I know data privacy is important and I know that big corporations like Meta became powerful enough to even manipulate elections using our data.

But, when I talk to people in general, most seem to not worry because they "have nothing to hide", and most are only worried about their passwords, banking apps and not much else.

So, why should people worry about data privacy even if they have "nothing to hide"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago (11 children)

It doesn't have to be inevitable in order to serve as an example of what can happen when even seemingly innocuous information falls into the wrong hands. It's happened before, and the consequences were horrifying. It will happen again, particularly if people refuse to learn from the examples of history.

Information is knowledge. Knowledge is power. And power in the wrong hands is dangerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    That feels like a scapegoat argument. That reduces down to "bad things happen when bad people do bad things."

    You can argue against anything when you say that.

    "Dentists should be outlawed because some dentists have abused their clients " Isn't a fair argument either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    That is not a fair or accurate characterization of what I have been saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (7 children)

    How could you explain it better for an argument then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (6 children)

    That historic examples such as the Nazis, the Japanese-American internment, and the Rwanda genocide should guide us when deciding what sorts of large-scale demographic data harvesting we as a society want to allow in the first place. That the "right to privacy" in this case is not about personal privacy but of collective privacy.

    Which is why even people who "have nothing to hide" should care about privacy rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    That's just reiterating the same thing without expanding on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    This strongly suggests that you already understood me perfectly well, and never needed clarification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

    Nowhere did I say I misunderstood.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    If you understood then your previous characterization of what I've been saying was willfully dishonest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    You have to put the risks into context with upsides. Dentists serve a verifiable and vast positive. Can you equate that to sharing personal information?

    IMO at least not generally, as a generic statement.

  • source
  • parent