you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Couple reasons.

One: do you know anything about that model of firearm? Does it have a safety? Can it slam-fire if handled improperly?

Two: Is there important information that can be conveyed by the present condition of the firearm. Was it a shooting or an accident. Would clearing the firearm remove important information that can be used to ascertain what happened?

Three: Preserving the firearm can preserve evidence. While that is not necessarily part of the duty of medical staff, there's no reason to risk destroying evidence if the firearm can be safely isolated with minimal disturbance.

Four: Why do it? An isolated, secure gun isn't going to decide to start blasting people on its own. What advantage is there to handling the gun more than is necessary in that situation? Get it out of the way and keep working.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    You're already assumed to be handling the gun from the onset. Most handguns are pretty standard if they're from this century. The physician is likely wearing gloves and the conviction isn't as important as everybody's immediate safety. The gun isn't in an isolated secure place, this is a physician's office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (3 children)

    So if you were studying to be a physician and you were given this test question you would refuse to answer it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments