavy SUVs in England means a conventional-engined car bought in 2013 will, on average, have lower carbon emissions than one bought new today, new research has found.

The study by the climate campaign group Possible said there was a strong correlation between income and owning a large SUV, which meant there was a sound argument for “polluter pays” taxes for vehicle emissions based on size.

Huge, bulky cares emit more?!? Who would've thought?

9
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://derp.foo/post/320312

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

11
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Same news as The Guardian article a couple of days ago, but a bit more details.

14
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's hard to get the scale of these wind farms until you see how tiny that ship is next to the thing... Yikes.

16
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/3083945

Court's ruling on environmental impact law clips federal government's wings on climate change, expert says

17
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
18
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Sunak once again making things worse.

20
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
21
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
24
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
25
1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

Climate@stad

0 readers
1 users here now

Climate News / Opinion

Both news and articles of interest. "Solarpunk" as well as dystopian articles welcome, but they should be rooted in talking about projections, technology, society or ideas relating to climate change and our future not be pure fiction.

founded 2 years ago