I guess they're giving up on convincing people to download their launcher.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I don't understand what the point of a blizzard launcher is - steam is already a launcher.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ads. Ads and data harvesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The games are coming to Steam. Even if the launcher is there, Steam still gets the 30%

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    IDK what your comment is about, but its not a coincidence the first blizz game coming to steam is free to play,

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    In-app purchases, mtx, DLC, and premium currency are also subject to Valve tax for games that are on Steam. Free to play means "enough people pay $200+ that we can get away with not selling it for $50", putting it on Steam still means Valve gets a piece of the pie.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    The Battle.net launcher pre-dates Steam though, doesn’t it?

    Edit: guess not. Steam came out in 2003. I hadn’t heard of it until well after the Battle.net launcher came out in 2013. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Battle.net actually launched in 1996, though the client as it existed back then would hardly be recognizable as a launcher/storefront today. The modern client launched in 2009.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments